- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7161 |
| Registered on: | 1/11/2023 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for “a credible transition” to democracy in Iran.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned the strikes on Iran risk another Iraq-style quagmire, but said Berlin won’t lecture Washington.
Lining up with the inevitable.
quote:
Starmer lets Trump use UK bases to strike Iran’s missile depots
0
Turns out the UK has a second grooming gang scandal now.
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 8:42 pm
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-uks-new-grooming-gang-scandal/
This one is their taxpayers paying refugees to rape children.
Somehow the UK always outdoes us.
This one is their taxpayers paying refugees to rape children.
quote:
In borderless Britain, it seems as if barely a day goes by without some monstrosity being committed by a migrant who should never have been in the country in the first place. The world is now familiar with the ongoing scandal of Britain’s predominantly Pakistani rape gangs. Yet what is also unfolding right now is a wave of brutal sexual violence committed by illegal arrivals, often asylum seekers from Afghanistan.
Somehow the UK always outdoes us.
quote:
Mulakhil arrived in the UK illegally, crossing the English Channel from France in a small boat in July 2025. This being post-borders Britain, he was not detained or punished for this incursion. He was instead offered free accommodation and financial support, initially in Kent on England’s south coast, before he was relocated to Nuneaton, a quiet market town, where he was placed in social housing, at the taxpayers’ expense. Six weeks later, he approached his 12-year-old victim as she was playing on the swings in a park. His identity was confirmed when, after the attack, he went to purchase some cans of Red Bull in a nearby shop, using the preloaded debit card issued to him by the UK Home Office.
The teachers must be illiterate if they can't teach kids to read one on one.
re: U.S. Centcom: 3 U.S. soldiers killed
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 6:34 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
It isn’t even remotely the norm.
Especially for single moms...
Asking Gemini provides:
quote:
House cleaners are generally hired by households with middle to high incomes, typically starting around $75,000–$100,000+ annually, as hiring often depends more on having disposable income and valuing time than just being extremely wealthy. Common clients include dual-income households, busy professionals, and those in higher cost-of-living areas.
Hmm
quote:
Service Frequency: Households with income around $100k+ might opt for weekly or bi-weekly services, whereas lower-income households might only hire for specialized, one-time, or deep cleanings, says Jobber.
I wonder if they pay 50 an hour weekly...
quote:
The average annual salary for a professional cleaner is roughly $32,000–$35,000, with hourly rates averaging around $14–$21 per hour in the U.S., reports JobberZipRecruiter, and Indeed.
Nopeee.
None of this makes sense...
quote:
My being anti-abortion isn’t enough anymore.
quote:
Joe Biden: Throughout his earlier career, Biden stated he was "personally pro-life" but did not believe he had the right to impose that view on others.
Here we go again.
quote:
Now I have to say I’m anti-abortion for the exact right reasons. Good grief.
No one said there was a right and wrong reason, its specifically about how you define it.
Only you know how you define it and you've been vague for at least 2 years it seems.
quote:
I’m not playing your stupid games. Nothing I say or do will satisfy you.
You've responded to me saying you didnt answer specific questions... and then refused to answer those questions.
You've proven my statements utterly and completely.
quote:
You have a bone to pick with me that is totally unrelated to abortion or theology or anything else you’re willing to actually admit to. I used to wonder why you seemed to turn on me out if nowhere but I’m frankly bored by the sanctimony at this point.
I told you, you hide your actual beleifs, you refuse to define what you mean by something you said for 2 years...
Seriously this is amazing you gave us a performance of an unreliable narrator.
quote:
Here’s 2+ years of me saying that I don’t support abortion and y’all proclaiming that I do anyway.
In any of those do you say
quote:
if you think Abortion is a sin, if it's murder, if you believe women should be allowed to kill their children.
Answer: Not in one of them.
The closest you said was
quote:
but I also believe women that believe abortion is the only answer to an unplanned pregnancy are deserving of support and compassion, as well.
You do understand how you stating you are "Pro-life" means nothing, There are many left wing people who claim to be "pro-life" but support fully legal abortion.
Do you understand how a normal person would decide that you aren't being honest, you are hiding what you actually support, you responded to my very clear questions with a vague term and a non answer.
quote:
Edit: the fixation on my cleaning lady is also bizarre. It’s not unheard of for working parents to hire someone to clean their houses. Many of the parents I know from my kids’ public school also gave housekeepers that come once a week.
Because you openly lied about it on multiple points.
You also attacked me for saying it showed wealth, it does.
quote:
You sure about that twitter?
From 1979...
quote:
Maybe this wakes up Americans as to what our politicians have done to our country the past 20 yrs! Maybe we will rise!
Hopefully this lets them realize ICE is the Hero.
quote:
You always pivot to bizarre personal analyses with me now. You used to have normal discussions. I don’t know what changed.
You lied a number of times, it's the only answer other than you are actually brain damaged level illogical.
I can't trust you to be honest, you purposely hide your views and then accuse others of lying when things you said are mentioned.
Look here with Abortion, you could have very plainly stated if you think Abortion is a sin, if it's murder, if you believe women should be allowed to kill their children. But you will refuse to as you want to claim enhanced deniability in the future.
When people tell you you hold incompatible views that are not logical, you deny, then engage in extremely questionable claims. (Your Maid's salary changed many times, always 2x local rates, First she was here legally but afraid of ICE, then you Never asked her)
Why analysis? Because you are a very unreliable narrator. You had a story about a criminal who was so brutalized by Prison that you couldn't talk about it. Then you spoke later in extreme detail about how an almost identical had been raped by homosexual Juveniles in juvenile detention and that's why he turned to a life of crime and couldn't read.
