- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Thoughts on the Movie, Oppenheimer
Posted on 7/24/23 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 5:54 pm
1- First and foremost. Go to see it. In fact, it's so good I may go to see it again.
2- Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway. The bomb was the only reason Japan surrendered and WWII ended. The only insinuation the movie makes about this surrender point was that the Deep State put out a narrative that Oppenheimer insisted we drop it out of hubris.
3- The point of the movie is WTF hath we wrought by building this bomb. Ultimately, the arch of the story is that the Deep State persecuted Oppenheimer bc he was politically vocal that we shouldn't build the H-Bomb bc it was way more dangerous. There are so many things that science and its progress could lead to that are a pandora's box (ex AI), that ethics in science are a MUST. And that issue is fascinating.
4- It is ironic that the leftwinger morons are arguing point 2, since the movie essentially can be interpretted as turning Oppenheimer into some left wing martyr of McCarthyism. Despite this, it has many and deeper points about the Deep State and its origins, along with the dangers of hubris with scientists and combining it with government which can be traced directly to the Manhattan Project.
5 - I have no idea whether Oppenheimer was a communist or just hung out with them bc academia is infested with them anyway. I don't buy any Hollywood interpretation that he was not a commie, bc again, Hollywood is infested with morons who think that being a communist is the epitome of virtue. The movie takes great pains to show that Oppenheimer was not a communist, even though he knew some communists. That said, I do believe he was loyal to his country and did not share any nuclear secrets with the USSR (as concluded by the Deep State itself at some point). There were other actual communists on the Manhattan Project approved by the goverment despite their communism - and so frick the MIC. We should have never given them security clearances, or let them be on the Manhattan Project.
6 - The origin of the Deep State was what they did to Oppenheimer.
7 - The movie is a study in the dangers of making scientists part of the government bc ultimately these scientists have to become politicians to survive. In light of recent events (cough Fauci and DOD research related to bioweapons), this is particularly compelling.
8- I should have never gone to see this movie bc I'm currently reading Dr. Mary's Monkey.
9- The Deep State will flat out wreck the life of any scientist who they find to be no longer useful, with zero consequences.
10- The Deep State needs to be obliterrated. Torn out Root and Branch.
ETA - Edited to fix numbering. But otherwise, please discuss.
2- Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway. The bomb was the only reason Japan surrendered and WWII ended. The only insinuation the movie makes about this surrender point was that the Deep State put out a narrative that Oppenheimer insisted we drop it out of hubris.
3- The point of the movie is WTF hath we wrought by building this bomb. Ultimately, the arch of the story is that the Deep State persecuted Oppenheimer bc he was politically vocal that we shouldn't build the H-Bomb bc it was way more dangerous. There are so many things that science and its progress could lead to that are a pandora's box (ex AI), that ethics in science are a MUST. And that issue is fascinating.
4- It is ironic that the leftwinger morons are arguing point 2, since the movie essentially can be interpretted as turning Oppenheimer into some left wing martyr of McCarthyism. Despite this, it has many and deeper points about the Deep State and its origins, along with the dangers of hubris with scientists and combining it with government which can be traced directly to the Manhattan Project.
5 - I have no idea whether Oppenheimer was a communist or just hung out with them bc academia is infested with them anyway. I don't buy any Hollywood interpretation that he was not a commie, bc again, Hollywood is infested with morons who think that being a communist is the epitome of virtue. The movie takes great pains to show that Oppenheimer was not a communist, even though he knew some communists. That said, I do believe he was loyal to his country and did not share any nuclear secrets with the USSR (as concluded by the Deep State itself at some point). There were other actual communists on the Manhattan Project approved by the goverment despite their communism - and so frick the MIC. We should have never given them security clearances, or let them be on the Manhattan Project.
6 - The origin of the Deep State was what they did to Oppenheimer.
7 - The movie is a study in the dangers of making scientists part of the government bc ultimately these scientists have to become politicians to survive. In light of recent events (cough Fauci and DOD research related to bioweapons), this is particularly compelling.
8- I should have never gone to see this movie bc I'm currently reading Dr. Mary's Monkey.
9- The Deep State will flat out wreck the life of any scientist who they find to be no longer useful, with zero consequences.
10- The Deep State needs to be obliterrated. Torn out Root and Branch.
ETA - Edited to fix numbering. But otherwise, please discuss.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 5:56 pm to Wednesday
quote:
2- Do not buy the left wing bullshite that the movie is somehow illustrating that we dropped the bomb only bc we had spent so much money and Japan was about to surrender anyway. The bomb was the only reason Japan surrendered and WWII ended. T
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:05 pm to Wednesday
After you read Dr. Mary’s Money please read the book by Lee Harvey Oswald’s mistress named Lee and Me.
The author of Lee and Me was a brillent Fla.high school scholar who was promised a medical school education to do science experiments into cancer and was sucked up into a CIA plot to kill Castro of Cuba.
