- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is keto best?
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:00 pm to lsu777
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:00 pm to lsu777
Perhaps, but I was talking about overall benefits of bhb. I keep my muscle tone pretty constant and in shape for my activities. I have different goals.
I linked this eg above.
LINK
I linked this eg above.
LINK
quote:
Neuro-inflammation has been shown to play a critical role in the development of depression. Beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) is a ketone body and has recently been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects via inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:08 pm to McLemore
No I wasn't disagreeing with you just simply saying it's not optimal for muscle gains nor performance in strength sports.
I have said many times I believe keto/ Paleo are the best diet for overall health. And they are good for cutting.
But they do not cause fat loss at any greater rate than any other diet. Alot of the keto guys like to scream about MA Insulin this and MY insulin this and like to post up all these so called facts about fat loss yet there is not a single study done outside of the fat fast expiermented in the 60s that shows greater fat loss when. Comparing keto to iso caloric when calories are equal and protein is accounted for. Tmit just doesn't work in real life like everyone thinks. Dozens of studies show the opposite and that the only things that really matter for 90% or so to reach their goals are caloric level and protein level combined with consistency.
Sure nutrient timing helps as do other strategies like IF but they matter very little overall.
I have said many times I believe keto/ Paleo are the best diet for overall health. And they are good for cutting.
But they do not cause fat loss at any greater rate than any other diet. Alot of the keto guys like to scream about MA Insulin this and MY insulin this and like to post up all these so called facts about fat loss yet there is not a single study done outside of the fat fast expiermented in the 60s that shows greater fat loss when. Comparing keto to iso caloric when calories are equal and protein is accounted for. Tmit just doesn't work in real life like everyone thinks. Dozens of studies show the opposite and that the only things that really matter for 90% or so to reach their goals are caloric level and protein level combined with consistency.
Sure nutrient timing helps as do other strategies like IF but they matter very little overall.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:08 pm to McLemore
I like keto for losing weight. It keeps me from getting bloated and the energy levels are definitely consistent. Right now I'm on a "performance" diet kind of like the vertical diet but it's just a lot of steak, chicken, white rice, and soy sauce. I have a lot of water and bloat and it sucks but I can go longer and harder in the gym.
I'm around 230-235
#noskinnychamps
I'm around 230-235
#noskinnychamps
This post was edited on 6/5/18 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 6/6/18 at 6:45 am to lsu777
Yeah it's really hard to weed out the rahrah types from the science.
I start w real doctors like
Peter Attia, Phinney/Volek and their team, etc, and then just sort of enjoy the enthusiasm of the rest with a grain (or 12g per day) of salt.
ETA: when I am training for more serious stuff, I'm finding I can eat a lot more protein and carbs (like 5x+ the "normal" keto limit) and still remain in nutritional ketosis or at least cycle back in quickly and continue running mostly on ketones.
I'm definitely not dogmatic about it, but my thought is, it's a very natural (as in effortless and historically sound) way of eating and is only weird because of the events of the fairly recent past.
But as far as anything magical, I always go back to the 3 step-function changes mankind has experienced, in longevity and health: sanitation, childbirth and germs. Eating well can help, but it isn't a true step change. I do think, however, that eating poorly can pretty well erode the benefits of the previous three in a lot of people.
T2D, CVD and obesity are the standard-bearers of that theory.
I start w real doctors like
Peter Attia, Phinney/Volek and their team, etc, and then just sort of enjoy the enthusiasm of the rest with a grain (or 12g per day) of salt.
ETA: when I am training for more serious stuff, I'm finding I can eat a lot more protein and carbs (like 5x+ the "normal" keto limit) and still remain in nutritional ketosis or at least cycle back in quickly and continue running mostly on ketones.
I'm definitely not dogmatic about it, but my thought is, it's a very natural (as in effortless and historically sound) way of eating and is only weird because of the events of the fairly recent past.
But as far as anything magical, I always go back to the 3 step-function changes mankind has experienced, in longevity and health: sanitation, childbirth and germs. Eating well can help, but it isn't a true step change. I do think, however, that eating poorly can pretty well erode the benefits of the previous three in a lot of people.
T2D, CVD and obesity are the standard-bearers of that theory.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 6:53 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 7:27 am to lsu777
quote:
post up all these so called facts about fat loss yet there is not a single study done outside of the fat fast expiermented in the 60s that shows greater fat loss when. Comparing keto to iso caloric when calories are equal and protein is accounted for.
So many qualifiers to make a valid, and true, statement. People have so much success because keto is effortless weight loss. People need to start seeing what the body requires to maintain health and what is real food.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 8:32 am to Junky
I qualify those statements because the fat fast expierment doesn't have a tone of data on it, was sub 1000 calories, and was done 40 years ago.