Beyond all this, you accuse people constantly of not critically thinking, but of all people here, you are by far the least reliable when it comes to critical thinking.
There are two options:
1. You really are dumb, you can't see how illogical you come off, you actually think I'm making stuff up about you because you can't remember your lies.
2. You aren't honest, you are intentionally pushing your views despite all illogical failings because the end justifies the means.
What changed?
Too many false and incompatible statements that I lost any belief that your words are intended to reflect what you actually believe.
You own that.
quote:
If this is in reference to me,I don’t pretend to be anything.
Hmmm... You sure pretended to be far more orthodox of a Catholic than you actually are.
That said you've never pretended to be a moderate as far as I can tell. You are extremely far left, I don't think having an alt would let you get further left than wannabe champagne anarchist, nor would it be "off brand"
quote:
Some people are fixated on tribalism and cannot engage in discourse unless they have shoehorned the other person in some meaningless category.
Like Bloodthirsty? Just because you see the Gospels as incompatible with the Old Testament?
For shame.
quote:
fricking alters why?
Because their accounts with 60,000 posts pretend to be moderates.
It's only when they hop on their alts do they let the face mask slip.
quote:
I said you cling to OT Scripture to justify your personal blood thirst. I stand by that statement.
That's not what you said.
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/display.aspx?sp=122873351&s=2&p=122871588#122873351
quote:
I embrace the Gospel and teachings of Jesus Christ so it’s hard for me to follow your OT justifications for your personal blood thirst.
You've been playing this game for a long time, you let the cat out this time, you see the Gospel as different than the Old Testament
https://www.catholic.com/qa/how-important-is-the-old-testament-for-catholics
quote:
Question:
How important is the Old Testament to modern Catholics? I know that Christ fulfilled the old Law and all, but should we still feel that the Old Testament is important and viable to our faith?
It's a good question.
quote:
The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value, for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.
Indeed, “the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men.” “Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional,” the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God’s saving love: these writings “are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way.”
Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism). (CCC 121-123)
And a good answer.
I'm sure you will try to claim you are being misinterpreted, and that's a matter between you and God.
But you are heretical, and this heresy affects a number of your crazy views like sending your daughter to lesbians homes.
You cannot pick and choose which parts of the Bible are sacred.
I say this out of concern, but I'm not sure that's warranted anymore.
I don't see
You just said that you don't believe the Old Testament...
What an illogical hodgepodge of belief you have.
quote:
Have mercy on us
quote:
For destroying life and God’s creation.
You just said that you don't believe the Old Testament...
What an illogical hodgepodge of belief you have.
re: Trump sounds the alarm: SCOTUS' decision might FORCE the taxpayer to pay 100's of Billion
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 2:18 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
keep dancing.
No... I haven't danced this entire time, you are just having an "episode"
You have my offer it stands.
Or you could read the previous posts.
Tell me when you want to actually discuss. :cheers:
re: Trump sounds the alarm: SCOTUS' decision might FORCE the taxpayer to pay 100's of Billion
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 2:14 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
true or false?
So you cannot define what you are talking about...
You can't even bound the question about what you are asking about.
True or false?
I mean with you it's obviously false you lied multiple times here.
Again if you define which phase of the cases you are asking about I can tell you if my statement applies or does not apply to it.
That's how two person communication works.
re: Trump sounds the alarm: SCOTUS' decision might FORCE the taxpayer to pay 100's of Billion
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 2:10 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
I'm loving all the effort you're putting into not saying if your own words are true or false. You can keep going and I'll just keep asking again.
Ooh and you said we were done here... but your autism won't let you.
So are you referring to the impending Court Case that has not yet happened where they will weigh if any refund will happen?
So you are no longer talking about the refund mechanism but about the Initial case where the government will decide if ANY Tariffs are due?
quote:
On the Supreme Court point, you’re putting words in my mouth. The discussion I've been involved in here has been about the mechanism of potential tariff refunds. That's obviously conditioned on it actually happening. Whether that happens or not does nothing to invalidate my points.
Let's see if you can actually be sensible enough to define the question.
re: Trump sounds the alarm: SCOTUS' decision might FORCE the taxpayer to pay 100's of Billion
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 2:03 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
true or false?
You are still lying.
I very clearly explained something and you refuse to acknowledge why your statement is stupid.
Why are you so dumb?
Why is your reading comprehension so bad?
Are you drunk this early in the day? Day drinking?
quote:
It’s customary for Catholics to pray for God’s mercy on the souls of the recently departed. I was mourning the deaths of the soldiers.
Lies...
quote:
Have mercy on us
I asked you for what.
quote:
For destroying life and God’s creation.
Are you taking that back?
re: Trump sounds the alarm: SCOTUS' decision might FORCE the taxpayer to pay 100's of Billion
Posted by Narax on 3/1/26 at 1:55 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Can't answer yes or no to your own quote but you'll do an entire rage novel that no one read in response to a post that had nothing to do with you because you didn't read it.
Still lying homie. You can't keep your word can you.
I told you I already explained it to you. You could have read what I already posted.
You artificially bound your questions to the topic you wanted to talk about, a topic that I was not talking about.
So answering yes or no about how my words apply to a totally different topic is nonsense.
If I say I believe that Police should carry guns, and you accuse me of saying criminals should carry guns, quote me out of context and demand a yes or no, I'll mock you like the autistic you are acting like.
I'm shocked that you still don't get it.
quote:
What else can we do when the middle aged white men aren’t capable of formulating any thoughts or ideas?
Everything you have is due to middle aged white men; their thoughts and ideas are what allows you to have a home and a maid.
Popular
16
