re: Steph Curry doesnt want poor minorities to live near him

It's a state mandate.
Good ol' Gavin Newsome.

quote:

---

The council for the richest town in America has begrudgingly agreed to rezone parts of its “poverty pocket” of multi-million dollar homes to make way for more affordable housing amid a pressing deadline to submit its state-mandated housing plan.

If the state rejects Atherton’s updated plan — which also includes a property adjacent to Redwood City — it could lose local development control altogether, putting at risk the bucolic mansion-studded small-town vibe it’s worked years to preserve.

More commonly known as upzoning, some properties will be rezoned to allow more housing — a hot topic since the California HOME Act, which makes it easier for homeowners to subdivide an existing lot, went into effect at the beginning of last year. Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislators are pushing to increase the state’s supply of affordable, multi-family housing and slow-growth, but affluent Bay Area suburbs such as Atherton are pushing back.

---

quote:

---

Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislators are pushing to increase the state’s supply of affordable, multi-family housing and slow-growth, but affluent Bay Area suburbs such as Atherton are pushing back.

---

And as soon as he’s out of politics he’ll fight any low income housing developments that try and locate near his home.

quote:

---

Does Curry have a history of doing this or specifically advocating for those policies?

---

He's all in on diversity and equity. There's a lot of political baggage that comes along with that. He'll talk the talk until someone wants to move the poors next to him.

quote:

---

You're likely to have more crime around low income areas so yes

---

So, what’s the threshold value of one’s personal home where it’s okay to be concerned with such things, since you tied it to his $30 million one?

quote:

---

You’re a character from Portlandia.

---

quote:

---

I don't see the problem If I lived in a 30 million dollar home I wouldn't want a low income housing development being built down the street either

---

Of course you don’t see the problem. You are of the “rules for thee, not for me” mindset.

It’s completely hypocritical to support policies and politicians that argue for completely unfettered immigration to this country then argue against any of “those” people being in your sight.

quote:

---

Of course you don't. Philosophical consistency has never been strong with your kind.

---

Appeal to hypocrisy is a logical fallacy, though. No one wants trashy apartments in their neighborhood. That's just a fact, and that fact reveals very little about any question of policy.

You mean this guy?