- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:31 pm to jammajin
quote:
I can’t believe you said somebody said something stupid and then followed it up with this gem
You're stupid if you think Iran is a threat to the United States. I'm sorry. That's the truth.
Does Kim Jong Un keep you up at night?
This bombing isn't going to take this regime down so let me ask you, how many thousands more of American soldiers should die or be maimed in order to neutralize this imaginary threat?
Give me a number. I promise you the American public has zero interest in it.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 11:11 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
We’ve been a volunteer military since 1973. No one held a gun to these guys’ heads when they signed the dotted line. They willingly chose to serve with no obligation.
Some joined because of false propaganda.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 11:30 pm to TigernMS12
quote:
Not to mention Trump ran on not starting wars and being a peacemaker
And when the other side refuses to negotiate, you don't just tuck your tail and go home. If you don't back up your words, then no one will take you seriously.
If we did nothing after Iran told us they weren't going to stop enrichment and refused a lifetime of free energy, do you think they would be less inclined to continue pursuit of a bomb?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 11:42 pm to Stidham8
There are only two instances in American history where Americans have truly fought for “freedom” - the Revolutionary War and the war for Southern Independence. WWI was based on lies (sinking of the Lusitania), and so was Vietnam.
Pearl Harbor justified our entry into WWII, but there is evidence out there that U.S. intel was aware long before the attack of the threat and that nothing substantial was done to prevent it. The implication is that the U.S. government was prepared to enter the war and needed a compelling reason.
9/11 was not the act of a country, but a terrorist network. Letters of marque and reprisal should have been issued to capture bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Not spend 20 years in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Pearl Harbor justified our entry into WWII, but there is evidence out there that U.S. intel was aware long before the attack of the threat and that nothing substantial was done to prevent it. The implication is that the U.S. government was prepared to enter the war and needed a compelling reason.
9/11 was not the act of a country, but a terrorist network. Letters of marque and reprisal should have been issued to capture bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Not spend 20 years in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 11:58 pm to Stidham8
quote:
The next evil country that tries to develop nuclear weapons with a ballistic missile program. Right now Iran is the only one.
There’s North Korea & there’s also the fact that bombing away nuclear programs isn’t guaranteed to work.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 12:28 am
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:10 am to DeathByTossDive225
What “bombing away” of North Korean nuclear program? Do you know something everyone else doesn’t??
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:18 am to davyjones
I just worded the post badly. Fixed.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:39 am to DeathByTossDive225
Innocent mistake. I do think it might raise a salient point, however. Which is, this being just my opinion I suppose, that the two situations, those of Iran and NoKo, are of course of similar subject matter, but distinct in some rather significant and consequential ways. Distinct enough to render it unreasonable and unrealistic to compare one “against” the other.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:12 am to Stidham8
This is a ridiculous line of thinking and is usually an opinion harbored by people who never served.
I stood watch during the Cold War and I can tell you none of us wanted diplomacy to fail to a point where nukes would be exchanged (which was a certainty if we used forced on the USSR).
The likelihood of escalation is inevitable in this day and age, which not only needlessly kills Americans with families, but civilians who can’t escape a combat zone.
I stood watch during the Cold War and I can tell you none of us wanted diplomacy to fail to a point where nukes would be exchanged (which was a certainty if we used forced on the USSR).
The likelihood of escalation is inevitable in this day and age, which not only needlessly kills Americans with families, but civilians who can’t escape a combat zone.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 3:55 am to Stidham8
Technology is going to make boots on the ground moot and having a 10 million man army or whatever China has irrelevant as they will be sitting ducks to be obliterated by lasers, fire, explosions, etc from advanced drones etc.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:36 am to Cuz413
quote:
The reason why some of the founding generation opposed a standing military is because they believed eventually the central government would use that military for it's own means.
Apparently they were right again.
How exactly were they right again?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:37 am to Tiger985
quote:
Most Americans join the service to protect and defend the United States of America.
I kinda doubt that. Military is a last resort or only option for many people.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 9:07 am
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:44 am to i am dan
quote:
How exactly were they right again?
How much non congressionally approved military (including CIA ops) frickery would you have to see in your lifetime to know that if there was no standing military or central intelligence that could be authorized or commanded to intervene in another nation's business at the behest of the POTUS or a minority of Congress was not in the best interest of the average American citizen?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:44 am to Deuces
quote:
Just because we aren’t geographically close to them doesn’t matter.
It matters quite a bit actually. Iran possesses no ICBMs and they lack the budget to develop them. Likewise, China and Russia will never supply Iran with ICBMs because they know what a nuclear-armed Iran with the capability of reaching the United States will mean for the global economy.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:52 am to Brosef Stalin
Apparently the Democrats don’t.
How about, if a DEMOCRAT DROPS OFF PALLETS OF CASH…..HE GETS IMPEACHED AT ANY LEVEL
How about, if a DEMOCRAT DROPS OFF PALLETS OF CASH…..HE GETS IMPEACHED AT ANY LEVEL
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:20 am to wadewilson
quote:
I have been paying attention
Then you are just stupid.
Because nothing you have posted yet addresses the statement.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 8:21 am
Popular
Back to top

0