As far as the rest you highlighted, that's what a study test. It test when caloric levels are the same and protein is high enough to maintain muscle. That's not qualifiers that's basic science and common sense.
And I have said many times keto is a great diet for those looking for weight loss or maintaining current body composition. And yes people have effortless weight loss for a long time on keto and let's talk about why.
They have weight loss because keto forces you to eat whole foods that are very full filling. So people eat less overall calories. It is not, at least according to any evidence or any scientific study, due to "MAA Insulin". Over a dozens studies prove this. There is not one single study done in the last 25 years that shows otherwise.
Same thing with IF, just had a study come out on 5:2 fasting that showed of weekly calories are equal, weight loss is the same regardless of how or when it is taken in. Now that study did show that like with keto, specific diets tend to cause fat loss from different areas that differ from a basic isocaloric diet.
With all that being said, I do believe a basic fat loss regiment that consist of an hour of walking a day and lifting weights in a progressive manner with the basic compound lifts combined with a diet of 3 or 4 meals consisting of
2 palms full of the meat of their choice or 4 whole eggs
Two palms full of veggies
Eat this three times a day with a 40g protein shake and most people will do very well for a long time. After 3 or 4 weeks one can add one palm full of a whole food carb source at lunch on lifting days.
I do believe when it comes to fat loss science is somewhat behind but I believe it's behind in the fact that we can't figure out why keto, IF and carb cycling tend to cause fat loss from areas that are low in beta receptors much faster than an iso caloric diet. We are easily able to detect how much and from where the fat loss is occurring, it's the matter of why that the scientific community can not answer yet.
I have no problem with you junky or many others but I do have an issue with people like scrub who make statements like keto is the best diet for performance and best diet for gaining muscle. When he doesn't even lift heavy weights and has no clue what is the best. Annoys the piss out of me because it is complete bullshite. Carbs are needed to gain muscle optimally. All you have to do is look up the science surrounding activation of mtor. All you have to do is look and see what science says about which macro is easiest to store as body fat and which is hardest to store when in a caloric surplus.
This isn't complicated, people just try to make it. Just like the statement that fruit is bad for you and is making you fat that I have seen some others make.
I am all for people doing the diet that makes you happy. I prefer a lower carb approach my self cause I love meat and carbs tend to make my stomach hurt, but the attitude some have that keto is the best for everything despite all the scientific evidence showing it's not true, is astounding and frankly it's annoying as shite. Keto more than has it's place and it is a great tool, but it is just that, a tool not the end all be all best everything because of "MA insulin"
As far as the rest you highlighted, that's what a study test. It test when caloric levels are the same and protein is high enough to maintain muscle. That's not qualifiers that's basic science and common sense.
And I have said many times keto is a great diet for those looking for weight loss or maintaining current body composition. And yes people have effortless weight loss for a long time on keto and let's talk about why.
They have weight loss because keto forces you to eat whole foods that are very full filling. So people eat less overall calories. It is not, at least according to any evidence or any scientific study, due to "MAA Insulin". Over a dozens studies prove this. There is not one single study done in the last 25 years that shows otherwise.
Same thing with IF, just had a study come out on 5:2 fasting that showed of weekly calories are equal, weight loss is the same regardless of how or when it is taken in. Now that study did show that like with keto, specific diets tend to cause fat loss from different areas that differ from a basic isocaloric diet.
With all that being said, I do believe a basic fat loss regiment that consist of an hour of walking a day and lifting weights in a progressive manner with the basic compound lifts combined with a diet of 3 or 4 meals consisting of
2 palms full of the meat of their choice or 4 whole eggs
Two palms full of veggies
Eat this three times a day with a 40g protein shake and most people will do very well for a long time. After 3 or 4 weeks one can add one palm full of a whole food carb source at lunch on lifting days.
I do believe when it comes to fat loss science is somewhat behind but I believe it's behind in the fact that we can't figure out why keto, IF and carb cycling tend to cause fat loss from areas that are low in beta receptors much faster than an iso caloric diet. We are easily able to detect how much and from where the fat loss is occurring, it's the matter of why that the scientific community can not answer yet.
I have no problem with you junky or many others but I do have an issue with people like scrub who make statements like keto is the best diet for performance and best diet for gaining muscle. When he doesn't even lift heavy weights and has no clue what is the best. Annoys the piss out of me because it is complete bullshite. Carbs are needed to gain muscle optimally. All you have to do is look up the science surrounding activation of mtor. All you have to do is look and see what science says about which macro is easiest to store as body fat and which is hardest to store when in a caloric surplus.
This isn't complicated, people just try to make it. Just like the statement that fruit is bad for you and is making you fat that I have seen some others make.
I am all for people doing the diet that makes you happy. I prefer a lower carb approach my self cause I love meat and carbs tend to make my stomach hurt, but the attitude some have that keto is the best for everything despite all the scientific evidence showing it's not true, is astounding and frankly it's annoying as shite. Keto more than has it's place and it is a great tool, but it is just that, a tool not the end all be all best everything because of "MA insulin"
Posted on 6/6/18 at 8:42 am to Junky
quote:
People have so much success because keto is effortless weight loss
For some its effortless and for others it may take a ton of effort. I don't know why you can't understand that. I just like leaner meats in general than fatty meats and I'm not huge on cheeses or cream. For me to eat Keto I would have to sacrifice things I like and eat more of things that I really don't. It's really not that complicated.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 8:43 am to lsu777
Question for you 777, since you seem to keep up with the science more than I do.
Are there good isocaloric studies around that display consistent weight loss when there's insulin resistance and/or other metabolic disorders, such as under/overactive thyroid?
I ask this because I am seeing success with weight loss again since I went see this dietitian who lowered my carbs, limited my carb sources, and trying to better regulate insulin spiking throughout the day. I am eating 2400 cals/day on a 25%c/25%p/50%f diet and seeing around 1lb/week of weight loss and losing around 1/2 - 1 inch of size loss in various parts of my body every 2 weeks. she's also got me taking a super probiotic with 450b bacteria of various cultures and I've been focusing on getting more natural probiotics in my diet, primarily kimchi, sourkraut, and kombucha.. The success I'm seeing is making me rethink my stance a bit on diet, in particular when considering those with metabolic disorders.
Or is it simply a case of simplifying my diet means I'm just tracking much more accurately?
Are there good isocaloric studies around that display consistent weight loss when there's insulin resistance and/or other metabolic disorders, such as under/overactive thyroid?
I ask this because I am seeing success with weight loss again since I went see this dietitian who lowered my carbs, limited my carb sources, and trying to better regulate insulin spiking throughout the day. I am eating 2400 cals/day on a 25%c/25%p/50%f diet and seeing around 1lb/week of weight loss and losing around 1/2 - 1 inch of size loss in various parts of my body every 2 weeks. she's also got me taking a super probiotic with 450b bacteria of various cultures and I've been focusing on getting more natural probiotics in my diet, primarily kimchi, sourkraut, and kombucha.. The success I'm seeing is making me rethink my stance a bit on diet, in particular when considering those with metabolic disorders.
Or is it simply a case of simplifying my diet means I'm just tracking much more accurately?
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 8:44 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 9:23 am to lsu777
quote:
keto is the best diet for performance and best diet for gaining muscle.
That’s a fricking joke.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:04 am to Hulkklogan
i can't say for sure. but obviously you are tracking and being much more strict. and i have said before if you have a metabolic disorder you may need to go on a certain type of diet. But metabolic disorders are not as common as you might think.
as far as studies I am not aware of any. i can look though.
I personally think food quality can make a difference and have said so myself, but it makes the difference imo in how you feel, amount of inflamation in your body etc. if you feel better you are more likely to increase non exercise physical activity etc. could be a number of combinations.
now in your case I can say this, you tended to cheat a lot. pretty much every weekend you were talking about how you fell off the wagon, or how you had an activity coming up and you were not going to stay strict etc. Stopping this and being held accountable is prolly a big key to your success. also I have scene you in the past have success for a long time when you were tracking consistently. SO you having success at the beginning is nothing new to you.
please do not take this as an insult because it was not. I am simply stating what I have scene. honestly the biggest thing with anyone is consistency.
as far as studies I am not aware of any. i can look though.
I personally think food quality can make a difference and have said so myself, but it makes the difference imo in how you feel, amount of inflamation in your body etc. if you feel better you are more likely to increase non exercise physical activity etc. could be a number of combinations.
now in your case I can say this, you tended to cheat a lot. pretty much every weekend you were talking about how you fell off the wagon, or how you had an activity coming up and you were not going to stay strict etc. Stopping this and being held accountable is prolly a big key to your success. also I have scene you in the past have success for a long time when you were tracking consistently. SO you having success at the beginning is nothing new to you.
please do not take this as an insult because it was not. I am simply stating what I have scene. honestly the biggest thing with anyone is consistency.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:27 am to Hulkklogan
quote:
Hulkklogan
I may be interested in this person for someone, can you share information on her?
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:34 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
For sure something you should look into for that person as there is no way she should have to go as low as she does. also might want to contact the people that run avatar nutrition and let them know what the case is and get their opinion and run their app.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:49 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
For some its effortless and for others it may take a ton of effort. I don't know why you can't understand that. I just like leaner meats in general than fatty meats and I'm not huge on cheeses or cream. For me to eat Keto I would have to sacrifice things I like and eat more of things that I really don't. It's really not that complicated.
Yeah I can't imagine a diet centered around things that you hate being very sustainable
I might be able to lose faster on keto but I'm not willing to commit to it because it's too restrictive
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:00 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:And I've never referred to it as such.
However, I also realize Keto isn't a magic diet.
quote:
It's not an optimal diet as a particular lifting routine isn't optimal for every person
I don't understand this statement, but I'm open to you expounding further.
quote:
You seem to be pretty knowledgeable, but your Keto or bust attitude and complete disregard for logical and legitimate questions and/or skepticism completely disqualifies you from rational discussion.
You are the one who said you knew it without even trying it. I believe that disqualifies YOU.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:15 pm to lsu777
quote:
now in your case I can say this, you tended to cheat a lot. pretty much every weekend you were talking about how you fell off the wagon, or how you had an activity coming up and you were not going to stay strict etc. Stopping this and being held accountable is prolly a big key to your success. also I have scene you in the past have success for a long time when you were tracking consistently. SO you having success at the beginning is nothing new to you.
please do not take this as an insult because it was not. I am simply stating what I have scene. honestly the biggest thing with anyone is consistency.
No offense taken. I actually agree with you. Even though I would track the 'cheats' and eating out, it's tough to be accurate and consistent when eating out.
A great help to me has been to weigh less often.. Just let the process work and check in every couple of weeks. I haven't gotten so frustrated.. I just eat what I'm supposed to and let it happen. I also feel better.. less bloat, more mental clarity.. And a better mental attitude.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:17 pm to Powerman
quote:
it's too restrictive
it really isn't for me. it's actually very liberating because i know the things I will even consider buying at the store.
i still eat all the veggies i want (I don't eat potatoes), a good bit of berries, and some fruit. I don't like grains anyway, and we make so many good low-carb baked goods that i don't miss the standard versions.
same with sweets. i am not a big sweet tooth ,but i eat Halo (and Aldi knockoff), lots of dark chocolate etc.
I find it to be the least restrictive of all the non-SADs I've tried. It's just awesome to never be hungry and to keep my weight and waist rock steady.
And as i mentioned, if you add in aerobic exercise and IF, most people can up their carbs significantly, to make it even less restrictive.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:22 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
I may be interested in this person for someone, can you share information on her?
Just look up the Metabolic Spectrum Center. It's inside BR General Health & Wellness Center.. They have several dietitians there. I see Rachel Punch. She also happens to specialize in sports nutrition, which is cool for the long-term.. she can help me with my weight loss goals, then when I get there help me with muscle gain and performance in my workouts.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:23 pm to McLemore
quote:
really isn't for me
Congrats, there's about 4 billion people that aren't you.
quote:
it's actually very liberating because i know the things I will even consider buying at the store.
Again, this is your case. Some people feel Keto is restrictive FOR Them. I don't really understand how you can't understand that. We know where you stand and you have tunnel vision regarding what's "good" and what's "bad," but for the third time, your personal preferences aren't the same as everyone else's.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:24 pm to Powerman
quote:
I might be able to lose faster on keto but I'm not willing to commit to it because it's too restrictive
This statement right here never sits well with me. Too restrictive. No it isn't, most people are addicted nutrient poor foods.
You could literally stuff yourself as much as you could of the foods below and be perfectly fine but damnit if I can't have my sugar crutch.
Dang, now my mouth is watering. Probably from some primal instinct to consume meat...
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:30 pm to lsu777
quote:
I have no problem with you junky or many others but I do have an issue with people like scrub who make statements like keto is the best diet for performance and best diet for gaining muscle. When he doesn't even lift heavy weights and has no clue what is the best. Annoys the piss out of me because it is complete bullshite. Carbs are needed to gain muscle optimally. All you have to do is look up the science surrounding activation of mtor. All you have to do is look and see what science says about which macro is easiest to store as body fat and which is hardest to store when in a caloric surplus.
This is not what I'm arguing, and if that's been the impression, then I apologize and would like to clarify my actual position:
I believe that "keto" (I don't even really like calling it that) is the healthiest way to eat. I define "healthy" as "promoting disease-free longevity". I imagine there's very few people who don't want to maximize that outcome. I view weight-loss as merely a friendly by-product of eating "keto". As it pertains to weight-lifting, my point is that any outcomes in that domain that are "sub-optimal" will still clearly be good enough (I would argue that the average person wouldn't even notice the difference; I'd compare this to civilian golfers agonizing over tiny differences in club characteristics - yes, that stuff probably matters for Rory and Tiger; no, it doesn't matter for you.)
Popular
Back to top


2






