- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:35 pm
Pay out for Miles and his staff now for O and his staff, no doubt money means nothing when you do not have to earn that money.....
22
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:39 pm to classof72
Lsu earns that money by being a top 5 most recognizable college brand in the US. Our brand is as recognizable as Bama, Texas, notre dame, Ohio state, and USC. Our name is worth that much money, they earn it from ticket sales tv rights and sponsorships. Not to mention the massive booster money backing them. It ain't your money so stop fricking working about it.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:40 pm to classof72
Orgeron didn’t get big money until we won the natty. That seems to be LSU’s m.o.
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:42 pm to classof72
So how do you get coaches to come to your university when they're all going to make the same money for winning? Money is usually how you lure a coach to your university. How about focusing on doing better with the hiring process instead.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:49 pm to classof72
You are hired and paid for your past or potential. You are retained for your achievements. That is the case in most of the business world.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:50 pm to classof72
So we can assume you don't understand how capitalism, the free market, and negotiations work, right?
NO coach, except maybe those desperate for a job, would agree to a contract where they only get paid for wins rather than a contract where they get paid regardless.
Here's how your proposal would work in real life:
Ohio St AD: "Hey coach. We'd like to offer you a 5 year $40 million contract to coach our team."
LSU AD: "Hey coach, we'd like to offer you a 5 year, $60 million contract with payment contingent upon wins. Coach? Coach are your there?"
Coach to LSU AD:
"You aren't serious, right? No thanks. I think I'll just sign with Ohio St. But if you ever decide to live in the real world one day, feel free to call"
NO coach, except maybe those desperate for a job, would agree to a contract where they only get paid for wins rather than a contract where they get paid regardless.
Here's how your proposal would work in real life:
Ohio St AD: "Hey coach. We'd like to offer you a 5 year $40 million contract to coach our team."
LSU AD: "Hey coach, we'd like to offer you a 5 year, $60 million contract with payment contingent upon wins. Coach? Coach are your there?"
Coach to LSU AD:
"You aren't serious, right? No thanks. I think I'll just sign with Ohio St. But if you ever decide to live in the real world one day, feel free to call"
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:52 pm to classof72
That's not the climate of the market though
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:53 pm to classof72
So you would void contract law and reorder capitalism . Let me ask you, did you make your bed this morning?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:54 pm to classof72
It would be nice if the Contracts were low base pay with a high incentive pay, but we would never get a decent coach.
Base-1M
8 Games- 500K bonus
10 Games- 2M bonus
12 Games -4M Bonus
CFP appearance- 2M
NCAA champs- 2M
Base-1M
8 Games- 500K bonus
10 Games- 2M bonus
12 Games -4M Bonus
CFP appearance- 2M
NCAA champs- 2M
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:57 pm to classof72
quote:
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
O literally got paid for winning the national championship.
I dont understand whats going on here.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:58 pm to classof72
quote:that would be difficult, but the OP has a point. It's nauseating when coaches utterly fail, yet receive massive buyouts.
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
Orgeron, Pelini, Willie Taggert at FSU all come to mind. Many others, I'm sure.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:06 pm to classof72
Why do you hate capitalism?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:11 pm to classof72
Almost every contract is based on what you did more than what you’re gonna do.
No one takes an insanely performance based contract
No one takes an insanely performance based contract
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:11 pm to classof72
quote:
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
That’s exactly why Coach O got that fat raise, he won a championship.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to classof72
And the sky should rain tacos and skittles.
But we don't live in that world and never have.
But we don't live in that world and never have.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:19 pm to classof72
The amount of money raised by the 19 national title will cover O’s buyout 10x over
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:13 pm to classof72
Coaches pay is determined by what it takes to get a coach of the caliber you are trying to get
The end
The end
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:22 pm to classof72
I agree
Incentivize them based on wins
9
10
11
12
Conf champ
Bowl game
Bowl champs
NC
Incentivize them based on wins
9
10
11
12
Conf champ
Bowl game
Bowl champs
NC
Posted on 10/19/21 at 4:08 pm to classof72
What area of La La land are you from?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 4:30 pm to classof72
It’s kind of like being a weatherman. Your forecast is way off but you still get to keep your job.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News