- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hunter Biden Lawyers Impersonating Congressional Staff to Remove Derogatory Evidence
Posted on 7/26/23 at 5:59 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 5:59 am
LINK
Things are awful sketchy in Delaware, as the Hunter Biden case is about to enter court for Judge Maryellen Noreika to review sweetheart plea deal between corrupt DOJ officials and Hunter Biden lawyers.
As the situation unfolded, Congress filed an amicus brief opposing the plea deal and outlining new evidence discovered by the House Oversight Committee so the judge would have additional background on the deal. The amicus filing was done by GOP lawyer Mr. Theodore Kittila, from the committee.
Someone from the defense team, a lawyer later identified as Jessica Bengels from the law firm of Latham and Watkins, then contacted the clerk of the court -falsely claimed to be working with Theodore Kittila- and asked the clerk to remove the amicus filing. The clerk removed the filing.
GOP lawyer Kittila found out and contacted the clerk to understand what was going on. Mr. Kittila then confronted the lawyers for Hunter Biden, and Judge Noreika is a little angry about the Biden team manipulation. COURT ORDER
Things are awful sketchy in Delaware, as the Hunter Biden case is about to enter court for Judge Maryellen Noreika to review sweetheart plea deal between corrupt DOJ officials and Hunter Biden lawyers.
As the situation unfolded, Congress filed an amicus brief opposing the plea deal and outlining new evidence discovered by the House Oversight Committee so the judge would have additional background on the deal. The amicus filing was done by GOP lawyer Mr. Theodore Kittila, from the committee.
Someone from the defense team, a lawyer later identified as Jessica Bengels from the law firm of Latham and Watkins, then contacted the clerk of the court -falsely claimed to be working with Theodore Kittila- and asked the clerk to remove the amicus filing. The clerk removed the filing.
GOP lawyer Kittila found out and contacted the clerk to understand what was going on. Mr. Kittila then confronted the lawyers for Hunter Biden, and Judge Noreika is a little angry about the Biden team manipulation. COURT ORDER
30
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:05 am to cajunangelle
Nothing
Will
Happen
Will
Happen
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:08 am to hogcard1964
Cruz is all over this on his podcast this AM. He has been laying it all out these past few episodes.
Recommended listening whether you like Cruz or not.
Verdict with Ted Cruz
Recommended listening whether you like Cruz or not.
Verdict with Ted Cruz
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 7:25 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:15 am to cajunangelle
when the laws dont apply, why would they follow?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:20 am to cajunangelle
I mentioned in the other thread that this is a big moment for the federal judiciary. They can try to restore some trust that they are objective and care about the law or they can confirm that they cower to government, help the rich & powerful, won't punish misconduct, endorse a two tiered system of justice and so forth.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:22 am to cajunangelle
It's disgusting this shows the case is already treated as yesterday's news by the MSM.
Secondly, it shows the Dems will openly lie, cheat and steal to tilt the system in their favor and not receive any MSM coverage or any backlash. As we've seen, the hand wringing by GOP reps on Fox doesn't go anywhere.
Secondly, it shows the Dems will openly lie, cheat and steal to tilt the system in their favor and not receive any MSM coverage or any backlash. As we've seen, the hand wringing by GOP reps on Fox doesn't go anywhere.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:26 am to cajunangelle
The Biden team's response is that this was "an unfortunate miscommunication" with no nefarious intent.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:35 am to cajunangelle
... but these same people would never rig an election. Never.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:45 am to cajunangelle
I'm shocked!
Not really.
Lying/cheating is their only way to win anything.
Not really.
Lying/cheating is their only way to win anything.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:47 am to cajunangelle
That's the kind of thing that should permanently disbar someone.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:50 am to Crimson
What I would like is for one of these Republican chest thumpers to actually DO SOMETHING!
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:52 am to cajunangelle
The explanation of "there was a miscommunication" is weak and while most Americans disapprove of the deal, this attempt will be viewed as Hunter's legal team attempting to remove damaging evidence. The more the Biden's attempt to run from the corruption, the more their guilt is displayed in the court of public opinion.
LINK
quote:
The majority of voters (55 percent) disapprove of Hunter's plea deal, with 41 percent “strongly” disapproving, while 37 percent approve. Asked if there is a “two-tier” justice system in America, 57 percent of voters agree and 35 percent disagree.
LINK
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:55 am to Crimson
quote:
Cruz is all over this on his podcast this AM. He has been laying it all out these past few episodes.
Bitching on a podcast is all they ever do.. When some Democrat finally goes to jail, or hangs from the neck till dead, I will finally believe these guys are not all on the same team. Hell, for all we know Cruz may be in bed with Newsome and want Biden gone to clear a path. I don't trust any of them anymore. NONE OF THEM.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:57 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
Hell, for all we know Cruz may be in bed with Newsome and want Biden gone to clear a path
Absolutely insane
Posted on 7/26/23 at 6:59 am to cajunangelle
It would appear that a staff member with Latham (Hunter Biden‘s counsel) communicated with the court regarding an amicus brief filed by counsel for congressional Republicans (GOP Counsel). Apparently, that brief included exhibits which should not have been filed in the public record (due to the inclusion of personal information) pursuant to a local rule of that Delaware court, and the Latham staffer asked court personnel what steps were necessary under local rules to have the pleading removed. it would appear that the clerk’s office pulled the pleading from the file, pending a resolution.
The claim is that this Latham staff member represented herself to be affiliated with GOP Counsel. if true, that would obviously be problematic. But that seems unlikely … given that she provided the court with her name and her Latham phone number. if she was trying to be sneaky, she did a poor job of it.
The claim is that this Latham staff member represented herself to be affiliated with GOP Counsel. if true, that would obviously be problematic. But that seems unlikely … given that she provided the court with her name and her Latham phone number. if she was trying to be sneaky, she did a poor job of it.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 7:03 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:11 am to Crimson
quote:
Cruz is all over this on his podcast
Link by chance?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:17 am to cajunangelle
Judge will probably just give her a $350 fine and a strongly worded letter.
The judge will then accept the plea deal on Friday afternoon then they will all meet at the country club for cocktail hour.
The judge will then accept the plea deal on Friday afternoon then they will all meet at the country club for cocktail hour.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 7:19 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:17 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But that seems unlikely … given that she provided the court with her name and her Latham phone number. if she was trying to be sneaky, she did a poor job of it.
Well that’s not even completely what they are saying. They are saying they called from their firms number, which typically shows up on caller ID.
So what we are left with is “I didn’t say I was with the other firm, I said I was with my firm, not sure how there was a misunderstanding.”
Sounds like bullshite.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:24 am to AggieHank86
Interesting that they submitted Ms Bengel’s explanation as a Declaration rather than a sworn Affidavit. Her explanation makes sense and sounds like an everyday staff call/inquiry to the clerk’s office, which do sometimes delve into the land of confusion. However, I’d really like to hear the clerk’s side of the story as well for comparison because it sounds like the clerk has a much different version.
It will likely be chalked up as a she said/she said scenario that was a misunderstanding, the judge will do nothing [or give the court’s oral version of a strongly worded letter of reprimand] and will then proceed to dole out a gentle slap on the wrist to Hunter.
It will likely be chalked up as a she said/she said scenario that was a misunderstanding, the judge will do nothing [or give the court’s oral version of a strongly worded letter of reprimand] and will then proceed to dole out a gentle slap on the wrist to Hunter.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:26 am to cajunangelle
There is no repercussions for lying.
We will descend into a totalitarian state.
We will descend into a totalitarian state.
Page 1 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News