Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

UK claims that their high rate of rapes is due to their broad classification

Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:01 am
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85055 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:01 am
But turns out, the US has a broader classification of rape

I asked Grok what the US rape rate would be using the UK's classification of rape, our rate fell 8%

LINK

quote:

UK (England and Wales) rape definition (Sexual Offences Act 2003): Intentional penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth with a penis, without consent (or reasonable belief in consent). This is narrow — it requires a male perpetrator using his penis. Non-penile penetration (e.g., fingers or objects into vagina/anus) is classified separately as assault by penetration, not rape. Oral/anal penile acts count as rape.


quote:

US FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) revised definition (since 2013, used for current stats): Penetration (however slight) of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without consent. This is broader and gender-neutral. It includes the UK-style penile acts plus non-penile ones.



quote:

2024 US reported rape rate (broad/revised definition): 37.5 per 100,000 inhabitants.

Adjusted for UK classification (˜92% penile): ˜34.5 per 100,000.



Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44971 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:03 am to
Invaders are raping English children and their government defends the invaders.

England is dead.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
39237 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:24 am to
No, the English are evil.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
24101 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:25 am to
They’re saying that unwanted finger diddling is ok.

Send their daughters into that and see if it’s still ok.
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 8:27 am
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70833 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:37 am to
Can we see what the U.S. rate would be using the UK definition?

Are the UK rape stats still underreported from intentional suppression by Labour party leaders to deny the existence of Muslim grooming gangs?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117841 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:42 am to
quote:

it requires a male perpetrator using his penis.

What if it's a Trans? And there have been rapes committed against women and the perp identified as a female.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28698 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Send their daughters into that and see if it’s still ok.



Apparently they've been doing just that and the majority sure seems cool with it.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
24863 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:49 am to
Only commoners daughters, the political elite all live behind gated fences with none of these drs and lawyers near them.

It’s like the Dems on Martha’s Vineyard, very happy with illegals here until they are shipped to their island and then in less than a hour they have cops removing them.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70833 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Apparently they've been doing just that and the majority sure seems cool with it.


They arrest anyone who complains
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3286 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:01 am to
According to Mayor Johnson in Chicago, even thinking that way is transfemicide lol (well kinda lol I guess, it's really stupid but not really funny).

Regarding the article, it would seem that requiring penile penetration would have the effect of minimizing, not maximizing, their rape stats. If you're going to call using your fingers or an object sexual assault (battery, really) rather than rape, the rape numbers look slightly better because several acts we consider rape here (especially statutory rape) do not require penetration - merely feeling up a minor will, rightfully, get the adult aggressor charged with statutory rape (laws vary by state of course).

The UK has a rape problem because they let in all those immigrants from rapey cultures to prey on their children and other citizens and anything they say now are just hollow excuses.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52306 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:13 am to
Reminding you that then Prince Charles, married to the lovely Princess Diana, was carrying on an affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, now 'Queen' Camilla, and in an intercepted conversation wished himself to be "the tampon in her knickers." Brits are fricked up people. Especially the royals.

Time - Tampongate

Married to this:



But doing the nasty with this:



Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66166 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:23 am to
They're gearing up to cook the stats by changing the way they're recorded. The British government loves doing shite like this. When they passed their big gun ban in the 90's, the gun murder rate actually went up. Therefore, they started only counting homicides if there was a criminal conviction involved. All unsolved gun deaths were not counted, which led to the stats falsely indicating that the gun murder rate went down.

Bogus gun control successes: U.K. edition

It's similar to how Obama changed the definition of mass shooting so he coud make it look like there was an explosion of mass shootings.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
123852 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:25 am to
At least they have Uber Eats and fresh veggies
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
39237 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:36 am to
"King" Charles is a trans.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
4488 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:40 am to
What country was it where the progressives in charge let the foot soldier go because the rape didn't last long enough?
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6762 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:55 am to
In true fashion maybe they should just blame the penis and outlaw vaginas?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140142 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:55 am to
quote:

due to their broad classification
They classify their broads as cray-cray?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36564 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

UK claims that their high rate of rapes is due to their broad classification


Well, it worked for autism stats so, why not?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27096 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:00 am to
Like France, the rate of rape corresponds to the increase in Muslims and Africans. It's not a small difference.

Grok:
quote:

Around 314 recorded rape offences in England and Wales in 1950 (the primary jurisdiction for such UK-wide historical statistics; data for Scotland and Northern Ireland were tracked separately).

researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk

This figure comes from official Home Office Criminal Statistics for England and Wales (the standard source for long-term comparisons). Rape here referred to non-consensual vaginal penetration by a man of a woman (narrower than modern definitions, which later expanded to include other acts and male victims).




quote:

Around 71,000–72,000 police-recorded rape offences in England and Wales for periods covering most of 2024
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 11:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram