
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SFP- This is Lawfare
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:57 pm to RohanGonzales
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:57 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
They will lie in Congressional hearings
He said prosecutions.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:57 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
You should stop calling yourself a "near-genius" (lol) then.
...why?
The point is WAY over your head.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 12:58 pm to i am dan
quote:
SFP said strawman in a post.
Drink.
People make shite up and can't argue honestly. It is what it is.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 2:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
Holy gaslighting Batman
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:05 pm to Vacherie Saint
Bro YOU started this digression with this insanity
Prosecutions are from the executive. The executive isn't on the ballot. I made fun of it by asking you to clarify what the frick that rambling is about, and you then pivot to asking me about crimes...when I never referenced crimes...only your terrible attempt at a point.
quote:
They have a list of prosecutions that they’ll ONLY pursue if they win all or part of Congress.
#nosuchthingaslawfare
Prosecutions are from the executive. The executive isn't on the ballot. I made fun of it by asking you to clarify what the frick that rambling is about, and you then pivot to asking me about crimes...when I never referenced crimes...only your terrible attempt at a point.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Prosecutions are NOT only from the Executive. "Peachmints" are prosecutions are they not, ?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:15 pm to antibarner
quote:
"Peachmints" are prosecutions are they not, ?
They are not.
*ETA: this was discussed at length during that era and many (incorrectly) argued they were required for prosecutions of Presidents. I argued (correctly) this was retard logic. But it shows the two processes are different things (especially my side, which was right)
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
bullshite. Gotcha. They prosecute a case and if convicted the accused is removed from office.
You're not wiggling out of this one.
You're not wiggling out of this one.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:18 pm to antibarner
quote:
bullshite. Gotcha.
You probably replied before the ETA
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:25 pm to antibarner
LINK
I don't give a damn what Slo Pro BS argued.
quote:
The House of Representatives then appoints certain members of Congress to act as managers of the trial, similar to “prosecutors.”
I don't give a damn what Slo Pro BS argued.
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You have to consider that your perspective is that of a fricking lawyer, so you believe anything you twist with brazen wordplay is "brilliant" while normal people do not look at it that way.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:29 pm to RohanGonzales
When the facts arent on his side he tries to blind them with horseshite. The impeachment process is a prosecution, end of story.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Ask Slotkin what she meant by that.
Better yet, stop pretending to be stupid
Better yet, stop pretending to be stupid
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:44 pm to Vacherie Saint
Hes not. He's pretending to be smarter than he really is.

Popular
Back to top


0








