- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:00 pm to Riverside
quote:
Trump must do a better job vetting justices if he has the chance to make additional appointments
It seems like it's predominantly Roberts and ACB. Kavanaugh seems to be a Constitutianalist. ...for the most part. ACB is now a full blown leftist.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:04 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Is this sarcasm, or do you really not understand what you quoted?
Well, yes, it was sarcasm. The poster was accusing another of saying that cases only went to SCOTUS after going through the proper channels. Actually SFP, who I think he meant to accuse, would surely not say that SCOTUS never has ruled on something that had not yet gone through proper review by lower courts; just that that it was improper to do so. And this is exactly what Alito says in this dissent.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:04 pm to AGGIES
quote:
my primary concern is the integrity of our political institutions
They have none.
So you should act accordingly.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:05 pm to AGGIES
quote:
The largest issue is a constitutional question, not an immigration question.
You said you were worried about the politicization of our institutions.
It would seem that Sanctuary States is a larger issue than El Salvador not wanting to give us one of it's own citizens.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:07 pm to Azkiger
Specifically respect for and the Integrity of the Supreme Court.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:08 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Specifically respect for and the Integrity of the Supreme Court.
Well then you have nothing to worry about. Unless the Trump Admin refuses to accept this illegal MS13 member back, how are they not "facilitating" his return?
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:26 pm to Penrod
quote:
Actually SFP, who I think he meant to accuse, would surely not say that SCOTUS never has ruled on something that had not yet gone through proper review by lower courts; just that that it was improper to do so.
He argued yesterday that SCOTUS didn't issue an injunction on the COVID jab mandate because it didn't go through the right channels first, which is in fact completely false and a misrepresentation of what happened.
He was trying to use their eventual ruling against the COVID jab mandate as an example of SCOTUS checking liberal overreach, but the reality is the damage had already been done because they wouldn't issue an injunction when that was appropriately brought before them. Their ruling was too late to stop anything Joe Biden's admin did with that mandate.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:29 pm to Azkiger
quote:
how are they not "facilitating" his return?
To them, facilitating means that Trump is compelled to negotiate with a foreign government. In their mind, anything less than that is illegal on Trump’s part.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m right. And you’re a piece of shite. A giant piece of shite. Your ideas come straight from Satan. I don’t say that as hyperbole. You’ve given your brain to Satan and seared your conscience with a thousands sins.
This is next level melting
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:49 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Like when the Administration has already renditioned litigants out of the country and the jurisdiction of US Courts and then claimed laughable impotency to return them?
I agree that’s something extraordinary that’s never been done before.
I guess you aren’t old enough remember when we did renditions abroad and incarcerated terror suspect in Black Sites then?
Posted on 4/20/25 at 12:49 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That fact that you’re a constitutional conservative OK with renditioning “others” away before a court can rule is another problem.
That you are saying this shows how little understanding you have of the issue.
The government has, from day 1, argued that the proper judicial review is habeas. That is far from deporting "before a court can rule."
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:11 pm to TrueTiger
This SCOTUS has been a failure since Robert’s allowed Obamacare
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:29 pm to AGGIES
quote:
The Constitution isn’t imperiled by a President deporting a gang-banging wife-beater who has been here illegally for a decade.
I disagree. You are acting like there isn’t a crisis currently happening. But it is.
There is a crisis. It's the courts taking power from the president.
Its pointed out by Atilo that the SCOTUS broke its own rules at the midnight hour knowing that the 5th is about to rule. Knowing what came out in court earlier where the admin stated there were no plans to deport anybody in the class.
So yes, there is a crisis, the courts. And that is now a constitutional crisis. And there is no return from this.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:33 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Trump hasn’t facilitated his return. Hasn’t tried
Even fricking CNN head legal chick understands this. They were careful with the term because they can not dictate to other nations.
Had they meant for him to be returned the words g would have been " you are so ordered to return him".
The word 'facilitate' does not mean "go get him". What it means is if they are willing to return him, we arrange that means.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:54 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
I guess you aren’t old enough remember when we did renditions abroad and incarcerated terror suspect in Black Sites then?
Obama and Biden both droned to death innocent people and they didn’t batt an eye
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:58 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Trump hasn’t facilitated his return
Here’s the problem with this line of thinking. You think the word “facilitate” means Trump is compelled to do something in order to bring this guy back. Reasonable people understand that the word facilitate simply means that he will bring him back if El Salvador offers. It doesn’t mean Trump HAS to do something.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 1:59 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
The word 'facilitate' does not mean "go get him". What it means is if they are willing to return him, we arrange that means.
Correct
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:07 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The government has, from day 1, argued that the proper judicial review is habeas.
I don’t think I’ve seen this backed up with government statements. Can you post any?
Popular
Back to top



0






