lsufan1971

Ended up with a Ranger XP1000 XPS premium pursuit Camo from ATV zone. Good people and got a good price. Decided on the XP 1000 over the 900 because of heavier duty chassis and gear box reverse(900 is chain driven for reverse) and more storage than the 900....

La only state to loose jobs in the last 12 months. [link=(https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/dan_fagan/article_dd1deb70-c449-11e9-b146-db3e6d3b99a6.html)]LINK[/link] [quote]A new report out this month should end the debate over whether Louisiana’s economy has fallen behind the re...

[img]https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/21/224/4224021.jpg[/img]...

CEH reminds me of Dalton Hilliard. ...

[quote]How can the government "buy back" what was not theirs in the first place?[/quote] They can't. That is why we have a 4th amendment. That would never pass a SCOTUS test....

Agreed. He can't seem to get his shite straight. He has been more than enough chances IMO. It's a shame too because dude can ball when he puts out the effort. He is a big reason we won Auburn last year. ...

[quote]I think the Evans sweepstakes is still on.[/quote] It is far from over. ...

Probably get some down votes. Jamie Howard came back for his senior year after having a terrible junior season. He helped Gerry bring back the magic. He has been a great Tiger off the field and regularly supports the university. All the shite he took would make most men ball up in a corner in a fetal...

Looking at trading my 2015 570 Crew Camo EPS. Looking at moving up to a 900or 1000. ATVZ quoted me 15811.00 OTD on a 900 Camo EPS not including my trade. Should I go ahead and get the 1000? My bike is in good shape less than 500 miles. Has plastic roof, Polaris 3500 lb winch, aftermarket 27” tire...

I stand corrected ...

Part of this entire issue is democrats do not educate themselves on the issue. For instance 1.) Many Democrats believe you can go on the internet buy a gun and have it shipped directly to your home (Obama said this in a town hall in 2016) 2.) Many believe that anyone can go to a gun show and b...

[quote]The term “assault weapon” get thrown around, really need a specific definition[/quote] The word assault is a verb in this context. The gun that sits in the safe and is never fired can never assault anything. It's like calling a spoon or fork that a fat person uses a gorging device. ...

[quote]Just don't tell me there's no such thing as an "assault weapon", because that's just sticking your head in the sand while they erode what all firearms we'll be legally allowed to keep.[/quote] There isn't one at the federal level which you have been arguing throughout this whole thread. Fe...

[quote]Not many people own these firearms as they are difficult to procure and I don't believe a single one has been used in a mass shooting on US soil.[/quote] There are abround 630K registered machine guns in the NFA registry and I don't believe there has been but a handful of crimes committed ...

Trying to make this simple with a picture. The 94 banned any weapon below that had 2 of the items. The new ban will ban any weapon that has 1. The dems already have a bill written with that language. [img]https://i0.wp.com/mikethegunguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ar2.jpg?ssl=1[/img]...

[quote]that definition still stands, even if the lawfulness of the weapons described has changed.[/quote] Again you don't understand how the law works. You can't have a precedent from a law that technically doesn't exist. [quote]I'm going to go a head and assume that when lawmakers are talk...

[quote]They already HAVE come up with a definition, even if it was not a good definition, it is a legal one and that's all they need to prosecute people for possession of illegal arms.[/quote] You really don't know how the law works do you. ...

[quote]If people want to pretend that there's no such thing as an "assault weapon", then I will cite the law that defined what an "assault weapon" is for the purposes of federal law[/quote] You're citing a legal definition that no longer exist. That law had a sunset clause in 2004. ...

[quote]Everyone wants me to tell them what it is because they're too lazy to look up the law for themselves. And you think I'm the idiot.[/quote] The new law will be more restrictive than the 94 law. The 94 law allowed 2 From your link [quote]a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to acce...

[quote]That part of that gun control law expired a few years ago[/quote] Negative ghostrider. The Hughes amendment signed by Reagan went into effect May 19,1986 and is still in effect today. Any machinegun manufactured after that date cannot be transferred to an individual....