Started By
Message

re: Should we dissolve the Army and Marines since no one wants boots on the ground ever again?

Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26292 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

with some of those missiles having 4,000 mile range capable of hitting Europe).

Well, thank goodness we have our European partners with us in all this.

Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29264 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

.. it's like hiring an entire fire department and the fire department gets yelled at by the public for going to put out fires in buildings.


Except the fire isn't even in your town and you're wondering why you're paying for it. And nobody is mad at the fire department, because the fire department didn't start the fire. Even with that in mind, kinda shite analogy.

quote:

These people who signed up for the military knew exactly what they were getting into and I am 99.9% confident that they are all ready for the task


Sure. They did, they do, and they are. I want the military for power projection and, if needed, defense. Someone attacks us? Sure go at it. Shock and awe.

I'm still not a fan of boots on the ground in Iran. This was sold as "liberating the people of Iran being crushed by the regime". These people haven't stepped up as of now. I don't want our guys dying for their cause.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

were firing off ballistic missiles throughout the Middle East (with some of those missiles having 4,000 mile range capable of hitting Europe).

Which other nations do we need to invade because they have the theoretical capability to attack Europe (or our allies elsewhere)?

I just want to be clear on the criteria for wasting time, lives, money, and resources accomplishing short term goals.
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
4012 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Yea.. it's like hiring an entire fire department and the fire department gets yelled at by the public for going to put out fires in buildings.


It's more like people are wondering why the fire department is going to put out fires for some other town in a different country for billions of dollars, when the fire was started by that other town preemptively and then got out of control. And after we've been told several times that the fire is already out and no fire could ever be more thoroughly out and that everything has gone according to plan fire-wise. And the town charter says that there has to be a formal declaration of fire before the fire department can be called out, but everyone just ignores that, even people who claim to be for strict enforcement of the town charter in other contexts.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4587 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:54 pm to
We’ve been a volunteer military since 1973. No one held a gun to these guys’ heads when they signed the dotted line. They willingly chose to serve with no obligation.

Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10331 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Which other nations do we need to invade because they have the theoretical capability to attack Europe (or our allies elsewhere)? I just want to be clear on the criteria for wasting time, lives, money, and resources accomplishing short term goals.


The next evil country that tries to develop nuclear weapons with a ballistic missile program. Right now Iran is the only one.

On the flip side of the coin, for the record, you’re good with a Totalitarian Radical Islamic Regime that chants “Death to America” standing as a permanent nuclear power?

All because you don’t want to use the military which consists of volunteers who are willing and able?
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Yea.. it's like hiring an entire fire department and the fire department gets yelled at by the public for going to put out fires in buildings.

It's absurd.

These people who signed up for the military knew exactly what they were getting into and I am 99.9% confident that they are all ready for the task


That might be a better comparison if the last time the fire department went to fight a fire, it took 20 years to put out and now 21 firefighters kill themselves every day because we're not taking care of them.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35934 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

So, now MAGA is 100% neocon ala Dick Cheney for forever wars and spending trillions overseas instead of investing the money back home. Good luck selling that platform to voters later this year and 2028. The backlash will be glorious.


No shite. This whole new MAGA mantra of "those fricks knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted" in defending putting troops on the ground in Iran is absolutely fricking wild.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 6:54 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

The next evil country that tries to develop nuclear weapons with a ballistic missile program. Right now Iran is the only one.


What defines a country as evil?
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10331 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

What defines a country as evil?


That’s self explanatory. If you can’t figure that one out you’ve got your head in the sand.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

No shite. This whole new mantra of "those fricks knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted" in defending putting troops on the ground in Iran is absolutely fricking wild.


OP strikes me as the kind of prick who has told a cop "I pay your salary" before.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

That’s self explanatory. If you can’t figure that one out you’ve got your head in the sand.


Well give me some qualifiers.

What kinds of things make a country evil? Because a lot of people would say that invading multiple countries for nefarious reasons is evil.
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10331 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Well give me some qualifiers. What kinds of things make a country evil? Because a lot of people would say that invading multiple countries for nefarious reasons is evil.


Head stuck in the sand.

Thanks for playing.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173695 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:10 pm to
This is a stupid argument for obvious reasons

No one is saying we shouldn't have a military and a military is definitely a necessity.

That doesn't justify launching stupid wars and never will.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:10 pm to
So no answers.

That checks out.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70678 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:13 pm to
Quakers are making a comeback, masked as “muh America First”
Posted by TigersWin88
Member since Mar 2022
475 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

These people who signed up for the military knew exactly what they were getting into and I am 99.9% confident that they are all ready for the task


I did 4 years during Trump’s first term. You don’t have a clue about what you are talking about.

Maybe 25% of the new enlistments sign up because they love the country.

Most just do it as a guaranteed job because they come from somewhere where the prospects are minimal and college just isn’t for them. Some do it to have their college paid for after and all the other great benefits (VA loan, disability, HC, etc.). And then you probably have about 25% who come from the hood and just want to buy a charger or Camaro.

And the saddest thing about the reality of our current situation is that the 25% who are the good ones and have family who served end up getting out because the enlisted leadership is mostly made up of those who stayed in for the wrong reasons.

It’s really that bad.

This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173695 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

So no answers.

That checks out.

Anyone that starts a thread this asinine is not going to have anything important to say
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26292 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

No shite. This whole new mantra of "those fricks knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted" in defending putting troops on the ground in Iran is absolutely fricking wild.

As someone replied in another thread, what would these same people have said if Biden had decided to do the same in Ukraine?

Situational principles.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13479 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Most Americans join the service to protect and defend the United States of America.


Anybody who objects to serving in combat in this military operation was a moron for signing up in the first place.

Because this is exactly the kind of operation we've engaged in for longer than I have been alive. Nobody can claim it's out of character or surprising.

You don't get to join the fire department but then say, "Well, I'm only here to go on 1st responder calls. That's why I signed up. I think fighting fires unnecessarily endangers firefighters and I don't want to go on those calls."

That's not how it works.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram