Started By
Message

Listening to an FSU Podcast

Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:06 am
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9140 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:06 am
The are breaking down the game and it is interesting to hear how outsiders view our team. They are mostly fair and aren't beating their chest or anything. their basic thoughts:

1) overall our team is inexperienced and/or transfers. They hope this will create issues.

2) only 2 position groups they feel at a disadvantage is DL and WR. They think the game will come down to whether or not they can create some sort of running game and making sure Kayshon doesn't go for 80 yards on any particular play. Hope is that they can get the DL to over pursue and let their RBs find cutbacks.

3) Our OL is very inexperienced and a bunch of guys are playing out of position (Frazier and Dellinger).

4) Lbers don't scare them and the secondary is all transfers that were average at best at their previous stops.

5) RBs are average. No Emery and no Fournette type back.

6) QB is either a RS freshman or a transfer that doesn't have much chemistry with the WRs.

7) They think that LSU is ripe for the picking if FSU can limit the advantage LSU has at DL and WR.

I obviously don't agree with all of their points but it is interesting to hear. They really only talked about LSU during the podcast but I did notice they never mentioned where they thought FSU had the advantage.

My question would be if LSU has 2 position advantages and its a push across the board elsewhere then what's the path for FSU to win?

If they keep safeties back to limit Kayshon then how do they stop the run and stop Nabers and Bech from carving you up underneath?

If you max protect to stop the DL, can you get open with limited route runners?

How does your OL move our DL to run the ball?

Posted by BROpaneTANK
Mandeville
Member since Apr 2010
2864 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:08 am to
One thing that always seems to get ignored in peoples analysis is the fact that a top 5 coach in football in Kelly is going against a guy that no one was sold would even be retained last year. Seems like quite a large advantage.

Also go look at FSU’s recruiting classes the last 3 years and try to sell me we’re only more talented in two position groups.


Edit: Just because Norvel had success in one game (still lost) doesn’t change the fact that coaching is an advantage. Having Nick Saban is still an advantage against Jimbo Fisher, just like Brian Kelly and his 30 years of success is an advantage against the guy that lost to Jacksonville State the week after losing to Brian’s team. And that was my only point. That when analyzing a matchup you have to consider coaching just like anything else.
This post was edited on 8/30/22 at 3:06 pm
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37141 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:09 am to
Good post
Posted by fastlane
Member since Jul 2014
2446 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:09 am to
Interesting how they try to rationalize things that any other fan will know just aren’t true. Makes you realize how we may do that in a sense.
Posted by bayou85
Concordia
Member since Sep 2016
8681 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

only 2 position groups they feel at a disadvantage is DL and WR


a DL advantage is huge tho. That's where games are won and lost. duquesene actually made some plays on FSU's OL but they couldn't tackle. I think FSU will try to run right at us early and realize that its not happening and have to pivot.
Posted by Tmar1no
Member since Jan 2014
435 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:11 am to
Thank you for doing the lords work so I don't have to
Posted by Tmar1no
Member since Jan 2014
435 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:15 am to
Isn't half of their team transfers? If true, one game against Duq does not magically give great chemistry. So their opinion of LSU's transfer chemistry issue is the same as their own.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8243 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:18 am to
I mean they aren't necessarily wrong with some of their points, but that doesn't mean they actually have an advantage. For example, they say are LB's are average. That may very well be true, but if our LB's are average, what do they consider theirs? They can argue that we aren't great at some positions sure, but that doesn't mean that they are better than us.
Posted by DCTXLA
Member since Jul 2022
3459 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:18 am to
Sounds like a very biased perspective to be honest.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
31089 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:19 am to
Wanted to post:


So I did

But that was a really good run down of what they are saying, none of which is terribly off base.

Thanks
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

RBs are average. No Emery and no Fournette type back.




They're in for a rude awakening with Goodwin. Telling you that right now. It's fair to say that now based on production but this is your starter for a reason. He has deceptive speed but he's compact in power. I'm surprised they didn't start him last year as a true freshman.
This post was edited on 8/30/22 at 11:22 am
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18452 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:22 am to
Key to the game is get up on them early and get them out of their first run offense.
Posted by charminultra
Member since Jan 2020
2594 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:42 am to
quote:

how do they stop the run and stop Nabers and Bech from carving you up underneath?


they simply don't.
Posted by talmaniandevil_25
Member since Jan 2020
2571 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:51 am to
Kayshon isn’t our only receiver haha. We have a beast of a receiving corps. Good luck.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14814 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:53 am to
These are all issues that this board has discussed over and over the past couple of weeks. All speculation about how LSU plays together once the game is real.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16660 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:56 am to
quote:

7) They think that LSU is ripe for the picking if FSU can limit the advantage LSU has at DL and WR.


I would also agree but those advantages LSU has are monumental.
Posted by TigerinKorea
Member since Aug 2014
8315 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

They think that LSU is ripe for the picking if FSU can limit the advantage LSU has at DL and WR.


They’re not exactly wrong. We’re breaking in a new coaching staff, and it’s the first game of the season at a neutral site against a power 5 opponent. If there is a time to steal a win from LSU, it’s this week.
This post was edited on 8/30/22 at 12:00 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119176 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 12:03 pm to
On defense I expect LSU to be pretty basic the first 2.5 quarters by rushing 4 on run downs and 3 maybe four on pass downs. Depending on the flow of the game I can see the LSU defense start to mix in some exotic blitzes and stunts at the line around the middle of the third quarter.

On offense I expect the LSU offense to be run heavy then mix in play action. I can see the TEs (both Mason and Kole), Bech and Nabors (if not injured) having a good night as the FSU CBs focus on Kayshon. Kayshon will have a couple or three big plays late.
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
10255 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

4) Lbers don't scare them and the secondary is all transfers that were average at best at their previous stops.


this is what worries me....the new starters were at McNeese and ULL last year.
Posted by Colonel Angus
Member since Aug 2007
1653 posts
Posted on 8/30/22 at 12:06 pm to
Most of that is fairly accurate and fair.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram