Started By
Message

Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser letter on cancellation of $3 billion Mid-Barataria Diversion

Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27143 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:46 pm
quote:

BATON ROUGE – When the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion was first proposed, it was presented as a silver bullet to save coastal Louisiana. At that time, the project was projected to cost $250 million. Today, the price tag has ballooned to more than $3 billion—and that doesn’t even begin to account for the long-term environmental and economic costs this project could impose on our communities.

We now know more than we did when this diversion was conceived. A study by the Saint Andrew Institute, commissioned by the Marine Mammal Commission, shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?

Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it. We already saw the largest Gulf of Mexico dead zone in recorded history last year—over 7,000 square miles of lifeless water. That dead zone is directly tied to river-borne nutrients. Now, we want to divert that same water into the Barataria Basin, a basin with tidal movement of less than two feet daily, compared to the Gulf’s 10 to 15 feet. The result? A chokehold on the estuary that will kill oysters, shrimp, and every creature that depends on balanced salinity levels.

What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land, and even then, the land created will lie below sea level. It won’t stop storm surge. It won’t reduce insurance rates. It won’t protect our homes.

Meanwhile, there are proven, practical solutions ready to go: building barrier islands, ridges, and berms that offer real, measurable protection today. These projects reduce storm surge, protect wildlife, and preserve our coastal culture. They offer hope—right now—for a future where families can live, work, and thrive along the Louisiana coast.

I applaud Governor Jeff Landry and CPRA Chairman Gordy Dove for reevaluating this deeply flawed project and putting Louisiana’s people before politics. It takes courage to admit when the wrong path has been taken and to chart a new course. Their decision to pause and reassess the diversion in light of the facts—not just the fanfare—is a turning point.

For too long, outside organizations and special interests have shaped our coastal policy, funneling money into programs that sounded good in theory but have failed to deliver in practice. It’s time to leave behind the illusion that this diversion is our only hope. It’s not. The real hope lies in doing what we know works—projects that protect lives, lower insurance costs, and strengthen Louisiana’s coast for future generations.

Let’s get to work on saving the coast—not with ideas that look good on paper, but with actions that make a real difference in the lives of the people who call this place home.

Written and submitted by the Office of Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser


LINK
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20484 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:48 pm to
Fuk thay fat corrupt bastard.
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
14798 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land

Big fella knows he’s only going to be around for a limited time, and wants political results NOW.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
25424 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:50 pm to
I have zero knowledge of the Diversion. Can anyone who knows more tell me if Nungesser is correct that the Diversion would basically destroying Barataria Bay, and that there are solutions - barrier islands, ridges and berms - that are ready to roll right now?
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6798 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile, there are proven, practical solutions ready to go:


Those that will cost more money, provide less impact, and have to be rebuilt regularly after storms...
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20484 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:54 pm to
One of the rare times I would be okay with the feds saying FU, we are pushing this through, state and local be damn.

Honestly the ACOE should be the one heading up and paying for all these projects sense it is the levees they put in place that are causing the issues.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
15540 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?



did they actually all die or just swim to saltier water?
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72561 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Written and submitted by the Office of Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser
Often overlooked
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41114 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land


How long did it take to lose the land? It wasn’t a short term occurrence or development, it took 100 years
Posted by slidingstop
Member since Jan 2025
1631 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay


Didn't realize Barataria Bay is land locked and the dolphins can't simply swim to saltier water.


quote:

For too long, outside organizations and special interests have shaped our coastal policy


You mean groups like the Oyster Fisherman's lobby? Holy irony, Batman.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33771 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:03 pm to
Is he right or wrong? I don't know much about this issue.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82009 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:15 pm to
That dude is the definition of corrupt Louisiana politics. Somehow his family will be profiting off whatever stance he has
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 2:17 pm
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71053 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:16 pm to
frick that slimy cocksucker.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8086 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Gulf of Mexico


Cannot believe he didn't put Gulf of America

quote:

Now, we want to divert that same water into the Barataria Basin, a basin with tidal movement of less than two feet daily, compared to the Gulf’s 10 to 15 feet.


Never heard of that large a tidal range in the Gulf
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 9:17 pm
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
18388 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:21 pm to
Nungesser and plaquemines are going to get what they deserve the next time a storm comes. This was such a short sighted decision to benefit him and his oyster fishermen buddies at the cost of the entire state.


Fortunately, his area will be one of the most impacted by fat boys stupidity.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 2:22 pm
Posted by Spasweezy
Unfortunately, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2014
7160 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:23 pm to
He’s a fat and corrupt piece of shite. Slimy arse Louisiana good ole boy network.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
20097 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population



Is this guy fricking serious?


quote:

Let’s get to work on saving the coast


This a-hole has been in politics for 40 fricking years. He needs to look in the fricking mirror.



Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
21691 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it.


Huh?!
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49811 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

A study by the Saint Andrew Institute, commissioned by the Marine Mammal Commission, shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?
No, that is not an extinction. That is a relocation. Their presence in what should be LAND is an invasion
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
14591 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it


Give me a large fricking break.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram