LawTalkingGuy

quote:

---

Here's a crazy reality... You can't pass anything in Congress without some Democrat votes. AND the Senate is controlled by GOPe/uniparty/RINO never-Trumpers

---

Well, are tarrifs the answer or not? Use a little leadership and deal making to convince Dems and Never Trumpers to go along. Maybe Compromise here and there. That is how our government used to function. We have data points right now to judge whether these tarrifs are useful.

If tarrifs are some critical necessity, then nuke the filibuster to get them.

If Congress won't go along, then maybe our Country doesn't want these tarrifs. And that would be something to consider

Honestly, I think Trump should be doing both. Seek legislation, but also use existing legislation to do what he reasonably can.

But dont use the inefficiency of Congress to bypass the Constitution. Congressional inefficiency is a feature, not a bug.

He can arrest people, I guess, but they can still choose to use their pardon as a defense. Then a judge will decide if they are valid.

He got on Pat Hayden's last nerve.

They finished 2012 with a 7-6 record aftercstarting the seadon ranked #1 in both polls. They then opened the 2013 PAC season with ugly losses to Washington State and Arizona State. He was not allowed on the team bus after the ASU loss, but I'm not sure anyone ever explained why firing him became so urgent.

quote:

---

Ole Miss had a $10-15M roster last year when there was no rev share.

---

And failed to make the playoffs

quote:

---

NIL fund is kind of gone. Rev share now

---

Third party NIL is still the primary force. The Collectives were given the right to keep paying players to advertise for the Collectives. So, they can pay an athlete to, say, sign autographs at an alumni fund raiser, even though the funds are being raised for the Collective.

The limitation is the contracts have to be fair market value. I don't know what FMV for an autograph signing like above would be, but it probably isn't $500K. To spend the money on these athletes they have to organize a TON of marketing scenarios.

quote:

---

Doubtful. With nil/portal you can bring in an all new roster. If it’s Kiffin he’s probably bringing on of his QB’s with him

---

This is what people seem to overlook. He can bring just about anyone he wants from UM with him.

If a coach, or university, wants to terminate a contract early, they can. If there is no provision for early termination then one party may be in breach of the contract. Breach of contract might sound bad, but legally anyone can choose to breach a contract.

If you do breach a contract, though, you have to make the other party financially whole. And the question becomes what is a fair value to pay when one party breaches an employment contract like this via early termination.

And that's where the buyout clauses come in. They are actually liquidated damages clauses. The parties are agreeing that the damages for early termination are hard to measure, and so they go ahead and state what each party has to pay.

You can't force someone to work for you if they don't want to. If a coaching contract has no buyout or early termination provision, the coach can still walk out and go coach somewhere else. But the school would then have to sue them and prove how they are financially damaged.

Some contracts can require specific performance, forcing the breaching party to go ahead and comply, but employment contracts like this would not fall into that category.

Now, a school could try to slip in a non-compete clause, attempting to prevent a coach from working at a rival school for a year....but I don't think it would be enforceable, and no coach would sign it anyway.

[quote]if I were Trump, I'd get it shoved thru congress now, so all his tariffs stay in placedetails.

He should have been doing this since "Liberation Day" announce the tariffs while simultaneously getting Congress to make them statutory. The bill could even allow POTUS the power to raise and lower tariffs based on negotiations with other countries.

Maybe we start at the top, and not have the government take an ownership interest in large corporations, or give large subsidies to businesses that are not profitable on their own?

quote:

---

I feel like IEEPA got really wonky when Congress got stripped of the legislative veto in 1983 which was the key to checking executive overreach

---

I'm pretty much a non-delegation guy, but all of these delegation statutes are now weird. Congress can delegate its power, but the only way to UNdelegate it is to pass a new statute, which has to be signed by POTUS.

If the issue became so.politically hot that you gotvs supermajority of Congress to agree, then they could override a veto, or even threaten impeachment, but that just seems unlikely in today's environment.