Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on the Movie, Oppenheimer

Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:33 pm to
Posted by FriscoTiger1973
Frisco, Texas
Member since Jan 2012
1414 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:33 pm to
Source for that claim? The Japanese were not surrendering.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51757 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Do you know when Hirohito stepped down as Emperor? When he died in 1989.
He had to give up his divine status as a God to Japan as part of the terms of peace. That was out of the question until the bomb was dropped.
Posted by jimlsu1
Ellicott City, Md
Member since Oct 2008
1625 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:37 pm to
The Japaneses surrendered because Tokyo was next with a bomb that made the previous two look like a firecracker.
Personally, I am really glad they surrendered. The third bomb would have been awful.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79905 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.


Don't you kinda refute this with this...
quote:

But there would be no occupation of Japanese soil, thus assuring continuance of the imperial system and Hirohito’s seat on the throne. In view of Germany’s renewed war after the Treaty of Versailles, there is zero chance US leaders would have accepted that framework to end the war.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46952 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Don't you kinda refute this with this...


I'm not sure how I refute that, considering I didn't write it. I think it's contradictory, considering the US did accept the Imperial System and Hirohito's continued rule.

Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46952 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

He had to give up his divine status as a God to Japan as part of the terms of peace. That was out of the question until the bomb was dropped.


That is a far cry from an unconditional surrender, though.

Why was anything short of unconditional surrender off the table in June, but, after demonstrating thoroughly destructive capabilities, the US accepted conditional surrender?

Was the US in a weaker position relative to the Japanese in August of 1945 vs in June of 1945? Why would their negotiating position diminish given their clear superiority?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47017 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:43 pm to

Just saw it and fully agree. It's no documentary, nor is it the feel-good movie of the year. It's pretty heavy and honest, in many uncomfortable ways. It could have been far more graphic too.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38906 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway.


I’m not going to insult your intelligence because you may very well know a lot about this subject, but I would definitely recommend you check out some more contemporary examples of this topic.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130170 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:48 pm to
The journos who reported it and the historians that claimed it back in the day are…suspect.
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2870 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:52 pm to
From History.com

quote:

A postwar constitution preserved the monarchy but defined the emperor as a mere symbol of the state. All political power went to elected representatives. Unlike many among his top military brass, Hirohito was not indicted as a war criminal, in part because U.S. authorities feared it could throw their occupation into chaos. From 1945 to 1951, Hirohito toured the country and oversaw reconstruction efforts. The American occupation ended in 1952, after which Hirohito served largely in the background while Japan went through a period of rapid economic growth. He died on January 7, 1989, having spent nearly 64 years on the throne—the longest imperial reign in Japanese history. To this day, Hirohito’s wartime record remains a subject of much debate.


Hirohito was a figurehead after WW2 like the monarchy in the UK with elected representative government. Far cry from US accepting a continued imperial system.
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
5911 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.

For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

1- First and foremost. Go to see it. In fact, it's so good I may go to see it again


No. MSM has told me because a non Jew is playing the lead, this movie should be boycotted
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
22859 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Link is from US Dept of Energy.


Is this the same US that knew the Japs were on their way to attack Pearl Harbor?

Why would we believe anything they say?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37202 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

The bomb was the only reason Japan surrendered

I have no qualms, doubts, or opposition about the necessity of dropping the bombs on Japan, but time has borne out that the USSR’s invasion of Manchuria also played a massive role in Japan’s capitulation (and our decision to drop the bombs). It was in both the Japanese and the American interest to end the war as quickly as possible once the USSR entered the pacific theater.

This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:02 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28014 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.


Interesting. What was the difference in terms?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37202 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

In June, the US was demanding unconditional surrender, but in August, after the bombs were dropped, the US accepted a conditional surrender.

In August the Soviets were eyeing an invasion of Hokkaido….
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37202 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Why would their negotiating position diminish given their clear superiority?

Moscow.

We wanted peace with Japan on our terms. Not on Moscows terms, and without giving Moscow any sort of concession like what occurred at Potsdam.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17276 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand why people even GAF about what the left says about dropping the bombs on Japan.


Agree totally.

It was probably meant to be a message to both Japan and the Soviets that you best not frick with us.

It’s worked pretty well for the last 75 years or so
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63276 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

2- Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway.
That racist fiction writer NikoleHanna Jones has been pushing this silly narrative for quite a while. As usual with her, with zero sourcing or proof.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:25 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63276 posts
Posted on 7/24/23 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand why people even GAF about what the left says about dropping the bombs on Japan.
The Left seems angry we won. It’s incredibly offensive.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 7:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram