1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SFP- This is Lawfare
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:11 am to michael corleone
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:11 am to michael corleone
He fancies himself to be Mr. Spock.
No emotion, just rationality and logic.
Which is fine, because being logical and rational is very important.
No emotion, just rationality and logic.
Which is fine, because being logical and rational is very important.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:15 am to SlowFlowPro
Actually its exactly like that . The US has not declared a war in 70 years, yet the elites seem to get us in the thick of battle about 33 times in that 70 years.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:17 am to TrueTiger
quote:
No emotion, just rationality and logic.
Only when doing analytical or other behaviors that are EV+ when emotions are removed. That's the important caveat.
Even things like poker. I play for fun occasionally and not to optimize my choices/outcomes.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:20 am to cajunangelle
They have a list of prosecutions that they’ll ONLY pursue if they win all or part of Congress.
#nosuchthingaslawfare
#nosuchthingaslawfare
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:21 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
They have a list of prosecutions that they’ll ONLY pursue if they win all or part of Congress.
#nosuchthingaslawfare
How can they pursue prosecutions if they win all or part of Congress?
State-based prosecutions? Why would winning Congress affect those?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Interpretation of the law is a whole other subject. I’m talking about rulings and orders that directly flaunt the laws as written. These are what I consider Lawfare. The rule of law is neither Republican or Democrat, it is as it is written. The law doesn’t take sides.
You’d be hard pressed to find a single instance of a Republican/conservative judge who has issued a ruling or order that directly contradicts the written laws of our nation. However, these Democrat and Bush appointed judges do this on an almost daily basis. That is why this is not a “both sides do it” issue.
You’d be hard pressed to find a single instance of a Republican/conservative judge who has issued a ruling or order that directly contradicts the written laws of our nation. However, these Democrat and Bush appointed judges do this on an almost daily basis. That is why this is not a “both sides do it” issue.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Boesberg is a federal judge.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How can they pursue prosecutions if they win all or part of Congress?
State-based prosecutions? Why would winning Congress affect those?
They will lie in Congressional hearings, then pass it over to their puppet state judges wherever they need to. Are you going to say that the democrats have never held circus hearings to drive specious prosecutions?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP said strawman in a post.
Drink.
Drink.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:22 am to i am dan
it is
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:51 am to RandRules
Don’t argue with a narcissist.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what lawfare is to support or oppose it
Not trying hard enough.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"Legals systems" includes the admin using subpoenas, grand juries, threats of prosecution, etc.
This is like a Monty Python skit. Just silliness
Did a Cali judge stop ballot segregation of possible illegal alien ballots? YES
Did the DOJ request to segregate ballots stop illegals from voting? NO
Did a Boasberg ruling stop the DOJ from investigating the FED? YES
Did impaneling a grand jury stop the Fed from performing its duty? NO
Would a ruling by Boasberg to unseal Ilhans search warrant impede the investigation? YES
Does a request to seal the search warrant stop Ilhan from remaining in the US or the Congress? NO
No even close to being examples of the admin using lawfare. It just reinforces the point of posters on here that you have chosen a side, and your main purpose is to deflect from their guilt
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:03 pm to RandRules
quote:
Ballots have already been issued. Americans have already begun voting. Workers have already begun processing ballots,” Thompson wrote. “Given the consequences of inaction, the Court sees no reason to delay its ruling.”
What the judge is saying is quite clear. The necessary ballots for a sweeping DSA victory in CA have already been mailed out, we're not screwing this up now.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
So these “crimes” only become crimes if Dems have power?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what lawfare is to support or oppose it
You should stop calling yourself a "near-genius" (lol) then.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:54 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
This is like a Monty Python skit. Just silliness
Did a Cali judge stop ballot segregation of possible illegal alien ballots? YES
Did the DOJ request to segregate ballots stop illegals from voting? NO
Did a Boasberg ruling stop the DOJ from investigating the FED? YES
Did impaneling a grand jury stop the Fed from performing its duty? NO
Would a ruling by Boasberg to unseal Ilhans search warrant impede the investigation? YES
Does a request to seal the search warrant stop Ilhan from remaining in the US or the Congress? NO
You may want to learn how to respond relevantly
quote:
No even close to being examples of the admin using lawfare.
You're ignoring the definition he used. For the third time.
By the definition he provided, and within the context he requested, it is lawfare.
All you're doing is saying that lawfare is something else, which proves my point.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:55 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
So these “crimes” only become crimes if Dems have power?
What?
I never said there were any crimes at all. Are you drunk?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:56 pm to RandRules
quote:
You’d be hard pressed to find a single instance of a Republican/conservative judge
quote:
However, these Democrat and Bush appointed judges
Bush appointed judges are almost exclusively conservative
And yes, even the 5th circuit gets reversed on occasion, and they're the most conservative appellate circuit in the US federal system.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:57 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Boesberg is a federal judge.
And?
What does that have to do with this
quote:
They have a list of prosecutions that they’ll ONLY pursue if they win all or part of Congress.
#nosuchthingaslawfare
?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News