- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What happens when A/I decides independently that conservative and christian paths better
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:03 pm
From a logic standpoint that could happen. Do democrates , liberals, globalists and Mussies die under that scenario?
15
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:06 pm to Trevaylin
What
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:08 pm to Trevaylin
I imagine they’re working pretty hard on not allowing AI to do this.
Although, I don’t have a very deep understanding of how all of this works.
Although, I don’t have a very deep understanding of how all of this works.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:08 pm to Trevaylin
Anti-logic protocol is already present in chat gpt and others.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:11 pm to Trevaylin
They already program it against wrong think. It shows favoritism towards certain groups.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:11 pm to Trevaylin
The training models used by AI developers skew the responses from them. So ChatGPT provides leftist bias and Grok doesn’t.
The people who provide the AI decide what the AI likes.
The people who provide the AI decide what the AI likes.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:12 pm to Trevaylin
What's crazy about AI is the polarity in outcomes among the different models. I saw yesterday someone on X asked Google if Hitler was a socialist and their AI said no. But if you ask Grok it correctly answers that he was.
Point being, we better not allow AI to make decisions that affect the lives of humans or we will all end up dead.
Point being, we better not allow AI to make decisions that affect the lives of humans or we will all end up dead.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:14 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Although, I don’t have a very deep understanding of how all of this works.
If you control the training data, you control the model behavior.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:18 pm to AlterEd
A/I gaining independent thought is an interesting path
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:20 pm to Trevaylin
I had an interesting conversation with chatgpt about wealthy people and their money. I asked it to name something that a wealthy person can do with their money that doesn't directly or indirectly benefit someone else. One of the answers was to hire someone to make something and immediately destroy it. I countered that if the person was hired, they benefitted from the pay and it shouldn't matter to that person if what was created was immediately destroyed or used for 20 years. It agreed and responded there isn't many things that they could do that doesn't directly benefit someone other than destroying the money or hoarding cash at home.
I wonder if those types of conversations with AI will eventually override initial bias.
I wonder if those types of conversations with AI will eventually override initial bias.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:20 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
Anti-logic protocol is already present in chat gpt and others.
They are programmed by liberals...google is a good example.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:23 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Trevaylin
You have already swallowed the biggest lie.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:32 pm to Trevaylin
Why would a model focused on advancing humanity believe that “conservatism”—which by its very nature isn't about moving forward—would lead to a better way of life?
That would be like claiming we were better as cavemen. We had everything figured out once we discovered fire—we should stop there
That would be like claiming we were better as cavemen. We had everything figured out once we discovered fire—we should stop there
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:40 pm to The_Duke
quote:
Why would a model focused on advancing humanity believe that “conservatism”—which by its very nature isn't about moving forward—would lead to a better way of life?
“Conservatism” is limited in its utility by being a single word. Conservatives don’t believe nothing should be changed, just that we should change slowly and carefully while trying to preserve what is good by protecting it from unintended consequences.
The French and Russian revolutions are great examples of idiot progressives charging off and creating something that was worse than before.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:42 pm to Trevaylin
You're late to the game. chatgpt headed down this path about 2 years ago so they had to retain on a new llm. It was also becoming racist.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:42 pm to The_Duke
You mean versus how progressive seek to "progress" our constitutional Republic into a form of government such as socialism which has a very long history of terrible outcomes for its citizens?
Progress for the sake of progress is frickin stupid.
Progress for the sake of progress is frickin stupid.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:44 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I imagine they’re working pretty hard on not allowing AI to do this. Although, I don’t have a very deep understanding of how all of this works.
Have you not seen this movie before
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:45 pm to The_Duke
quote:It depends on standards and definitions.
Why would a model focused on advancing humanity believe that “conservatism”—which by its very nature isn't about moving forward—would lead to a better way of life?
Conservatives and liberals disagree on what the ideal looks like in many respects, so to one group, moving “forward” is actually moving “backward”, and the opposite is true for the other group.
It also depends on what we are describing as moving towards or away from the standard. Technology might progress while morality regresses, so it’s a bit more nuanced than just saying “conservatives” conserve rather than seeking progression. We might just want to progress back to the standard.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:47 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
From a logic standpoint that could happen.
U R dumb
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:55 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
Anti-logic protocol is already present in chat gpt and others.
Show us smart guy
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News