Started By
Message

re: Epicurious will no longer feature any recipes or articles containing/about beef.

Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:30 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139207 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

What's next, Almonds?

Avacados. That would really be a test of their conviction.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
18293 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

not anti-beef but pro-planet.


Like let's not call it anti-life but pro choice. When people rely on fancy wordings to persuade you, you have to question their motives.

quote:

It’s a shift about sustainability
.

So how will people get their leather shoes or belts?
Posted by geauxfortwo
Livin the dream
Member since Jan 2018
2013 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 2:33 pm to
These people actually think cows are causing climate issues....they have no clue how many bison used to roam the plains before they were killed off.
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14525 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

These people actually think cows are causing climate issues


Which makes no sense when you consider India has the third worst air quality of any country and they don't eat a whole bunch of cow.
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
19625 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Epicurious


Judging from the Gumbo thread from them on here last week they should. Using Kielbasa in a gumbo

Clown World !
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61773 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

It’s a shift about sustainability; not anti-beef but pro-planet.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
50731 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

These people actually think cows are causing climate issues....they have no clue how many bison used to roam the plains before they were killed off.

not a good comparison
bison existed within the overall biosphere

the issue with cattle ranching is the separation of livestock from agriculture. The biomass of the topsoil layer is degraded both by agriculture without livestock and by livestock without agriculture. And it is that topsoil biomass that preserves the O2/CO2 balance upon which all aerobic life on the planet depends. It affects everything from weather to ocean currents to biological diversity

I don’t care whether you eat beef or not (I certainly do) but there is a better way and it is the way that nature intended...livestock and agriculture together
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87727 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

this stuff frustrates me



Dude it's going to creep into every area of our culture. Problematizing everything and reeducating everyone isn't going away and there are obviously no checks on it in the near term because I can't imagine this will make them money.
Posted by sleepytime
Member since Feb 2014
3930 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

And last summer, when America’s annual grilling holiday rolled around

Non-communist refer to this as Independence Day or the 4th of July.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40159 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

Which makes no sense when you consider India has the third worst air quality of any country and they don't eat a whole bunch of cow.
I mean, they're stupid, but this makes no sense as a rebuttal.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40159 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Epicurious will no longer feature any recipes or articles containing/about beef.
Yeah, frick these frickers.

quote:

So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.


Lots and lots - that sounds like a lot! Someone remind me again which scientific unit a "lot" is a sub-unit of?

I'm dedicated to completely ignoring any recommendations like this until the same people start calling for pet quotas. Dogs in particular are WAY worse for the environment than beef cattle. I'll bet every one of these soy boy communists has a fricking mutt.
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14525 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I mean, they're stupid, but this makes no sense as a rebuttal.



It makes sense when you consider that cows have little to no actual impact on climate. The war on beef is peak virtual signaling.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46661 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Problematizing everything


Toxic problematicness.

Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Non-communist refer to this as Independence Day or the 4th of July.



Holy shite, I didn't even notice this. Wow.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49696 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:34 am to
Almonds take as much water as cows for the most part.

I rarely used Epicurious so not a big deal to me. Use All Recipes with Chef John and ChefSteps.

My kid cooks almost every meal from Pinterest.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40159 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:47 am to
quote:

It makes sense when you consider that cows have little to no actual impact on climate. The war on beef is peak virtual signaling.
India has one of the highest cattle counts in the world. You saying "they eat little cow" is just not a relevant point.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:49 am to
quote:

These people actually think cows are causing climate issues....they have no clue how many bison used to roam the plains before they were killed off.


In the US, at least, we have more than double the number of heads of cattle than we did at the peak population of bison.

There's little doubt that 90-100 million head of cattle have an ecological impact in the US, especially when you add in the rest of the world. That said, I don't think shaming people for eating beef, or hiding beef recipes, is exactly going to force much of a change.

One thing we could do is limit beef exports. We'd still get to eat our beef but the number of cattle would decrease (this would obviously piss off farmers and trade partners). What about using technology to lessen the methane output of cow flatulence and manure...some slight change in feed or some sort of microbial shot we give them that reduces methane emissions?

I don't know....I'm with Salmon, the grandstanding and virtue-signaling piss me off to no end. This move by Epicurious is akin to someone bitching about something on Twitter and thinking they're making a difference.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 5:56 pm to
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
21513 posts
Posted on 4/27/21 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

I'm dedicated to completely ignoring any recommendations like this until the same people start calling for pet quotas.


Pet quotas. Now that’s a good idea.

“What you in for, big man.”

“Damn cops busted me for being 4 labradoodles over the limit. Six more months of this shite.”
Posted by Degas
2187645493 posts
Member since Jul 2010
12082 posts
Posted on 4/28/21 at 12:00 am to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram