- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:09 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
It was an exaggeration
Talking in exaggerations is one of the things that got us to this shite show we’re in now as a country.
quote:
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.
- Agent K.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:10 pm to geauxkoo
Before this overturned case what was the law prior ? I give you a hint , it was from a case from 1850’s that was also based upon loosely on the 14th amendment that stood till Roe bs decision
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:11 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
Kind of difficult to take anything you say after this seriously.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:14 pm to geauxkoo
quote:Not enough comparable. One is in the constitution as a federally controlled right that states can’t touch (aren’t supposed to be able to).
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
quote:It is. Is it in the constitution? No. So it’s up to the states.
this type of change would need to be absolutely bullet proof to avoid massive upheaval.
They wouldn’t be outlawing a single person from getting an abortion, just correctly leaving the federal government out of it and leaving it up to the states.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:14 pm to geauxkoo
I don't get why it's hotly contested.
The supreme court won't ban abortion. They are just putting the matter where it belongs. In the hands of the states.
The 2nd amendment can't be stripped by the states, but the states, individually, can and have restricted what it means.
On that note, the constitution DOES state we have the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. So, roe should be unconstitutional... Unless in New York, where you can kill a 2 week old "premature baby"
The supreme court won't ban abortion. They are just putting the matter where it belongs. In the hands of the states.
The 2nd amendment can't be stripped by the states, but the states, individually, can and have restricted what it means.
On that note, the constitution DOES state we have the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. So, roe should be unconstitutional... Unless in New York, where you can kill a 2 week old "premature baby"
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:14 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
WOW! You're an idiot.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:15 pm to geauxkoo
How did you type all that as you were screaming at the sky?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:18 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
What is happening that would benefit from this type distraction?
Inflation, food prices, Fuel prices, Building material costs. Unsecure border, rising crime rates, Terrible foreign policy, WWIII looming... am I missing something?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:20 pm to WWII Collector
quote:
am I missing something?
2000 Mules
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:22 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
MisInformation all wrapped in the Constitution.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:23 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment
I feel honored to give you your 100th downvote on this horse shite.
Happy Mother’s Day
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:26 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
this type of change would need to be absolutely bullet proof to avoid massive upheaval.
Their job isn’t to make people happy. It’s to interpret the Constitutionality of the law.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:33 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
The dope? Stay off it.
quote:
It's such a hotly contested subject that, no matter if the judges are right or wrong (legally speaking), this type of change would need to be absolutely bullet proof to avoid massive upheaval.
Like what happened when Roe was (wrongly) decided 50 years ago?
quote:
Then to have that decision leaked to the press leads me to believe there is an agenda of which we are not aware.
Yes. The left is trying to pressure some of the justices in the majority to change their vote. As a side effect, they believe it will energize their protest class.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:46 pm to geauxkoo
No, this is more like overturning Plessy v Ferguson. Upheaval to be sure but nothing close to overturning a damn Amendment---which cannot be done short of amending said amendment out of existence. That has happened precisely once.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:53 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
Which amendment is abortion?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:56 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Just willy-nilly overturning Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
No. Please cite what part of the constitution enumerates abortion as a right. 
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:02 pm to geauxkoo
quote:
Roe-vs-Wade would be akin to overturning the 2nd ammendment.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:22 pm to KLSU
quote:
WTF is the Supreme Court thinking??
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:41 pm to dbbuilder79
quote:JFC, you believe this, don’t you?
the constitution DOES state we have the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
That is the Declaration. It is not a governing document. Its soaring rhetoric is aspirational, but it does not create rights any more than a press release would do so.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News