JimEverett

[quote]If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached? Certainly double jeopardy is applicable to the party who would be acquitted too. Yet, it doesn't address that.[/quote] I agree. And you seem to know what you are...

Seems weird to me as well - maybe the electric car push is also turning off massive amounts of people in Michigan?...

The language in the Constitution about impeachment seems clear to me: In the case of a SITTING President, impeachment is required before a criminal prosecution can commence. That makes sense practically as well - otherwise a President could be easily hamstrung by various politically charged cases ...

[quote]Look at how America turned their back on their ally, Ukraine[/quote] Our ally, Ukraine???? Yeah, right....

I believe him. He is not running the country. Instead, the Women's Studies Department of Wellesley runs the nation....

Nothing screams "anti-establishment" quite like a silicon valley street whore....

Plays to the idea that his campaign is kooky. I like what he says about big pharma and COVID, but too much if his campaign strikes me as gimmicky or weird. ...

That reasoning might apply if the private social media company banned or restricted speech but in these cases it is the government official banning users....

Hilarious and ridiculously sad at the same time...

As the race progresses I predict Democrats supporting Sinema will slowly move to the Democrat while the Never Trumpers/GOPe stick with Sinema thereby giving the race to the Democrats...