LawTalkingGuy

quote:

---

Decision makers familiar with the voting and counting process anticipated fraud was highly possible, unless procedures were put in place to prevent it.

---

The procedures for signing yhe tapes are just to ensure the electronic vote tallies accurate, not to prevent fraud. Since there were multiple hand recounts of the paper ballots, the electronic tallies are kind of moot. If there had been some huge discrepancy between the original electronic totals and the hand recount totals, then there would be an issue.

quote:

---

What about this:

---

What you quoted has absolutely nothing to do with the hand recount of the paper record.

The daily tabulations for early in person voting were not properly authenticated. But the totals all matched up and were verified in multiple hand recounts.

quote:

---

Counting 315k illegal ballots that were counted the first time, and subsequently recounting and recounting the same fraudulent ballots doesn’t change anything.

---

You really don't understand what this is about. This story does not involve fraudulent ballots

quote:

---

There were definitely some shady actors involved in the 2020 election that had agendas and manipulated the system

---

I think there was mostly simple incompetence. Our election system has been sloppy and haphazard forever, but elections usually are not close enough for the incompetence to matter. Most of the highly contentious, razor thin margin elections are local, and dont result in massive changes to the system.

The 2000 election revealed the flaws in our system, along with the surprising revelation that it is virtually impossible to accurately count a couple million votes, even using computers.

While Florida was being embarrassed nationally, other states were looking at their own voting systems and realizing changes needed to be made. We still haven't eliminated the flaws, though.

The 2000 election caused Georgia to make massive election changes, including the shift to computerized voting machines. Bush won Georgia easily in 2000, but they realized the statistics in their voting results looked way worse than Florida's.

quote:

---

I just provided statistical evidence and I'm not going to listen to a video explaining your point for you.

---

You provided a drawing, based on no data or anything.

quote:

---

I know I damn sure could not and would not ever sit by and watch either of my children live homeless.

---

I can only assume you have never dealt with drug addiction in your family.

It sucks...it really, really sucks...but eventually the parents of drug addicts all figure out the best thing they can do for their addicted child is nothing at all. Let them live on the street, doing unthinkable things, until they realize they need help with their addiction.

You can send them for treatment all you want, but nothing works until they want help.

quote:

---

Here's a crazy reality... You can't pass anything in Congress without some Democrat votes. AND the Senate is controlled by GOPe/uniparty/RINO never-Trumpers

---

Well, are tarrifs the answer or not? Use a little leadership and deal making to convince Dems and Never Trumpers to go along. Maybe Compromise here and there. That is how our government used to function. We have data points right now to judge whether these tarrifs are useful.

If tarrifs are some critical necessity, then nuke the filibuster to get them.

If Congress won't go along, then maybe our Country doesn't want these tarrifs. And that would be something to consider

Honestly, I think Trump should be doing both. Seek legislation, but also use existing legislation to do what he reasonably can.

But dont use the inefficiency of Congress to bypass the Constitution. Congressional inefficiency is a feature, not a bug.

He can arrest people, I guess, but they can still choose to use their pardon as a defense. Then a judge will decide if they are valid.

He got on Pat Hayden's last nerve.

They finished 2012 with a 7-6 record aftercstarting the seadon ranked #1 in both polls. They then opened the 2013 PAC season with ugly losses to Washington State and Arizona State. He was not allowed on the team bus after the ASU loss, but I'm not sure anyone ever explained why firing him became so urgent.

quote:

---

Ole Miss had a $10-15M roster last year when there was no rev share.

---

And failed to make the playoffs

quote:

---

NIL fund is kind of gone. Rev share now

---

Third party NIL is still the primary force. The Collectives were given the right to keep paying players to advertise for the Collectives. So, they can pay an athlete to, say, sign autographs at an alumni fund raiser, even though the funds are being raised for the Collective.

The limitation is the contracts have to be fair market value. I don't know what FMV for an autograph signing like above would be, but it probably isn't $500K. To spend the money on these athletes they have to organize a TON of marketing scenarios.