Don’t have time to tell you anymore but the women went into hiding from the government cause she knew too much about how Oswald was framed.
The author of Lee and Me was a brillent Fla.high school scholar who was promised a medical school education to do science experiments into cancer and was sucked up into a CIA plot to kill Castro of Cuba.
Don’t have time to tell you anymore but the women went into hiding from the government cause she knew too much about how Oswald was framed.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:10 pm to Wednesday
The juxtaposition in one scene between the theory of black holes and a discussion of communism was pretty interesting. And the way his wife talked about why she turned against communism was really effective.
One of the better movies I have seen in a theater. It has stuck with me for days.
One of the better movies I have seen in a theater. It has stuck with me for days.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:10 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Wednesday
What is it about historical fact that bothers you? It's ok to be in favor of the bombings. It's just incorrect to say the Japanese wouldn't have surrendered if we hadn't dropped them when they offered surrender prior to knowing that they existed
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:13 pm to joshnorris14
Interesting that they didn’t just surrender instead of offering on terms
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:14 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Interesting that they didn’t just surrender instead of offering on terms
They didn't just surrender after the bombs. They offered terms.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:14 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
What is it about historical fact that bothers you?
It’s not a historical fact though. There are quite a few that dispute it.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:16 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:17 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
SeeeeK
What is funny about that statement?
What additional terms were added to their accepted terms in August?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:21 pm to Wednesday
10- The Deep State needs to be obliterrated. Torn out Root and Branch.
For me this is the only thing that matters now
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:21 pm to joshnorris14
LINK
Link is from US Dept of Energy. There was never a formal offer of surrender. The only information the US had was Japan engaging Russia for a negotiated peace that involved them keeping much of their wartime conquests. But, Russia didn’t even begin those talks before they declared war against Japan.
You are incorrect.
Link is from US Dept of Energy. There was never a formal offer of surrender. The only information the US had was Japan engaging Russia for a negotiated peace that involved them keeping much of their wartime conquests. But, Russia didn’t even begin those talks before they declared war against Japan.
You are incorrect.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:25 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
joshnorris14
quote:bullshite. Read some history.
The Japanese offered surrender an almost identical terms two months prior to the bombings.
Did the Japanese offer to surrender before Hiroshima?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:25 pm to Dixie Normus
quote:
The only information the US had was Japan engaging Russia for a negotiated peace that involved them keeping much of their wartime conquests.
This is inaccurate
quote:
Marquis Kido, Hirohito’s principal adviser, presented to him a memorandum proposing a path to peace in June 1945. Rejecting any direct approach to the United States, Kido urged a negotiated settlement achieved by Soviet mediation. As for settlement terms, Kido’s conjured up a copy of the Treaty of Versailles. Japan might have to give up her overseas conquests and endure a period of disarmament. But there would be no occupation of Japanese soil, thus assuring continuance of the imperial system and Hirohito’s seat on the throne. In view of Germany’s renewed war after the Treaty of Versailles, there is zero chance US leaders would have accepted that framework to end the war.
LINK
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:27 pm to Wednesday
I don’t understand why people even GAF about what the left says about dropping the bombs on Japan. frick them. The only way the bombings were wrong, was by improperly using them. Hindsight is always 20/20 but we should have dropped the first bomb on Tokyo, then the second one on Moscow. That’s the only way the dropping of the Atomic Bombs was wrong.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:27 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
bullshite. Read some history.
From your link:
quote:
Furthermore, the surrender that the “peace party” was contemplating was still miles away from the “unconditional surrender” demanded by the United States. There were conditions involved: mainly the preservation of the status and safety of the Emperor and the Imperial House, which they regarded as identical to the preservation of the Japanese nation.
Do you know when Hirohito stepped down as Emperor? When he died in 1989.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:30 pm to joshnorris14
You left out...
quote:
Japan was being governed at this point by a Supreme War Council, which was dominated by militarists who had no interest in peace. The “peace party” behind these feelers was a small minority of officials who were keeping their efforts secret from the rest of the Council, because they clearly feared they would be squashed
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:31 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Based on Kido’s memorandum, the emperor met with the inner cabinet, termed the Big Six for its membership. He secured their agreement to approach the Soviets. As noted in another part of this series, this effort remained stillborn. Prior to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Hirohito failed to intervene as the Soviet mediation effort went nowhere.
Unsurprising that you left off the next two paragraphs of the article you cited. Soviet mediation effort went nowhere due to inaction by the emporer.
Take the L baw.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 6:32 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
HubbaBubba
Do you mind viewing this from a critical lens? What changed before August 6th and after August 9th?
The conditions which the US would accept from Japanese surrender. In June, the US was demanding unconditional surrender, but in August, after the bombs were dropped, the US accepted a conditional surrender.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 6:33 pm
Popular
Back to top


27




