Started By
Message

re: Unless Coach O explodes... It's Herman, Jimbo, then CEO

Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by glaucon
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2008
5292 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Don't disagree...I'm just arguing that doing that as an interim is not, in my opinion, the same thing as doing it as the head guy form day one of your own program. Fundamentally, I think we're talking apples and oranges.

In both cases, Orgeron will have had the luxury of taking over programs and being able to swing for the fences with essentially no pressure...unless you consider the potential that he could win the job as pressure. I think you behave differently when that's your role versus when it's not...and unfortunately, the only time he's not been the interim was as the HC at OM.


It isn't quite the same thing as doing it as an interim but it isn't that different. He would have done everything the head man has to do except recruit and hire a competent staff. I don't think anyone has any reservations about his abilities as a recruiter so you are really talking about not hiring him based solely on your guess that he can't competently hire a staff.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23444 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

O is the answer



In the multiple choice question of who should be LSU's next Coach, O is always the answer.. #AllinforO
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
33463 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

so you are really talking about not hiring him based solely on your guess that he can't competently hire a staff.
or handle coaches and players on a day to day basis. Or handle the numerous types of adversity that will come his way. how does he react when he loses a star player to injury? or when half of his defense decides to go pro after their junior year? or when a coordinator leaves because the Administration presents them with stupid clauses in their contracts? Or when he loses a close game because of a mistake he personally made during the game? Or when their is some division in the lockerroom?

Most likely, he won't have to handle anything close to what a normal head coach would day to day. Heck, he's spending so much time politicking for the full-time job that i'm surprised he gets any credit at all for our performance against Missouri.

There are lots of factors that you are minimizing to "recruit and hire assistants". And CEO hasn't proven he can do any of those things well. Other coaches have already proven such. Some at multiple schools.
This post was edited on 10/4/16 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34924 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

how does he react when he loses a star player to injury?




Oh, you mean like fournette?


I think he'd probably put up 600+ yards of total offense


quote:

he's spending so much time politicking for the full-time job



Yea man, those two minute interview segments are fricking brutal... how the heck did he even find time to get dressed for the game???




I'm not 100% certain that CEO is the man for the job but your points are absolutely fricking retarded


This post was edited on 10/4/16 at 12:47 pm
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24172 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying he's a bad coach, but it's looking more and more as though he owes much of his success to Winston


Winston was his QB for 2 years 2013-2014. In 2012 they won 12 games including ACC champ game and the Orange bowl. He has won 10 or more games in 5 of his 6 seasons.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29103 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

. how does he react when he loses a star player to injury?
As Hangover mentioned, he passed this first test pretty well.
quote:

or when half of his defense decides to go pro after their junior year?
He is a recruiter at heart. I believe the bench will always be full of capable guys ready to play.
quote:

or when a coordinator leaves because the Administration presents them with stupid clauses in their contracts?
He probably has quite a few coaching connections considering it is his life's work.
quote:

Or when he loses a close game because of a mistake he personally made during the game?
He already said they will make mistakes, but they will make them at full speed and correct them at full speed.
quote:

Or when their is some division in the lockerroom?
"One team, one heartbeat". Sure it's just a phrase, but it's hard to argue with what we saw Saturday. And I'm pretty sure he isn't one to take much bullshite.
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7266 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

. Not many coaches are going to want to jump in bed with Arkansas, Bama, Ole Miss, aTm and Auburn when Texas is the alternate option


I've said it once and I'll keep saying it every time i read this type of comment:

If a coach is too scared to coach in the SEC it's best he not be at LSU. I'm not trying to say you are wrong about Herman, btw. I'm just saying if that's his logic then he wouldn't have survived here anyway.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

One team, one heartbeat". Sure it's just a phrase, but it's hard to argue with what we saw Saturday. And I'm pretty sure he isn't one to take much bullshite




I can't think of anyone that's a better fit for LSU right now than coach O and if he makes a decent showing the job should be his.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29103 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

In 2012 they won 12 games including ACC champ game and the Orange bowl
They beat a grand total of 2 ranked teams that year, counting N. Illinois who, let's face it, should NOT have been in the Orange Bowl (their signature win was against Kent fricking State, in OT). Their other win against a ranked team was Clemson, who failed to win a game against a ranked team during the regular season. And that ACC champ game was against a 6-6 GT who also failed to beat a ranked team all season, and the game was close. They also struggled - HARD - against a 6-6 VT team that - say it with me - failed to beat a ranked team all year.

Jimbo is not a great coach.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22964 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

They beat a grand total of 2 ranked teams that year, counting N. Illinois who, let's face it, should NOT have been in the Orange Bowl (their signature win was against Kent fricking State, in OT). Their other win against a ranked team was Clemson, who failed to win a game against a ranked team during the regular season. And that ACC champ game was against a 6-6 GT who also failed to beat a ranked team all season, and the game was close. They also struggled - HARD - against a 6-6 VT team that - say it with me - failed to beat a ranked team all year.


This. All of this.

10 wins in the ACC should be a minimum.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26129 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

They beat a grand total of 2 ranked teams that year, counting N. Illinois who, let's face it, should NOT have been in the Orange Bowl (their signature win was against Kent fricking State, in OT). Their other win against a ranked team was Clemson, who failed to win a game against a ranked team during the regular season. And that ACC champ game was against a 6-6 GT who also failed to beat a ranked team all season, and the game was close. They also struggled - HARD - against a 6-6 VT team that - say it with me - failed to beat a ranked team all year.



But what we all really want to know is did he get shut out by a team coming off a 17-game conference losing streak?
This post was edited on 10/4/16 at 1:22 pm
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

You do it twice, you are not the coach that went 10-27 at Ole Miss a decade ago.


Do what twice? Have a winning percentage above .500 in a given season?

Here's what USC did with Orgeron as the interim head coach -

Wins

Arizona (8-5)
Utah (5-7)
Oregon State (7-6)
California (1-11)
Stanford (11-3)
Colorado (4-8)

Lossess


Notre Dame (9-4)
UCLA (10-3)

So USC played three teams that ultimately lost four games or fewer...and he lost to two of them.

Other than Stanford, not one team USC beat with Ed at the helm finished with fewer than five losses.

The simple fact is that Ed is being considered because he's a charismatic Cajun that loves Louisiana. And that's the only reason.

No other coach on this staff would have the opportunity to become the permanent head coach of the program if they were promoted to the interim position in place of Orgeron.

No other prominent power 5 program would hire a guy with a losing record as a head coach. Not even Syracuse gave Orgeron a chance for their head coaching vacancy last year, even after Ed publicly stated that he would "very much" be interested in the position.

Imagine if Alabama hired Burton Burns to be their head coach after Saban retires. Or if Ohio State gave Luke Fickell the head coaching position if Urban stepped down. Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?

This would be an embarrassing hire for the program.



Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290650 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:35 pm to
I love Coach O as a person, and love his energy. but that isnt what makes great coaches. If he truly delegates and hires strong assistants, it could work. If he could keep a guy like Austin Thomas around, it could work.

Things I like about Coach O

-great energy

-recruiting

- has shown some progressiveness & seems to have his own ideas(compared to Miles). Ie bringing old players back, dialing down practice time, throwing players like Gage in that he may have felt deserved a chance.

-if he is a true delegator to his assistants, that is a good thing. I think he must keep a guy like Austin Thomas around


Things i worry about

-Inexperience
-game planning
-sanctions that seemed to follow his time at Miami, USC & Ole Miss(pending).
-executive decision making, esp emotional vs sensible
-hiring good ole baws(ie Pete Jenkins). Is he going to try & reward old friends as opposed to best man for job?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29103 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

So USC played three teams that ultimately lost four games or fewer...and he lost to two of them.

Other than Stanford, not one team USC beat with Ed at the helm finished with fewer than five losses.
That sounds an awful lot like the pattern Jimbo has at FSU.

Difference is, USC under O handily beat the teams they were supposed to beat, whereas Jimbo tends to struggle against mediocre teams.
Posted by TigerOne
Member since Sep 2007
1944 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:47 pm to
I think he means a 10 game winning streak.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27454 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

it's looking more and more as though he owes much of his success to Winston.
every national champion winner has benefited from great players...and Winston was just part of a good team.
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
25666 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

-hiring good ole baws(ie Pete Jenkins). Is he going to try & reward old friends as opposed to best man for job?


If he hires more coaches that are of Pete Jenkins caliber, he would build something pretty special.

But I think he would hire the best coaches he could get. Defensively, we are set as long as we can get Aranda to stick around.

I think he would try to get a big time OC that has a reputation of developing QBs.

This is all assuming we can't get Fisher or Herman or he goes undefeated the rest of the way. He wouldn't be that expensive and that'd leave more money for high end coaches.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22964 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

every national champion winner has benefited from great players...and Winston was just part of a good team.


Sure, the rest of that team was extremely talented. But, I think Jimbo, as a coach, is somewhere between what he was with Winston and what he was without Winston, which makes him somewhere around a 10 win coach IN THE ACC.

What's that translate to when he faces 3-4 teams with equal or better talent per year rather than 1-2?
This post was edited on 10/4/16 at 1:57 pm
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
17705 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Jimbo tends to struggle against mediocre teams.

You keep dissecting their struggles, yet keep conveniently ignoring 2013 when their average margin of victory was 42 points and no one got within 2 touchdowns of them until the NCG.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

That sounds an awful lot like the pattern Jimbo has at FSU.




So what's the argument?

That we should ignore Orgeron's abysmal failures at Ole Miss, because it was "10 years ago", and view his 6-2 interim record at USC as a superior accomplishment to Jimbo's 71-16 record at Florida State?

I'll keep making this point - no other coach on this staff would be given the opportunity to win the permanent head coaching job if they were promoted to the interim position, regardless of the results they produced. Not Peveto. Not Cameron. Not Raymond. Not Ensmniger.

But O is given the interim position, and suddenly, this turns into an "audition". And the reason for that is completely separate from any perceived or actual competency he has as a head coach.

And that's a problem.

This post was edited on 10/4/16 at 2:12 pm
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram