- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Columbia |
| Location: | Cali |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 55431 |
| Registered on: | 3/14/2016 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I am up 221 per share! 165%.
re: Constitutional Scholar tell SFP and Roger and his merry orgy band how wrong they are
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/4/26 at 1:13 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
He actually said this is a stronger case than the Noriega case
In an extraordinary military operation, the United States launched a large-scale military operation in Caracas, Venezuela, early Saturday, with Special Forces seizing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. There is a pending 2020 indictment of Maduro in the Southern District of New York, where he is expected to be taken to face prosecution…
This operation will be justified as executing the criminal warrant and responding to an international drug cartel, a very similar legal framework to the one used against Noriega. There is precedent supporting that earlier operation, which will now be used to defend the actions in Venezuela…
Democratic members quickly denounced the operation as unlawful. They may want to review past cases, particularly the decision related to the Noriega prosecution after his capture by the administration of President George H.W. Bush…
Trump does not need congressional approval for this type of operation. Presidents, including Democratic presidents, have launched lethal attacks regularly against individuals. President Barack Obama killed an American citizen under this “kill list” policy. If Obama can vaporize an American citizen without even a criminal charge, Trump can capture a foreign citizen with a pending criminal indictment without prior congressional approval.
This operation will be justified as executing the criminal warrant and responding to an international drug cartel, a very similar legal framework to the one used against Noriega. There is precedent supporting that earlier operation, which will now be used to defend the actions in Venezuela…
Democratic members quickly denounced the operation as unlawful. They may want to review past cases, particularly the decision related to the Noriega prosecution after his capture by the administration of President George H.W. Bush…
Trump does not need congressional approval for this type of operation. Presidents, including Democratic presidents, have launched lethal attacks regularly against individuals. President Barack Obama killed an American citizen under this “kill list” policy. If Obama can vaporize an American citizen without even a criminal charge, Trump can capture a foreign citizen with a pending criminal indictment without prior congressional approval.
Thomas doesnt grasp the constitution. Trump did not declare war.
Mexican socialist leader big mad at Trump
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/3/26 at 1:28 pm
quote:
“Based on its foreign policy principles and its pacifist vocation, Mexico makes an urgent call to respect international law, as well as the principles and purposes of the U.N. Charter, and to cease any act of aggression against the Venezuelan government and people,” the statement said, according to an English-language translation. “Latin America and the Caribbean is a zone of peace, built on the basis of mutual respect, the peaceful settlement of disputes and the prohibition of the use and threat of force, so any military action seriously jeopardizes regional stability.”
translation " Please stop Trump. he is hurting our sales!"
Cartel of the Suns... Who is their leader??? Yep
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/3/26 at 1:17 pm
quote:
U.S. courts accused Maduro in 2020 of being a leading figure, if not the leader of, the Cartel of the Suns, an international cocaine trafficking operation led by top members of the Venezuelan regime that for years sought to “flood” the United States with cocaine to harm its people.
LINK
re: “No New Wars…”
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/3/26 at 1:00 pm to Toomer Deplorable
We are at war??? Who with?
re: Erickson nails it on removing Maduro
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/3/26 at 12:31 pm to prplhze2000
And now you know why Teump is threatening Iran.
re: Wake Forest 43 - Hail State 29 | Duke's Mayo Bowl
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 7:41 pm to theballguy
If he develops during the off season, he will be difficult to defend.
Right now, he is not seeing the open guys before they break open.
He is running too much due to it. This is his second start and his second injury.
Right now, he is not seeing the open guys before they break open.
He is running too much due to it. This is his second start and his second injury.
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 7:08 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I think you are missing the over all picture. Without stepping back into this, I will explain it differently.
The idea that is being presented by you is that in a narrow box, we will call it "the protest only box", Trump has no authority.
What others ate saying is that your box is labeled wrong and there are other details that you have to include.
An analogy... it is like saying the civil war was fought strictly to free slaves.
The point made is that Iran is sponsoring terrorists. That, and I did not know this until this thread, Iranians have been arrested here under terrorism charges. Include those into your box and you start seeing the over all picture.
If Trump saw an opportunity to back opposition that stopped the backing of terrorism, he has the authority. Him gatheringsupport for other reasons is just a plus.
I think that should clear up this debate.
The idea that is being presented by you is that in a narrow box, we will call it "the protest only box", Trump has no authority.
What others ate saying is that your box is labeled wrong and there are other details that you have to include.
An analogy... it is like saying the civil war was fought strictly to free slaves.
The point made is that Iran is sponsoring terrorists. That, and I did not know this until this thread, Iranians have been arrested here under terrorism charges. Include those into your box and you start seeing the over all picture.
If Trump saw an opportunity to back opposition that stopped the backing of terrorism, he has the authority. Him gatheringsupport for other reasons is just a plus.
I think that should clear up this debate.
Yeah. These few have never been Teump supporters. Not in 2015, 2016... etc.
They are and will always be the Rick Wilson of the pt. They believe pretty much everything he does.
They are uni party...some are leftists.
They are and will always be the Rick Wilson of the pt. They believe pretty much everything he does.
They are uni party...some are leftists.
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 12:19 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Showing your ignorance again.
Inflation is dropping. Try again Roger
Inflation is dropping. Try again Roger
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 12:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Point to the clause in the Constitution that gives the President the power to unilaterally (without Congressional approval) commit acts of war.
I can point to history all the way back to the quasi wars.
Maybe there is a difference in these terms:
- declare war
Vs
- military force used.
Maybe if you tried looking it up, you would find the history and the difference in meaning.
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 12:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Love that your TDS has you twisting. Where did Trump say he would declare war??
Thats right. He didn't. So why are you arguing a point that isnt a point at all.
This goes all the way back the 1790s. Sorry you dont like our founding and our history. Maybe you should move to a more Roger type of nation.
Maybe look into the 1964 act.
You do this with everything Roger. I mean everything. You have this idea of what America is based on what you have been fed. Yet history doesnt line up with it.
Ever consider what you were taught was simply wrong?
Just like with free trade. Remember, the nations you dont like... they set a goal to push the USA into free trade with them. Why?
Thats right. He didn't. So why are you arguing a point that isnt a point at all.
This goes all the way back the 1790s. Sorry you dont like our founding and our history. Maybe you should move to a more Roger type of nation.
Maybe look into the 1964 act.
You do this with everything Roger. I mean everything. You have this idea of what America is based on what you have been fed. Yet history doesnt line up with it.
Ever consider what you were taught was simply wrong?
Just like with free trade. Remember, the nations you dont like... they set a goal to push the USA into free trade with them. Why?
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 12:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Lol.... awe... Roger is triggered. He list one. And what do you do? "That doesnt count!!!"
Lmao
Lmao
I love that he is spouting massive leftists talking points.
Main one... evil oil companies!!!
#2 is an outright lie.
Main one... evil oil companies!!!
#2 is an outright lie.
re: Three more Venezuelan fishing boat crews sent to valhalla
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/2/26 at 10:22 am to EphesianArmor
We are to act. Its not immoral. Thats like saying a person the is breaking into your home and giving your kids fentanyl is ok and its immoral to take care of it.
Thats the stupidest thing ever
Thats the stupidest thing ever
re: Why is Massie in the Republican Party?
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/1/26 at 10:39 pm to Taxing Authority
Sir he voted to move the Biden bill to suspend the debt ceiling in 2023.
Once to the floor, he voted for it. It was signed by Biden.
Once to the floor, he voted for it. It was signed by Biden.
re: Why is Massie in the Republican Party?
Posted by Jjdoc on 1/1/26 at 10:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
No no. He 100% voted for the 2023 bill. He voted for it 2 times. Once to get it to the floor and then to pass it.
Popular

0












