Started By
Message

re: Ukraine launches a Trojan Horse drone strike 3,000 miles inside Russia. Multiple Nuclear…

Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Bad, bad, bad assumption. Literally the entire Russian body politick is united on the Ukraine situation .... and it has been for two decades


This is absolutely correct. Matter of fact, they think Putin is being too soft on Ukraine. If something happens to Putin in this environment you can bet the next guy will be more of a hardliner
Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
9785 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Why would our relations with either become so deteriorated to the point where that’s a possibility? Why does nearly every country that borders Russia hate them and want to join NATO for defense against Russia? Dozens and dozens of countries picking on poor widdle Russia.


None of that matters. Answer the question.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41779 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Russia made this crystal clear in both the prelude to and the aftermath of the 2008 NATO Bucharest Summit. There was no mention of Finland, or Estonia, or Latvia, or Mars. The two red-line countries were Georgia and Ukraine. THAT IS WHY Russia didn't invade Finland when they said they wanted to join NATO.


Yawn. They assumed Ukraine would roll over and die. They know Finland wouldn’t.

You invaded pre-NATO Finland and the other Nordic nations would join in on the side of Finland. Other European nations would probably join in as well. Putin did not expect Ukraine to hold out this long.

This wasn’t supposed to last this long. It was a special military operation, not a war. It has become a war that Russia did not want.

Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
9172 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

Russia expected to make a Strategic Nuclear response within hours.
lol , no
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138899 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

You forgot the area north of Lake Ladoga Karelia is much bigger than the isthmus.
NO shite!
Hence the term ""isthmus"".

The area between Lake Vygozero and the White Sea is similarly impeded.
You really have no clue as to WTF you're talking about./


This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:12 pm
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24007 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

This is absolutely correct. Matter of fact, they think Putin is being too soft on Ukraine. If something happens to Putin in this environment you can bet the next guy will be more of a hardliner


Oh, yes John Barron. You are so correct about Russia. Tell me, you are part of the Trump administration aren't you?
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4971 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

the VP* of the United States making a trip over there saying Ukraine needs to be in NATO is how this kicked off.


She did not say anything about Ukraine joining NATO at the Munich Conference. She pledged econ sanctions and defense of NATO soil. Pay attention...
Posted by uziyourillusion
Member since Dec 2024
654 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

None of that matters. Answer the question.


Lmao, of course it matters. Context is king.

If we became openly hostile to our neighbors to the point where they felt it prudent to ally with an adversarial nation to protect themselves from aggression from us, they would be well within their rights to do so.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:21 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138899 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Yawn. They assumed Ukraine would roll over and die.
Indeed.

quote:

They know Finland wouldn’t.
Indeed.
Of course it's totally irrelevant to the Ukrainian situation though.
As with European invasions through Ukraine, history provides lessons regarding Russo-Finnish wars.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11011 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:21 pm to
I would expect a ww2 Dresden style bombing of Kiev tonight. Nonnuclear, western style format.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24007 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

I would expect a ww2 Dresden style bombing of Kiev tonight. Nonnuclear, western style format.


But short a few bombers right?
Posted by MisslePig
Member since Jul 2018
1174 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:25 pm to
New reports out, John proven full of shite again. Gets owned in another thread and tries to pivot to some small technicality, again.

If it wasn't so sad, it’d be funny.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5300 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

My point has always been that if NATO expansion was really a reason for Russias invasion of Ukraine than they lost when Sweden and Finland joined.


Your point is not a good point. Russia has a naval base in Sevastopol that they will fight to keep. That's been the case for centuries. Eastern Ukraine has a lot of ethnic Russians who don't want to join NATO, which is why Ukraine was fighting a civil war since 2014.

Russia was willing to let Sweden and Finland join the EU and multiple other eastern European countries, but they're not willing to cede Eastern Ukraine and Crimea because they see that as more important and don't want it in NATO hands. It's worth more to them than it is to the US, which is why we should get out of this conflict before it turns into something nobody wants.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24007 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

If it wasn't so sad, it’d be funny.


Like I've said, he is addicted to the PoliBoard and large quantities of coffee so he can stay up and shat on the Board day and night and then day and night.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39683 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:35 pm to
So given that Putin and Zelensky have painted themselves into a corner, what is the most optimistic outcome re a truly POSSIBLE scenario? As retaliation and escalation is a Russian given, and that such will likely have far reaching consequences for us, what is the best we can hope for? What will the EU do? What will Trump do?
Posted by ReeseBobby
Comanche TX
Member since Oct 2021
312 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:43 pm to
You don’t make any sense. Russia has held Sevastopol since 2014. The invasion in 2022 had nothing to do with Sevastopol.

Russia has 800 miles of NATO adjacent to its 2nd most important city and only Baltic port.

My point stands. If this was truly about NATO expansion than Russia already lost
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5300 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

So given that Putin and Zelensky have painted themselves into a corner, what is the most optimistic outcome re a truly POSSIBLE scenario? As retaliation and escalation is a Russian given, and that such will likely have far reaching consequences for us, what is the best we can hope for? What will the EU do? What will Trump do?


I don't know the answers, but I'm not optimistic. Europe and NATO don't care about Ukraine. This is and always has been a proxy war; the question is why. NATO knew Russia wasn't going to give up Ukraine without a fight, particularly the east. The only realistic motive I see is energy; the EU is deficient and Russia is loaded. One has been expansionist for the last 30 years, and the other one hasn't. If defeating Russia is the end game here, this will get ugly for all concerned.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5300 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

You don’t make any sense. Russia has held Sevastopol since 2014. The invasion in 2022 had nothing to do with Sevastopol.

Russia has 800 miles of NATO adjacent to its 2nd most important city and only Baltic port.

My point stands. If this was truly about NATO expansion than Russia already lost


You don't make any sense. After Ukraine joined NATO, do you really think NATO intended to let Russia maintain control of Sevastopol? Answer is no; NATO was formed as defense against Russia, they won't allow a Russian naval base inside the borders of a NATO country. And once Ukraine joined NATO, Russia knew that they'd have to fight NATO to get it back, so they attacked Ukraine before they joined. They didn't attack Sweden or Finland. They attacked Ukraine because that's what they care about.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 7:58 pm
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28576 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

I get that, but destroying 40+ active bombers would be a massive escalation of the war.

“Escalation”?

These bombers have been used to drop bombs on Ukrainian cities throughout this war. The best way to stop bombers from bombing your people is to blow up the bombers. That isn’t “escalation,” it’s what you have to do to protect your people.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299628 posts
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:38 pm to
quote:


“Escalation”?


Yes. I didnt say I blamed them.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram