- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:25 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
Of course Roberts and Barrett side with the liberals to allow ballots to be received post election day.
fricking clown world.. Election DAY, not DAYS!!
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:25 am to lionward2014
quote:
Huge win for the 4th Amendment.
Is it? Should we be happy police can't use geofence data to find people who were in the vicinity of a crime when the crime took place? What's next, they can't use video cameras in an area where a crime took place?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:25 am to GooseSix
My understanding from those that watch the Court is that BRC isn't coming today. But who knows
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:25 am to rt3
quote:
Court says asking for Geofence data IS a 4th Amendment search So police need a proper search warrant for that type of information
I think the question was whether those general warrants are constitutional. The way it works is the warrant demands a company like Google provide the locations, texts, emails, etc of EVERYONE that entered into an area near a crime scene during a certain timeframe. It’s a problem because it sweeps up a lot of innocent people
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:25 am to udtiger
quote:
Cook can.
she gets here case heard in the lower courts while holding her position. still leaves open that this case could be reheard once the lower courts make a judgement
quote:
Slaughter is out.
court said that putting requirements like "for cause" violated the separation of powers. basically killed the 1935 USSC ruling "Humphrey’s Executor,"
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:26 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Seems like a strange ruling, because they did obtain a warrant in this case.
They remanded to the lower court to determine if the search was reasonable and supported by probable cause, so the use of Geofence data might still be okay for that case.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:26 am to deltaland
quote:
I think the question was whether those general warrants are constitutional. The way it works is the warrant demands a company like Google provide the locations, texts, emails, etc of EVERYONE that entered into an area near a crime scene during a certain timeframe. It’s a problem because it sweeps up a lot of innocent people
Yeah, if someone robs me at gunpoint my biggest concern is definitely whether or not the government will see my text messages during the time of the crime.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:27 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
My understanding from those that watch the Court is that BRC isn't coming today. But who knows
they are done for today.....waiting ot hear the next date to deliver decisions and when the end of the term is (and all decisions will be read by date)
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:27 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Yeah, if someone robs me at gunpoint my biggest concern is definitely whether or not the government will see my text messages during the time of the crime.
You really can't think of a situation where this is a bad thing?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:28 am to GooseSix
Well republicans better learn to play fricking ball then. When the democrats show up with a truck full of ballots, show up with an even bigger truck with more ballots. Nobody said it was fair but life isn’t fair, the USSC basically told the good guys we have 5 days to print ballots and dump them. So let’s out cheat the commies, they’ll be clamoring for election changes soon after.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:28 am to deltaland
quote:
I think the question was whether those general warrants are constitutional. The way it works is the warrant demands a company like Google provide the locations, texts, emails, etc of EVERYONE that entered into an area near a crime scene during a certain timeframe. It’s a problem because it sweeps up a lot of innocent people
Right
It's the difference between a cast net catching all the fish in an area & a fishing line catching just 1 fish
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:30 am to Ingeniero
quote:
You really can't think of a situation where this is a bad thing?
No, I can't see a situation where it is a bad thing that law enforcement can see who was in an area at the time a crime took place and develop a list of suspects from that information.
"We know the crime took place at this time, and we know it took place at this location. Oh well, too bad no one saw the suspect. Now we'll never know who did it."
Only result of this is fewer crimes will be solved. Let's just keep making it so difficult to investigate and solve crimes that no one ever goes to jail.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 9:31 am
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:31 am to imjustafatkid
Republicans getting cooked today I see lmao.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:32 am to Ingeniero
Got to have good Democrat gooberment.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:32 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Let's just keep making it so difficult to investigate and solve crimes that no one ever goes to jail.
To be fair, it really doesn’t matter if a crime is solved because most DAs and judges won’t send anyone to jail anyway.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:32 am to Bonkers119
quote:
Republicans getting cooked today I see lmao.
Is that what you think is happening? Very shallow thought process there.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Yeah, if someone robs me at gunpoint my biggest concern is definitely whether or not the government will see my text messages during the time of the crime.
“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”- Benjamin Franklin
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Almost everyone I have seen believes they will punt on the actual issue and make it about the EO, unfortunately
That would be the appropriate decision imo. Anything beyond that would venture into “legislating from the bench” territory.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 am to rt3
quote:
Right
It's the difference between a cast net catching all the fish in an area & a fishing line catching just 1 fish
Not really. There's no way to write a warrant to say "we want this one guy's cell phone data" when you don't know who the guy is.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News