Started By
Message

re: UT Professor fired for criticizing Charlie Kirk gets 1.9 million

Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58054 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

I disapprove of what she says, but I will defend to the death her right to say it


No you won't.

And no one stopped her from saying anything. She has freedom of speech. She does not have the freedom from consequences. If you are employed, and you say awful shite, your employer has the right to fire you for it. The government, however, can not imprison or fine you for it. That would be infringement upon free speech. Firing someone for being a grade A a-hole is not.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20727 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I hope her life ends today violently and painfully with her family watching. The world would be a better place without her in it.



If she lost her retirement 1.9mm might be enough for her to live on barring any major medical issues that arise.

After taxes she has exactly 1 major medical emergency remaining.

Getting the money and remaining on top are different skill sets.
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
8805 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:15 pm to
UTK should pay the $1.9M in her native Armenian Dram currency value - a total of about 5 grand USD



there's a special place in Hell for her anti-Christian sub-human sick mind - hopefully she arrives soon -

as for UTK - quit employee crazy people -

Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20744 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:19 pm to
Ironically the settlement is not even enough to fix everything wrong with that face.

Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11550 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Free speech ceases to exist if there are govt consequences for it
The argument being made is that government consequences encasing employment of government funded entities if that free speech would go against a code of ethics at any other place of employment, seems to be weak argument. I understand the First amendment as well as arguments and court cases used by the university's lawyers here to encourage a settlement. I just think as some other posters have voiced that there is a blanket coverage being applied where it shouldn't be applicable.

Ultimately the university cut a professor teaching a very low hanging fruit curriculum by all accounts, and after the donation clears will net 8.5MM as well as not having to pay a salary to someone that they hired to teach classes whose students I'm sure donate less to the university collectively per year than they make in beer sales during a weekend series in softball.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75411 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:55 pm to
no, no they don’t. only when it’s convenient for the Left. stop lying.
Posted by TheFenceGuy
Member since Jan 2026
110 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Tamar Shirinian


yet another Star Wars name.
Posted by toratiger
Member since Aug 2008
3626 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Bottom line, if you're not inciting violence, you should be able to say what you like without getting fired




Like a White person saying the n word?
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41660 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:00 pm to
People fail to understand that key point. I don't see how she won that money. TN is an employment at will state. If she had a contract and they fired her without pay, then I could see her winning. But if the contract had any language about her damaging the reputation of the college, then she didn't deserver a single dime.
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
18020 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

You might say it’s been a big week for the Constitution


I bet you jerked off on the regular when liberals where cancelling anyone they could find on the right.

Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63730 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:06 pm to
The university saved money in the long term with that deal.
Posted by R11
Member since Aug 2017
5563 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:38 pm to
I agree
You can’t just protect the speech you like and go along with

That’s sort of the entire purpose
Posted by dovehunter
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
1987 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:41 pm to
TN did win by getting rid of her but paying a $95K a year “professor” $2M is malfeasance. Reassign her to the janitorial section and have her clean bathrooms or something. These colleges don’t spent the money like it belongs to them. It’s free money to them and they take the easy way out by raising tuition and begging donors. They’ll just raise football tickets $20.

I bet Tony Vitello would have liked an extra $2M budget to buy players. Of course he’s gone now but just saying.
Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
21576 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Byron Bojangles III


I hope you get deported.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129273 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:42 pm to
The same people championing her free speech will be lecturing us on the consequences of free speech the next time a conservative says something offensive.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4945 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

A jury never decided whether the University did anything wrong.

It was the Universities decision to give this women1.9 million dollars after firing her. As shitty as this woman is, her First Amendment rights were violated. The amount of mental gymnastics that some of you will do to prove a point is incredible.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52277 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

I hope her life ends today violently and painfully
Dude!
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63730 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

$95K a year “professor” $2M is malfeasance.


$95K a year was just her salary, not her entire salary expense. I bet her total compensation package was upwards of $150K w/the state's share retirement and health insurance, etc., contributions.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 10:01 pm
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11136 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

That other guy who went to jail for a month got nearly a mil. What’d you think was going to happen when you blatantly violated their 1st amendment rights?


You clearly don’t understand the law or how jury trials work. A settlement is not a trial or an admission of wrongdoing.

None of these cases you have cited actually proceeded to trial. A jury would have to decide whether there was a constitutional violation and whether the person deserved money.
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
1072 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 5:19 pm to
The real RFK is turning in his grave b/c you are using his initials.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram