- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
TigerIron
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3875 |
| Registered on: | 2/8/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Another SICK BURN on youtube from another Republican member of a majority that has passed frick all legislation despite having control of both houses and the presidency. Please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE and SEND MONEY.
1
quote:
Serious question.. changing to what?
Not gathering/ being on screens.
quote:
Jbird
115000 employees should all be working on what you want!
Not what I want. What the elected Congress and the elected President wanted. And passed a law to require. It's crazy that someone could call themselves a conservative and then dickride unelected bureaucrats just ignoring a specific federal law. Because it's been happening that way for a long time in the swamp, and apparently that makes it ok if you're a deep state enthusiast like yourself.
Btw you still have not given one actual reason that it's ok for DOJ to ignore the law.
quote:
Karen is upset the same shite that has happened for decades is sooooo upsetting.
Keep twerking for the deep state and making the very compelling argument "it's ok because the bureaucracy always does illegal shite." It's a great look.
P.S. you still have not offered any actual reason why it's ok for DOJ to ignore a law that Congress passed, and that the President who is in charge of DOJ personally signed, under a year ago.
Or even a reason why it makes good political sense to do it. Just release it all. They're already redacting the hell out of it. There's no good reason to keep this alive as a slow drip. If they'd just released the whole thing on this Friday afternoon the week before Christmas it will die down by New Year's Day. Stop giving them a stick to beat you with.
It's both illegal and terminally stupid.
quote:
Here’s a 100 page document that is entirely redacted
LINK
This release is a jok
I don't have a problem with redacting. Especially if the law allows or direct them to redact. What I have a problem with is the 115,000 employee DOJ saying "yeah, we didn't have time to do what you passed a law specifically to make us do."
quote:
I’m sure they have a team working on it. I’d rather the FBI/DOJ focus and stopping terrorists, cartels, murderers, etc.
there are no lives that will be lost in the next few weeks as more documents are released.
The DOJ exists to do what Congress and the President tell it to do. In this case they both -- Congress and President --told it to do a specific thing by a specific date. The DOJ doesn't just get to say "nah, we have other shite to do."
quote:
Impeachment then go for it.
You're melting.
What's your best argument for the DOJ not doing something both Congress and the President directly, clearly, and recently told it to do by a specific date--in an actual law, not an executive order?
You already tried "Clintons did it!" and are now babbling about impeachment. Got anything else?
quote:
This
Has
Happened
Multiple
Times
Including
Clinton
Investigations
If
It
Was
Wrong
Then
It's
Wrong
Now
I don't give a shite about your whatabout smokescreen arguments. The DOJ should obey the law especially when there is a specific, recent law directly telling DOJ to do something by a certain date.
If it's doesn't, that's as "deep state" as it gets.
re: Epstein files have begun to be released
Posted by TigerIron on 12/19/25 at 3:40 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Americans are way too cynical - everything could be released and people will still scream conspiracy.
Congress passed a law requiring that everything be released and the President signed that law. Whatever you think of that, when the DOJ ignores a specific, targeted law with a clear directive to DOJ with a specific, targeted deadline, DOJ is violating the law. Which is a bad look for the agency in charge of enforcing the law.
quote:
e ones not released yet are where the key data is. Meghan McMassie.
Then
The real data is in the classified data
Meghan McMassie.
The DOJ has 115,000 employees. Congress passed a bill requiring them to release all the files within 30 days and the President signed it. They did not do it. The administration just keeps shooting itself in the dick on the Epstein stuff, and it's really unclear why.
re: Brown University Shooting Thread: UPDATE, Also Suspect in MIT murder; Committed Suicide
Posted by TigerIron on 12/19/25 at 11:16 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Like most, I was annoyed with the communication style with the Rhode Island gang. For instance, TELL the public what the shooter was reported by some to have said.
Ultimately, good for them, they solved the case.
They bungled the case, and have been completely inept in sharing information about the case and answering questions about the case.
re: Brown University Shooting Thread: UPDATE, Also Suspect in MIT murder; Committed Suicide
Posted by TigerIron on 12/19/25 at 11:13 am to SundayFunday
quote:
+Why was the university wiping their system clean of 1 particular person that happened to match the description/potentially had ideological motives to kill people and who totally had nothing to do with the situation?
I don't know the truth of what happened, but one reason could be that internet sleuths found that person and accused him of being the murderer since he was Palestinian and had pronouns in his profile, without any real evidence that he was a suspect.
re: How plausible is this political framework heading into the '28 GOP Primary?
Posted by TigerIron on 12/19/25 at 10:31 am to Sassafrasology
So sick about hearing about podcaster drama. They were helpful in 2024 but now they're like a bunch of high school girls. Nobody cares. They are also all going to lose their audiences the more they focus on infighting and arguments that require you to trace a bunch of meaningless shite said on 8 different podcasts that only a true shut-in would have time to listen to all of.
re: Former (Homeless) Brown University Grad Whose Reddit Post All But Cracked the Case
Posted by TigerIron on 12/19/25 at 9:25 am to Finklesteins Kid
re: Has anyone ever bought a product because of a tv commercial?
Posted by TigerIron on 12/18/25 at 8:53 pm to SallysHuman
Head On. But then I lost the instructions and couldn't figure out how to use it.
quote:
A lot of reporting that over the summer leftist and muzzies made brown disable security cameras so they couldnt be identified. Who knows if they did or not though
If so the family of the girl who got shot should sue them for hundreds of millions of dollars, and, the adminstration should yank every dollar of their federal funding.
quote:
A vince foster suicide
If you are just going to drop a shot body and call it a suicide, a storage unit seems like a pretty good place to set that sort of thing up.
quote:
I would have slammed that bitch on her head.
The guy probably knew he'd get fired and/ or sued if he did. I do hope he sues the shite out of her though.
re: Brown University Shooting Thread: UPDATE, Also Suspect in MIT murder; Committed Suicide
Posted by TigerIron on 12/18/25 at 4:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
If the MIT and Brown shootings are same guy, my brain is fried:) Only academic link would be "physics," but Brown was an ECON class that happened to be in a physics-related building.
The MIT prof was jewish and pro-israel
The Brown study session was for an ECON class taught by a prof who also teaches in judaic studies.
These are both things I've seen, not 100% sure they're true. If they are true the link would seem to be pretty obvious.
re: Tulsi is back in the spotlight
Posted by TigerIron on 12/18/25 at 3:27 pm to AmateurMenace
More twitter BOMBSHELLS than Dresden in 1945 and yet nothing ever comes of any of it.
quote:
Why 2 names? Repetitive. You realize rebranding will cost quite a bit of $. Tax payer $.
It will cost tax payers about $1 billion to rebrand form DOD to DOW. For what reason?
Lol. I'm sure that's what you said when the changed the names on all the streets, schools, army bases, and mountains, too.
Popular
12
