- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS will not fast track Jack Smith’s bull shite case against DJT.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:26 pm to Revelator
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:26 pm to Revelator
quote:
Though the SC had chosen not to expedite the case, do we know for certain it won’t be heard before the election?
We don’t know that for certain, but what is certain is that the list of things to fit in before the election is now almost certainly too long and protracted to shoehorn a trial between now and election time - most definitely primaries and very likely same for the general. Could the district court judge force it to happen, perhaps, but it would be so blatantly obvious what the judge is attempting to do from a personal bias standpoint that, well, it’s just highly unlikely.
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 2:28 pm
0
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:29 pm to David_DJS
quote:
You believe more than a few DeSantis supporters are cheering for Jack Smith?
About half
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:30 pm to Rebel
Dixrider and company will not be happy!
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:32 pm to Rebel
Suggestions from former clerks that with no dissents it was unanimous.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:32 pm to Jbird
quote:
Dixrider and company will not be happy!
I am eagerly waiting to see if any of them show up here.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:34 pm to Deuces
quote:
The SCOTUS knows what’s going on. They ain’t that dumb.
One of them is.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:41 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
100%
I think you're wrong. I don't take notes while participating in these threads but my recollection - the vast majority of DeSantis primary supporters are like me, absolutely not cheering for Jack Smith, quite the opposite in fact.
quote:
Look at the fraud threads. Most of those cowards don’t even show up bc they would have to admit there was frickery. Some of you are less than honorable.
You need to consider the experience of someone that shows up in those threads that believes there was fraud, substantially more than normal driven by Covid BS in 2020, to a degree that definitely changed outcomes, but don't believe every single claim of fraud or express disappointment in the ineptitude of those making some of the claims. It gets boring.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:49 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
And so they don’t have to answer the brief filed by Ed Meese team? They challenged the constitutionality of Smiths appointment. Said there is no law for him to authorize his existence as special counsel.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:53 pm to Revelator
quote:
Though the SC had chosen not to expedite the case, do we know for certain it won’t be heard before the election?
There is no way to know. Since SCOTUS denied the motion for certiorari before judgment (nobody in the legal profession should have given that more than a 1% chance of happening) the question of immunity drops back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia where the arguments on the issue are set for January 9. Then it depends on the expediency of the appeals court in making their ruling and then how quickly SCOTUS deals accepts or denies cert in the guaranteed appeal to them. Something like this could move very quickly or very slowly just depending on how much emphasis on speed the two courts give it. The issue of immunity could be resolved by the end of January (especially if SCOTUS denies cert) or it could be still up in the air this time next year.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:53 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:lol you watch Fox News
Breaking on Fox News right now
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:55 pm to Revelator
Trial was already scheduled 2 days before Super Tuesday.
Even if 9th Circuit expedites it, Orange has one appeal option before going to SCOTUS.
So yea, no way it gets heard before Super Tuesday. Not to mention all of the other cases Smith will have to reschedule around.
Even if 9th Circuit expedites it, Orange has one appeal option before going to SCOTUS.
So yea, no way it gets heard before Super Tuesday. Not to mention all of the other cases Smith will have to reschedule around.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:56 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
lol you watch Fox News
What do you watch?
Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:58 pm to BlueDogTiger
quote:
And so they don’t have to answer the brief filed by Ed Meese team? They challenged the constitutionality of Smiths appointment. Said there is no law for him to authorize his existence as special counsel
They can present an amicus to the DC Circuit (where appeal is pending). That court is imposing very abbreviated briefing delays (Trump's brief is due tomorrow, I think)
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:03 pm to Rebel
God bless us, everyone!
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:04 pm to Rebel
Having SOCTUS bounce Jack Smiths case would have been better.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:06 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What do you watch?
The first 48. Watching to see if he sees anyone he knows.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:15 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Having SOCTUS bounce Jack Smiths case would have been better.
I don’t think what you’re suggesting would even be possible, my fella.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:23 pm to Rebel
Turtle did the best thing in refusing Garland a seat at the big table
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:39 pm to Rebel
Just another notch in the belt of Jack Smith frick ups
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:53 pm to TDTOM
quote:
The first 48. Watching to see if he sees anyone he knows.
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News