- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court just ruled that TX can deport illegals
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:31 pm to TigerAxeOK
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:31 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Am I correct in that postulation?
Believe so. Doesnt this precedent allow Orange to do mass deports with Govs of states?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:32 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
We all know what’s coming. Stay strapped my friends.
24/7, boss. 24/7. And I'm a very light sleeper.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:32 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
So, via precedent, this should mean that every state has the legal right to deport illegals who are unlawfully residing within their borders if they so choose...
I wonder what the sanctuary states would do.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:36 pm to Northshoretiger87
quote:
Anyone liberal claiming John Roberts is a conservative is fooling himself.
Heavily compromised
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:40 pm to Northshoretiger87
You could turn a "Barry Goldwater" conservative into a liberal if you had the videos that Epstein probably has on Roberts.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:46 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
So, via precedent, this should mean that every state has the legal right to deport illegals who are unlawfully residing within their borders if they so choose...
Am I correct in that postulation?
I think it's murkier than that. There is a concurrence that seems to put a lot of emphasis on the nature of the 5th Circuit stay (candidly I haven't seen the Court focus previously on what ACB is focused on) but it strikes me as something we can't lean too heavily on yet.
Don't get me wrong I think it's good, but here you had a district court judge finding the law unconstitutional, followed by a stay at the circuit court. And with two conservatives leaning heavily on a pretty administrative basis for not overturning the 5th Circuit stay, I just don't think we can have a ton of confidence it would absolutely be replicated.
It seems like we'll get some better clarity from the 5th before long and get a better idea of the long term fate of this legislation (and potentially those of other states intending to replicate).
Here's the intro to the ACB/Kav concurrence
quote:
If the Fifth Circuit had issued a stay pending appeal, this Court would apply the four-factor test set forth in Nken v. Holder—including, as relevant in this Court, an assessment of certworthiness—to decide whether to vacate it. 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009); Does 1–3 v. Mills, 595 U. S. ___, ___ (2021) (Barrett, J., concurring in denial of application for injunctive relief ). But the Fifth Circuit has not entered a stay pending appeal. Instead, in an exercise of its docket- management authority, it issued a temporary administrative stay and deferred the stay motion to a merits panel, which is considering it in conjunction with Texas’s challenge to the District Court’s injunction of S. B. 4. Thus, the Fifth Circuit has not yet rendered a decision on whether a stay pending appeal is warranted. That puts this case in a very unusual procedural posture.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:52 pm to idlewatcher
“Fire up 'dem buses baws! We goin' to DC and Cali!”
Fwiw….Texas taxpayers have spent over 154 million dollars bussing them to other places.. abbot said he would raise the cost from donations.. so far he has raised about 500 k….
Fwiw….Texas taxpayers have spent over 154 million dollars bussing them to other places.. abbot said he would raise the cost from donations.. so far he has raised about 500 k….
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:58 pm to keakar
quote:
so their olny other land bridge is southern california,
Allow me to introduce you to the states of New Mexico and Arizona.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:03 pm to EKG
quote:
US DOJ immigration courts ultimately hear such cases—they’re where the rubber meets the road.
I’m of the personal opinion this Union of states won’t last long enough for most of these cases to reach federal DOJ courts.
So no mass deportations? Is that what you are saying?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:12 pm to ronricks
Remains to be seen.
Arrests are very likely—which will bleed these small communities (tho I’m in total support of said incarcerations).
How DoJ responds is the unknown.
We’re in unknown territory here.
Arrests are very likely—which will bleed these small communities (tho I’m in total support of said incarcerations).
How DoJ responds is the unknown.
We’re in unknown territory here.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:23 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
I honestly liked it better when Texas was sending them to liberal cities specifically those that called themselves sanctuaries. Watching those cities deport migrants faster than a speeding bullet was hilarious.
When did these sanctuary cities deport anyone? I don’t remember that happening.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:35 pm to momentoftruth87
Whose the 3 knuckleheads that voted against this?
Posted on 3/20/24 at 6:41 am to udtiger
quote:good call. They did.
And I would expect the 5th Circuit to get involved shortly.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 6:47 am to bbvdd
New super serious COVID strain in 5 4 3 2 1
Popular
Back to top


0







