- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on the Movie, Oppenheimer
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:33 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:33 pm to joshnorris14
Source for that claim? The Japanese were not surrendering.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:35 pm to joshnorris14
quote:He had to give up his divine status as a God to Japan as part of the terms of peace. That was out of the question until the bomb was dropped.
Do you know when Hirohito stepped down as Emperor? When he died in 1989.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:37 pm to HubbaBubba
The Japaneses surrendered because Tokyo was next with a bomb that made the previous two look like a firecracker.
Personally, I am really glad they surrendered. The third bomb would have been awful.
Personally, I am really glad they surrendered. The third bomb would have been awful.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:38 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
Don't you kinda refute this with this...
quote:
But there would be no occupation of Japanese soil, thus assuring continuance of the imperial system and Hirohito’s seat on the throne. In view of Germany’s renewed war after the Treaty of Versailles, there is zero chance US leaders would have accepted that framework to end the war.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:40 pm to Jake88
quote:
Don't you kinda refute this with this...
I'm not sure how I refute that, considering I didn't write it. I think it's contradictory, considering the US did accept the Imperial System and Hirohito's continued rule.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:42 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
He had to give up his divine status as a God to Japan as part of the terms of peace. That was out of the question until the bomb was dropped.
That is a far cry from an unconditional surrender, though.
Why was anything short of unconditional surrender off the table in June, but, after demonstrating thoroughly destructive capabilities, the US accepted conditional surrender?
Was the US in a weaker position relative to the Japanese in August of 1945 vs in June of 1945? Why would their negotiating position diminish given their clear superiority?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:43 pm to Wednesday
Just saw it and fully agree. It's no documentary, nor is it the feel-good movie of the year. It's pretty heavy and honest, in many uncomfortable ways. It could have been far more graphic too.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:45 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway.
I’m not going to insult your intelligence because you may very well know a lot about this subject, but I would definitely recommend you check out some more contemporary examples of this topic.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:48 pm to joshnorris14
The journos who reported it and the historians that claimed it back in the day are…suspect.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:52 pm to joshnorris14
From History.com
Hirohito was a figurehead after WW2 like the monarchy in the UK with elected representative government. Far cry from US accepting a continued imperial system.
quote:
A postwar constitution preserved the monarchy but defined the emperor as a mere symbol of the state. All political power went to elected representatives. Unlike many among his top military brass, Hirohito was not indicted as a war criminal, in part because U.S. authorities feared it could throw their occupation into chaos. From 1945 to 1951, Hirohito toured the country and oversaw reconstruction efforts. The American occupation ended in 1952, after which Hirohito served largely in the background while Japan went through a period of rapid economic growth. He died on January 7, 1989, having spent nearly 64 years on the throne—the longest imperial reign in Japanese history. To this day, Hirohito’s wartime record remains a subject of much debate.
Hirohito was a figurehead after WW2 like the monarchy in the UK with elected representative government. Far cry from US accepting a continued imperial system.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:54 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:54 pm to Wednesday
quote:
1- First and foremost. Go to see it. In fact, it's so good I may go to see it again
No. MSM has told me because a non Jew is playing the lead, this movie should be boycotted
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:55 pm to Dixie Normus
quote:
Link is from US Dept of Energy.
Is this the same US that knew the Japs were on their way to attack Pearl Harbor?
Why would we believe anything they say?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:58 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The bomb was the only reason Japan surrendered
I have no qualms, doubts, or opposition about the necessity of dropping the bombs on Japan, but time has borne out that the USSR’s invasion of Manchuria also played a massive role in Japan’s capitulation (and our decision to drop the bombs). It was in both the Japanese and the American interest to end the war as quickly as possible once the USSR entered the pacific theater.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:00 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
Interesting. What was the difference in terms?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:01 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
In June, the US was demanding unconditional surrender, but in August, after the bombs were dropped, the US accepted a conditional surrender.
In August the Soviets were eyeing an invasion of Hokkaido….
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:03 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Why would their negotiating position diminish given their clear superiority?
Moscow.
We wanted peace with Japan on our terms. Not on Moscows terms, and without giving Moscow any sort of concession like what occurred at Potsdam.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:23 pm to sta4ever
quote:
I don’t understand why people even GAF about what the left says about dropping the bombs on Japan.
Agree totally.
It was probably meant to be a message to both Japan and the Soviets that you best not frick with us.
It’s worked pretty well for the last 75 years or so
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:24 pm to Wednesday
quote:That racist fiction writer NikoleHanna Jones has been pushing this silly narrative for quite a while. As usual with her, with zero sourcing or proof.
2- Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:26 pm to sta4ever
quote:The Left seems angry we won. It’s incredibly offensive.
I don’t understand why people even GAF about what the left says about dropping the bombs on Japan.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:27 pm
Popular
Back to top


0









