- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser letter on cancellation of $3 billion Mid-Barataria Diversion
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:46 pm
quote:
BATON ROUGE – When the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion was first proposed, it was presented as a silver bullet to save coastal Louisiana. At that time, the project was projected to cost $250 million. Today, the price tag has ballooned to more than $3 billion—and that doesn’t even begin to account for the long-term environmental and economic costs this project could impose on our communities.
We now know more than we did when this diversion was conceived. A study by the Saint Andrew Institute, commissioned by the Marine Mammal Commission, shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?
Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it. We already saw the largest Gulf of Mexico dead zone in recorded history last year—over 7,000 square miles of lifeless water. That dead zone is directly tied to river-borne nutrients. Now, we want to divert that same water into the Barataria Basin, a basin with tidal movement of less than two feet daily, compared to the Gulf’s 10 to 15 feet. The result? A chokehold on the estuary that will kill oysters, shrimp, and every creature that depends on balanced salinity levels.
What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land, and even then, the land created will lie below sea level. It won’t stop storm surge. It won’t reduce insurance rates. It won’t protect our homes.
Meanwhile, there are proven, practical solutions ready to go: building barrier islands, ridges, and berms that offer real, measurable protection today. These projects reduce storm surge, protect wildlife, and preserve our coastal culture. They offer hope—right now—for a future where families can live, work, and thrive along the Louisiana coast.
I applaud Governor Jeff Landry and CPRA Chairman Gordy Dove for reevaluating this deeply flawed project and putting Louisiana’s people before politics. It takes courage to admit when the wrong path has been taken and to chart a new course. Their decision to pause and reassess the diversion in light of the facts—not just the fanfare—is a turning point.
For too long, outside organizations and special interests have shaped our coastal policy, funneling money into programs that sounded good in theory but have failed to deliver in practice. It’s time to leave behind the illusion that this diversion is our only hope. It’s not. The real hope lies in doing what we know works—projects that protect lives, lower insurance costs, and strengthen Louisiana’s coast for future generations.
Let’s get to work on saving the coast—not with ideas that look good on paper, but with actions that make a real difference in the lives of the people who call this place home.
Written and submitted by the Office of Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser
LINK
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:48 pm to ragincajun03
Fuk thay fat corrupt bastard.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:49 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land
Big fella knows he’s only going to be around for a limited time, and wants political results NOW.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:50 pm to ragincajun03
I have zero knowledge of the Diversion. Can anyone who knows more tell me if Nungesser is correct that the Diversion would basically destroying Barataria Bay, and that there are solutions - barrier islands, ridges and berms - that are ready to roll right now?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:50 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Meanwhile, there are proven, practical solutions ready to go:
Those that will cost more money, provide less impact, and have to be rebuilt regularly after storms...
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:54 pm to ragincajun03
One of the rare times I would be okay with the feds saying FU, we are pushing this through, state and local be damn.
Honestly the ACOE should be the one heading up and paying for all these projects sense it is the levees they put in place that are causing the issues.
Honestly the ACOE should be the one heading up and paying for all these projects sense it is the levees they put in place that are causing the issues.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:56 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?
did they actually all die or just swim to saltier water?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:56 pm to ragincajun03
quote:Often overlooked
Written and submitted by the Office of Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:59 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
What’s most frustrating is that after spending so much money and so many years promoting this plan, they still can’t point to any short-term benefit. The diversion would take decades—if not generations—to build land
How long did it take to lose the land? It wasn’t a short term occurrence or development, it took 100 years
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:02 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay
Didn't realize Barataria Bay is land locked and the dolphins can't simply swim to saltier water.
quote:
For too long, outside organizations and special interests have shaped our coastal policy
You mean groups like the Oyster Fisherman's lobby? Holy irony, Batman.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:03 pm to ragincajun03
Is he right or wrong? I don't know much about this issue.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:15 pm to ragincajun03
That dude is the definition of corrupt Louisiana politics. Somehow his family will be profiting off whatever stance he has
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:16 pm to ragincajun03
frick that slimy cocksucker.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:19 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Gulf of Mexico
Cannot believe he didn't put Gulf of America
quote:
Now, we want to divert that same water into the Barataria Basin, a basin with tidal movement of less than two feet daily, compared to the Gulf’s 10 to 15 feet.
Never heard of that large a tidal range in the Gulf
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:21 pm to ragincajun03
Nungesser and plaquemines are going to get what they deserve the next time a storm comes. This was such a short sighted decision to benefit him and his oyster fishermen buddies at the cost of the entire state.
Fortunately, his area will be one of the most impacted by fat boys stupidity.
Fortunately, his area will be one of the most impacted by fat boys stupidity.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:23 pm to ragincajun03
He’s a fat and corrupt piece of shite. Slimy arse Louisiana good ole boy network.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:23 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population
Is this guy fricking serious?
quote:
Let’s get to work on saving the coast
This a-hole has been in politics for 40 fricking years. He needs to look in the fricking mirror.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:24 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it.
Huh?!
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:25 pm to ragincajun03
quote:No, that is not an extinction. That is a relocation. Their presence in what should be LAND is an invasion
A study by the Saint Andrew Institute, commissioned by the Marine Mammal Commission, shows devastating consequences for our dolphin population—likely pushing them to extinction in Barataria Bay. How can we call this “restoration” when we’re destroying an entire species in the process?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 2:27 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Let’s be clear: this project proposes to dump polluted river water into a delicate estuary system that simply cannot handle it
Give me a large fricking break.
Popular
Back to top

55












