Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:460
Registered on:3/5/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

This is going to be great! It's like the 4th of July early.


Why are American boomers so demonic?
quote:

You should inform the Integralists of this.


Most actual integralists know what it is. It's the people who loosely throw the term around, like yourself, who do not.
quote:

But in actual practice all this really was was the church delegating those responsibilities to their lessors. The church held the real power. And you know this.


Not quite. St. Thomas Aquinas taught about the dyarchy of two distinct powers, both of which come from God. The temporal and the spiritual. The spiritual power is higher because man’s ultimate end is supernatural.

In matters concerning the salvation of souls, the temporal power is subordinate to the spiritual, which means that people must obey the Church rather than the State. In purely civil matters, the secular power has its own autonomy. The state should not usurp spiritual functions, nor the Church directly exercise temporal rule. That is besides the Vatican :lol:

If you actually read Church history, an entire saga called the Guelphs vs.Ghibellines is about the clash between these two authorites. This conflict shaped much of the world leading into the renaissance and is historically very important (Dante's work being a product of having lived through it).
quote:

To be clear, you believe every Catholic should advocate for and work towards a theocracy governed by the Pope?


Theocracy is not the same as Integralism, nor what the Catholic Church has practiced worldwide by doctrine since Constantine.

Theocracy involves the governing of clerics by sovereign power. No Catholic believes that a Bishop or Priest should be in charge of the military or the sewage and water board. The Catholic Church has always recognized secular rulers (Kings, Governors, etc.) as having authority over secular matters. But in order for a society to be harmonized toward the highest good (the salvation of souls), secular rulers should rule in unity and harmony with the Church (which holds the deposit of the true religon).

Pope Pius IX formally condemned the idea that "the Church ought to be separated from the State. And the State from the Church." And Pope Leo XIII, in a time where this belief was becoming prominent, taught similarly. "From this teaching, as from its source and principle, flows that fatal principle of the separation of Church and State; whereas it is, on the contrary, clear that the two powers, though dissimilar in functions and unequal in degree, ought nevertheless to live in concord, by harmony in their action and the faithful discharge of their respective duties."
quote:

And he’s Catholic. And an integralist.


Traditionally speaking, every Catholic should be an integralist. :lol:
It's always the people who actually shill for a foreign nation (israel) that claim others are tied to "foreign influence"

Every accusation is an admission.
quote:

Lol I sent all three of my kids to college. One joined the Air Force


Can you not read? It’s your generation that’s the problem. GFY
quote:

My parents survived the great depression never heard them blame anyone.


And they gave you a better life than they had. That’s always been the purpose that drove parents. That was, of course, until your generation.
quote:

Awe poor baby run up 100k plus on a worthless degree run debt for bullshite cell phones etc Blame it on your neighbor.


I’m doing fine. But I know a lot of people who are not and are struggling to get by.

Boomers are so selfish, that they can’t see the reason for our complaints about them is because we ACTUALLY care about our neighbors. For you, it’s just how much of the juice you can squeeze, not caring about what the children of your children will have to live with. You’re all so pathetic.
quote:

THEN WHY WOULD ANYBODY SIGN UP FOR IT, YOU frickING DROOLING IMBECILE?


If you go to the original post I made, explaining the situation from the perspective of someone who has actually served, unlike you, you would see the list of reasons.

quote:

if you believed that, you were/are a moron.


Good thing I didn’t vote for him.
quote:

Lol your gravy train was built by someone. Not you


People over 55 control over 70% of the nations wealth, up from 56% in the year 2000. People under 40 own 6% of the nations wealth. Only 37% of people under the age of 35 own a home. Meanwhile, the country has gained $35 trillion in debt.

Who do you think has to fix all the problems your moronic generation has caused? You people are the most selfish, blind, and retarded to have ever lived.

quote:

IT'S BEEN HAPPENING FOR LONGER THAN ANYONE HERE HAS BEEN ALIVE.


That’s exactly the problem, retard.

Didn’t Trump campaign on no new wars?
quote:

I am glad I won't be around if these younger Americans, who want to stick their heads in the sand, gain power. I cannot imagine a more naive out of touch bunch.


Your generation will go down as the absolute worst to have ever lived. Take a look in the mirror before you start levying your observations.
quote:

Care to enlighten us when this has happened? What wars have we fought “for Israel” ?


The Iraq War from 2003-2011 had nothing to do with 9/11.
quote:

You don't get to join the fire department but then say, "Well, I'm only here to go on 1st responder calls. That's why I signed up. I think fighting fires unnecessarily endangers firefighters and I don't want to go on those calls." That's not how it works.


Imagine signing up for the fire department, but the government that directs your fire department decides to start 5 fires a night indefinitely in a city that is not your own. Then that governing department makes you go fight the fires night after night that they caused.

This is a more honest interpretation of the situation. Yes, fighting the fires and saving people is a good thing. It’s what you signed up for and they want to do it. But it would also be reasonable for the firefighter to have objections about what is going on.

quote:

These people who signed up for the military knew exactly what they were getting into and I am 99.9% confident that they are all ready for the task


I did 4 years during Trump’s first term. You don’t have a clue about what you are talking about.

Maybe 25% of the new enlistments sign up because they love the country.

Most just do it as a guaranteed job because they come from somewhere where the prospects are minimal and college just isn’t for them. Some do it to have their college paid for after and all the other great benefits (VA loan, disability, HC, etc.). And then you probably have about 25% who come from the hood and just want to buy a charger or Camaro.

And the saddest thing about the reality of our current situation is that the 25% who are the good ones and have family who served end up getting out because the enlisted leadership is mostly made up of those who stayed in for the wrong reasons.

It’s really that bad.

re: MAGA 2024 vs MAGA 2026

Posted by TigersWin88 on 3/21/26 at 12:26 am to
quote:

When the donors (MIGA and MIC) pushed Rubio onto Trump. That was the deal in order to get JD the VP role.


Rubio is the Israeli/neo-con move forsure. But in my opinion, I think this administration runs a shadow state department with Kushner/Witkoff. The two of them are the ones handling all the actual duties of the Secretary of State.

I can't trust anyone who let Netanyahu sleep in their bed when they were younger. :yack:

I also have no clue why MAGA supports the move for Scott Bessent either. The guy is a homo who ran George Soros's investment fund for over a decade. His only accomplishment was cashing in on shorting the pound. An Al Gore, Obama, John McCain, and Hiliary Clinton supporter should be no where near an administration that claims to be "America First"
quote:

Dardar—————.200—-4/0
Yorke—————-.125——8/4
Caraway————.125——3/2


I'd like to see Braun get a fair shot at 1st. And maybe even Ruckert or Clauss at 2nd. Pearson needs to stay in the lineup, whether at 3rd or DH.
Keep applying sanctions to cripple their economy. States can fall without the use of military force. The Soviet Union is the perfect example of this.

Striking at Iran the way we did is like wacking a hornet's nest. Sure, the nest will fall. But the chances of you getting stung (economically in our case) is very, very high. And wacking the hornet's nest doesn't ensure that all the hornet's will die. You'll just get a new nest eventually, or multiple small ones that still cause problems.