- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UN mad Trump won't give money to make more Muslim babies
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:20 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:20 am
Why is it the same places that won't grow their own food.
https://www.politico.eu/article/un-food-and-agriculture-farming-seeds-donald-trump-fao/
But wait it's worse!
https://www.politico.eu/article/un-food-and-agriculture-farming-seeds-donald-trump-fao/
quote:
ROME — Aid projects in crisis-hit countries from Afghanistan to the Horn of Africa have been suspended and staffing cut after President Donald Trump froze hundreds of millions in annual U.S. funding to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization
quote:
If that money disappears overnight, there’s not a single aid group that won’t feel it. In places like Afghanistan and Sudan, there’s simply no one else delivering aid at this scale. That means millions could fall back into crisis-level hunger.”
But wait it's worse!
quote:
Western diplomats fault Qu for running the FAO in a way that mirrors Beijing’s centralized style of governance, reinforcing China’s influence in global food policy.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:23 am to Narax
quote:
there’s simply no one else delivering aid at this scale.
Why?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:34 am to Narax
This is not the fault of the US taxpayers and they should not have to shoulder the burden
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:36 am to Narax
If feel worse about this if half the world didn't hate us as much as they do.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:44 am to Narax
Wow, story sounds familiar. Here we provide them a check and they don't work and overseas we provide a check and they don't work. Sorta sounds like we need to stop providing checks.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:44 am to LRB1967
quote:
This is not the fault of the US taxpayers
Actually it is. People in these places would probably have resolved their conflicts that keep them constantly at war with each other instead of growing food and prospering. The US aid gives them a false lifestyle that can be had without facing their societal problems. In short, we addict them to our aid.
Cut off the aid. There will be a period of suffering, but that path is the only one that will eventually lead them to normalcy - or not. Maybe it will lead them to extinction as has been the case with other primitive peoples. That’s okay too.
The sign in the national parks is instructive. It says something like -
“Don’t feed the animals. They will become used to it and lose their ability to feed themselves.”
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 6:47 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:45 am to Narax
The world is addicted to American money.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:53 am to Penrod
quote:I understand what you're saying and agree for the most part. But it's not like there was a nationwide referendum on any of this shite and people supported it. I think it's fair to say that most taxpayers oppose the vast majority of bullshite foreign aid and are unaware of how it's being spent. So it's not the taxpayer to blame for this, it's the a-hole politicians and associated bureaucrats that have been giving away trillions of mostly unaccountable dollars for the past fifty years that have simultaneously fricked the taxpayer and the people receiving the 'aid'.
The US aid gives them a false lifestyle that can be had without facing their societal problems. In short, we addict them to our aid.
I think Americans by and large are generous and compassionate people and most would actually support a lot of foreign aid, under the right circumstances, namely that we actually have surplus funds to give as aid. Instead, everyone's got their hand out when we're running two trillion deficits. That is not sustainable and nobody with a brain supports that.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:53 am to Penrod
quote:
Cut off the aid. There will be a period of suffering, but that path is the only one that will eventually lead them to normalcy - or not. Maybe it will lead them to extinction as has been the case with other primitive peoples. That’s okay too.
There are some theories that food abundance leads to wars in human societies.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:54 am to Penrod
Penrod, You are so very right my friend. Throughout the Caribbean and South Central America I see this play out over and over.
As an example, the US, through one of its agencies was supposed to build a water plant. The govt had the money, but they had stolen it. So the US moves in and lets the same govt oversee the project.....and the project money is stolen as well. A few years pass, another "US rep" decides to donate the money......and stolen again.
So the money for the plant has been stolen three times and the people still dont have water.
Had the US stayed out of it, and many other projects, the govts wouldnt have the stolen money for breads and circuses and the people would oust them.
As an example, the US, through one of its agencies was supposed to build a water plant. The govt had the money, but they had stolen it. So the US moves in and lets the same govt oversee the project.....and the project money is stolen as well. A few years pass, another "US rep" decides to donate the money......and stolen again.
So the money for the plant has been stolen three times and the people still dont have water.
Had the US stayed out of it, and many other projects, the govts wouldnt have the stolen money for breads and circuses and the people would oust them.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:56 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Had the US stayed out of it, and many other projects, the govts wouldnt have the stolen money for breads and circuses and the people would oust them.
100%
The US government protects corrupt politicians to promote stability at the expense of the people.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 6:56 am to Narax
quote:
If that money disappears overnight, there’s not a single aid group that won’t feel it. In places like Afghanistan and Sudan, there’s simply no one else delivering aid at this scale. That means millions could fall back into crisis-level hunger.”

Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:00 am to Narax
quote:
There are some theories that food abundance leads to wars in human societies.
It certainly used to before the advent of nations. Back then when the crops were harvested, and were bountiful, enterprising young men would gather warriors and set out for fun and adventure (and women, to be honest). These days they start businesses.
Maybe in places like Somalia it’s still like it used to be and our food aid is allowing them the luxury of time to go around raping and pillaging.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:02 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Penrod, You are so very right my friend
Not something I’m used to reading on the Rant (or hearing from my wife).
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:04 am to Penrod
quote:
Actually it is. People in these places would probably have resolved their conflicts that keep them constantly at war with each other instead of growing food and prospering. The US aid gives them a false lifestyle that can be had without facing their societal problems. In short, we addict them to our aid.
Then why are people bitching about tax cuts? Time to shut the atm down.
I agree with you btw, but I’m just tired of the crying wondering how we would pay for all this. You don’t.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 7:06 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:05 am to Narax
Sounds like that could help out the overpopulation that the UN and Bill Gates are always sky screaming about
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:05 am to Narax
quote:
there’s simply no one else delivering aid at this scale
This tells me it isn't necessary.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:11 am to Narax
What do you get when you feed 100 starving 3rd worlders? 1000 starving 3rd worlders.
That's all it accomplishes. It just makes it worse.
That's all it accomplishes. It just makes it worse.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:24 am to Narax
quote:
The cuts are expected to deepen food insecurity
Is food insecurity a new term? I've never heard it used until the last few years.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:33 am to Narax
Trump should pick one of those "sponsor a poor" websites and market it for anyone that wants to donate to fill this void. Put your money where your mouth is libs.
Popular
Back to top

15








