- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
South Carolina Senate President Shane Massey is blocking redistricting...
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:31 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:31 am
Per Caroline Wren and Sean Spicer just now on War Room. She also said Gov. Kemp is flat out refusing it in GA.
Cuck #1.
Cuck #2.

Cuck #1.
Cuck #2.

This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 9:41 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:35 am to loogaroo
100% they have something on these guys.
That first guy for sure.
That first guy for sure.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:41 am to loogaroo
Sellout #1 and Sellout #2.
I don't know anything about the South Carolina POS, but Kemp would already be in prison if we had anything approaching real justice in this country.
I don't know anything about the South Carolina POS, but Kemp would already be in prison if we had anything approaching real justice in this country.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:57 am to KCT
quote:
Kemp would already be in prison if we had anything approaching real justice in this country
I think the damage he's had to his reputation and stature is more than enough punishment.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:09 am to loogaroo
Gotta love them Massey/Massie’s …
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:11 am to loogaroo
I really loath POS like this. The GOP has a great opportunity to make things right in this country and finally give Democrats a piece of their own medicine and they puss out. No backbone, and soft.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:14 am to loogaroo
I literally don't understand the reluctance to redistrict. The Supreme Court has ruled that race-based districts are unconstitutional. All of the Southern states have race-based districts.
Why would any state want to proceed in affirming unconstitutional districts? I hope Trump's DOJ files something ASAP to challenge these districts being used for 2026.
Why would any state want to proceed in affirming unconstitutional districts? I hope Trump's DOJ files something ASAP to challenge these districts being used for 2026.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:18 am to loogaroo
If this was 1985, I’d probably be in the “play nice” camp, but for God’s sake, we’re in a fight for this nation’s survival with an America-hating Left, and we actually have a chance to save the country with redistricting and the SAVE Act. Time is of the essence, and these guys and Thune are traitors.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:37 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled that race-based districts are unconstitutional.
Should be a simple lawsuit to win in S Carolina and Georgia, then. I understand the desire to have it done by midterms, but some of these snakes aren’t having it.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:42 am to KCT
Kemp must be from before I really started watching politics closely, who's Wren and what did he do?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:44 am to Jspaspa3303
quote:
The GOP has a great opportunity to make things right in this country...
Agreed and very telling that they just haven’t seemed too eager to do so.
As corrupt and inept as the Democratic Party is, they have the great fortune of being “opposed” by the only political party in the world that has somehow proven itself even more inept and always willing to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory ….the GOP.
Aren’t we American citizens all so lucky to have these people “representing” and “serving” us.
Scoundrels.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:07 am to loogaroo
Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, also said redistricting this year would be “unlikely.”
Attempting to redraw the map to favor Republican candidates could make currently reliably red districts more of a toss-up,
Massey told reporters Thursday. South Carolina’s congressional map is drawn to heavily favor six Republican- and one Democrat-led districts. “I think you’re much more likely to get to a 5-2, maybe even a 4-3, scenario than a 7-0, if you start tinkering with it,” Massey said.
Attempting to redraw the map to favor Republican candidates could make currently reliably red districts more of a toss-up,
Massey told reporters Thursday. South Carolina’s congressional map is drawn to heavily favor six Republican- and one Democrat-led districts. “I think you’re much more likely to get to a 5-2, maybe even a 4-3, scenario than a 7-0, if you start tinkering with it,” Massey said.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 11:08 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:11 am to weagle1999
I would love to see how the numbers would play out if illegals hadn't been counted in the census (across the board in the US).
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 11:12 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:16 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
literally don't understand the reluctance to redistrict. The Supreme Court has ruled that race-based districts are unconstitutional. All of the Southern states have race-based districts.
Exactly. By refusing to redistrict they are actually defying the Supreme Court and thus the Constitution
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:20 am to loogaroo
We will all be better off when everyone understands that they are all on the same side.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 11:29 am to loogaroo
Looking sad y the numbers Massey seems to be wrong . Republicans average 50K(25%) more votes than democrats in congress races last election . At the least they should redistrict to make the democrat seat a toss up and force democrats to spent resources to keep the seat .
Posted on 5/4/26 at 12:33 pm to loogaroo
drhump betta listen to that judge who told him to stop building that tax-payer free ballroom.
SCOTUS made a rulling? frick them. we're not going to honor what they said.
SCOTUS made a rulling? frick them. we're not going to honor what they said.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 1:00 pm to loogaroo
LA going 6-0 would take some of the sting out of this but will it do that is the question?
In 2010 LA lost a seat and SC gained 1. LA could get to 6-0 right now (easily 5-1 just by reverting to previous map). But 6-0 can be achieved without being too radical.
If LA still had 7 seats it’d be very difficult to try to justify any 7-0 map (with BR and NOLA in the mix). I think this is some of what SC is facing today. But I think SC is in a better position to do so than LA would be to at least make 7-0 a real possibility with turnout numbers just staying typical. It will be a shame if they don’t take advantage of it.
LA has never had a Rep House sweep in its history while SC has (and that was 7-0 with its newly gained seat). 6-0 in LA along with 7-0 in SC would be a nightmare for the dims.
In 2010 LA lost a seat and SC gained 1. LA could get to 6-0 right now (easily 5-1 just by reverting to previous map). But 6-0 can be achieved without being too radical.
If LA still had 7 seats it’d be very difficult to try to justify any 7-0 map (with BR and NOLA in the mix). I think this is some of what SC is facing today. But I think SC is in a better position to do so than LA would be to at least make 7-0 a real possibility with turnout numbers just staying typical. It will be a shame if they don’t take advantage of it.
LA has never had a Rep House sweep in its history while SC has (and that was 7-0 with its newly gained seat). 6-0 in LA along with 7-0 in SC would be a nightmare for the dims.
Popular
Back to top


28








