- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ukraine launches a Trojan Horse drone strike 3,000 miles inside Russia. Multiple Nuclear…
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Bad, bad, bad assumption. Literally the entire Russian body politick is united on the Ukraine situation .... and it has been for two decades
This is absolutely correct. Matter of fact, they think Putin is being too soft on Ukraine. If something happens to Putin in this environment you can bet the next guy will be more of a hardliner
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
Why would our relations with either become so deteriorated to the point where that’s a possibility? Why does nearly every country that borders Russia hate them and want to join NATO for defense against Russia? Dozens and dozens of countries picking on poor widdle Russia.
None of that matters. Answer the question.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Russia made this crystal clear in both the prelude to and the aftermath of the 2008 NATO Bucharest Summit. There was no mention of Finland, or Estonia, or Latvia, or Mars. The two red-line countries were Georgia and Ukraine. THAT IS WHY Russia didn't invade Finland when they said they wanted to join NATO.
Yawn. They assumed Ukraine would roll over and die. They know Finland wouldn’t.
You invaded pre-NATO Finland and the other Nordic nations would join in on the side of Finland. Other European nations would probably join in as well. Putin did not expect Ukraine to hold out this long.
This wasn’t supposed to last this long. It was a special military operation, not a war. It has become a war that Russia did not want.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:10 pm to AncientTiger
quote:lol , no
Russia expected to make a Strategic Nuclear response within hours.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:11 pm to ReeseBobby
quote:NO shite!
You forgot the area north of Lake Ladoga Karelia is much bigger than the isthmus.
Hence the term ""isthmus"".
The area between Lake Vygozero and the White Sea is similarly impeded.
You really have no clue as to WTF you're talking about./
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:14 pm to John Barron
quote:
This is absolutely correct. Matter of fact, they think Putin is being too soft on Ukraine. If something happens to Putin in this environment you can bet the next guy will be more of a hardliner
Oh, yes John Barron. You are so correct about Russia. Tell me, you are part of the Trump administration aren't you?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:15 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
the VP* of the United States making a trip over there saying Ukraine needs to be in NATO is how this kicked off.
She did not say anything about Ukraine joining NATO at the Munich Conference. She pledged econ sanctions and defense of NATO soil. Pay attention...
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:19 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
None of that matters. Answer the question.
Lmao, of course it matters. Context is king.
If we became openly hostile to our neighbors to the point where they felt it prudent to ally with an adversarial nation to protect themselves from aggression from us, they would be well within their rights to do so.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:20 pm to Old Money
quote:Indeed.
Yawn. They assumed Ukraine would roll over and die.
quote:Indeed.
They know Finland wouldn’t.
Of course it's totally irrelevant to the Ukrainian situation though.
As with European invasions through Ukraine, history provides lessons regarding Russo-Finnish wars.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:21 pm to uziyourillusion
I would expect a ww2 Dresden style bombing of Kiev tonight. Nonnuclear, western style format.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:22 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
I would expect a ww2 Dresden style bombing of Kiev tonight. Nonnuclear, western style format.
But short a few bombers right?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:25 pm to John Barron
New reports out, John proven full of shite again. Gets owned in another thread and tries to pivot to some small technicality, again.
If it wasn't so sad, it’d be funny.
If it wasn't so sad, it’d be funny.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:28 pm to ReeseBobby
quote:
My point has always been that if NATO expansion was really a reason for Russias invasion of Ukraine than they lost when Sweden and Finland joined.
Your point is not a good point. Russia has a naval base in Sevastopol that they will fight to keep. That's been the case for centuries. Eastern Ukraine has a lot of ethnic Russians who don't want to join NATO, which is why Ukraine was fighting a civil war since 2014.
Russia was willing to let Sweden and Finland join the EU and multiple other eastern European countries, but they're not willing to cede Eastern Ukraine and Crimea because they see that as more important and don't want it in NATO hands. It's worth more to them than it is to the US, which is why we should get out of this conflict before it turns into something nobody wants.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:29 pm to MisslePig
quote:
If it wasn't so sad, it’d be funny.
Like I've said, he is addicted to the PoliBoard and large quantities of coffee so he can stay up and shat on the Board day and night and then day and night.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:35 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
So given that Putin and Zelensky have painted themselves into a corner, what is the most optimistic outcome re a truly POSSIBLE scenario? As retaliation and escalation is a Russian given, and that such will likely have far reaching consequences for us, what is the best we can hope for? What will the EU do? What will Trump do?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:43 pm to wdhalgren
You don’t make any sense. Russia has held Sevastopol since 2014. The invasion in 2022 had nothing to do with Sevastopol.
Russia has 800 miles of NATO adjacent to its 2nd most important city and only Baltic port.
My point stands. If this was truly about NATO expansion than Russia already lost
Russia has 800 miles of NATO adjacent to its 2nd most important city and only Baltic port.
My point stands. If this was truly about NATO expansion than Russia already lost
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:51 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
So given that Putin and Zelensky have painted themselves into a corner, what is the most optimistic outcome re a truly POSSIBLE scenario? As retaliation and escalation is a Russian given, and that such will likely have far reaching consequences for us, what is the best we can hope for? What will the EU do? What will Trump do?
I don't know the answers, but I'm not optimistic. Europe and NATO don't care about Ukraine. This is and always has been a proxy war; the question is why. NATO knew Russia wasn't going to give up Ukraine without a fight, particularly the east. The only realistic motive I see is energy; the EU is deficient and Russia is loaded. One has been expansionist for the last 30 years, and the other one hasn't. If defeating Russia is the end game here, this will get ugly for all concerned.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:54 pm to ReeseBobby
quote:
You don’t make any sense. Russia has held Sevastopol since 2014. The invasion in 2022 had nothing to do with Sevastopol.
Russia has 800 miles of NATO adjacent to its 2nd most important city and only Baltic port.
My point stands. If this was truly about NATO expansion than Russia already lost
You don't make any sense. After Ukraine joined NATO, do you really think NATO intended to let Russia maintain control of Sevastopol? Answer is no; NATO was formed as defense against Russia, they won't allow a Russian naval base inside the borders of a NATO country. And once Ukraine joined NATO, Russia knew that they'd have to fight NATO to get it back, so they attacked Ukraine before they joined. They didn't attack Sweden or Finland. They attacked Ukraine because that's what they care about.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I get that, but destroying 40+ active bombers would be a massive escalation of the war.
“Escalation”?
These bombers have been used to drop bombs on Ukrainian cities throughout this war. The best way to stop bombers from bombing your people is to blow up the bombers. That isn’t “escalation,” it’s what you have to do to protect your people.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:38 pm to TBoy
quote:
“Escalation”?
Yes. I didnt say I blamed them.
Popular
Back to top


2






