- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:55 pm to davyjones
Election night 2024 is going to be 10x more epic than 2016 was.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 3:57 pm to Rebel
quote:
SCOTUS will not fast track Jack Smith’s bull shite case
Posted on 12/22/23 at 4:04 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think you're wrong. I don't take notes while participating in these threads but my recollection - the vast majority of DeSantis primary supporters are like me, absolutely not cheering for Jack Smith, quite the opposite in fact.
then you are either intentionally denying reality, or you are even more dementia riddled then potato brain is.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 4:06 pm to NC_Tigah
That dude’s self awareness wiring is completely fouled up, I can see smoke from electrical fire coming from his ears. So this guy who already has a very bad reputation within Supreme Court circles thought he would be able to slip in a historically abysmal application to that same Court. What an embarrassment to the profession. And to his family.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 4:07 pm to CamdenTiger
Done
Posted on 12/22/23 at 4:30 pm to keakar
quote:
then you are either intentionally denying reality, or you are even more dementia riddled then potato brain is.
You're asking me to accept your opinion as fact, and you've demonstrated over and over in these threads an incapability/unwillingness to consider anything related to Trump rationally.
Name the Ronbots that are cheering on Smith.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 4:36 pm to Rebel
I don’t know why anyone views this can-kicking as a good thing.
No one on any side of the political spectrum should want this dumb shite lingering over the election.
No one on any side of the political spectrum should want this dumb shite lingering over the election.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:14 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I don’t know why anyone views this can-kicking as a good thing.
Then you don’t know anyone that prefers to follow our legal processes.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:16 pm to Rebel
quote:
Then you don’t know anyone that prefers to follow our legal processes.
Oh then by all means educate me
Please explain why going through completely pointless machinations at the DC Circuit level is in anyone’s interest? What grave principle of legal process am I missing?
SCOTUS is going to ultimately decide the issue anyways, and would have been well within their constitutional power to grant the emergency request.
Eta: regardless, you don’t address my question— why would anyone actually want this issue lingering over the election? If anything, it only hurts Trump.
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:16 pm to davyjones
quote:
I don’t think what you’re suggesting would even be possible, my fella.
Reviewing the Meese amicus wouldn’t have allowed for such a ruling? Need the attorneys on here to chime in.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:18 pm to BlueDogTiger
quote:
Reviewing the Meese amicus wouldn’t have allowed for such a ruling?
Amicus briefs have no inherent value. It’s like sending a paper airplane note to the Court. They can read it, adopt it, agree or disagree with it, or throw it away unopened at their leisure.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:35 pm to davyjones
quote:I'm pretty sure if they the Court held up presidential immunity, there wouldn't have been much to prosecute. Am I missing something?
I don’t think what you’re suggesting would even be possible, my fella.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:37 pm to BlueDogTiger
quote:An amicus brief amounts to a "strongly worded letter". SCOTUS doesn't even have to read them, muchless "review" them.
Reviewing the Meese amicus wouldn’t have allowed for such a ruling?
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:43 pm to Taxing Authority
Could be me that’s missing something, as I’m working off of assumptions. In a nutshell, I thought the Court declined to hear it at this stage essentially because it’s not ripe for their review unless and until there’s an application by either side for review of the appellate court’s decision.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
They can read it, adopt it, agree or disagree with it, or throw it away unopened at their leisure.
Ideally be persuaded by it/them.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:44 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
He’ll be along shortly to tell you that SCOTUS made the wrong decision
I don't think I ever made a comment about what I thought they would do, just that this is what I've been hearing for years that Trump supporters wanted. They always reference these cases going to the Supreme Court.
I mean if you don't want these cases to go to the Supreme Court then cool just make your desires known and clear.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:45 pm to davyjones
quote:
thought the Court declined to hear it at this stage essentially because it’s not ripe for their review unless and until there’s an application by either side for review of the appellate court’s decision.
The Court didn’t give reasons. Just denied to hear it. Which is normal.
It’s disappointing IMO because of how pointless the appeals process is in this instance. Completely pointless for the circuit to hear the case. It’s a case of first impression and will be ultimately decided by SCOTUS anyway. I fail to see the merit in demanding that the DC Circuit rule first.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:48 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I'm pretty sure if they the Court held up presidential immunity, there wouldn't have been much to prosecute. Am I missing something?
I don't think so. It would be over. This case at least
Posted on 12/22/23 at 5:48 pm to Indefatigable
To have other judges analyze and opine on the matter. That’s the normal course of business. I didn’t really understand the argument to deviate from that to begin with.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News