re: Republicans Fail to See the Biggest Issue Costing them Undecided Voters

quote:

---

quote:
so muh drumpf banned all abortions? really? link?


educate the dumbass women in your life.

you are a LOSER AND FAILURE




crickets.

OP is a cuck

---

i see you are online. come on out and stop hiding like a coward after spewing such worthless verbal diarrhea. come on. man up. can't do it can ya?

quote:

---

I will agree that thought has to be put into it, but all the thought is for the tiny minority of exceptional situations.

---

We talking about this in the context of voters concerns particularly women and that 2-3 percent out of 1,026,690 (abortion in 2023) is still tens of thousand of cases per year that are exceptional situations. The fear of pregnancy going sideways is of course very real for a lot women. Democrats are stoking that fear and loud voiced dumb arse conservatives that want bare min exceptions where a women has to be near death for doctors to be allowed to do anything arent helping the matter.

quote:

---

Until it's generally agreed that the other 98.5% of cases are clear-cut, the Republican dog hasn't caught anything yet IMO. Or nothing worth much, anyway.

---

Republicans and all voters have to reckon with this issue and its not as easy, even among Republicans, as many thought it would be, Thats the car imo.

quote:

---

obbs/Row v Wade is nothing more than the rectification of bad activist SCOTUS law that never should have happened in the first place and should have been overturned a long time ago.

---

Im coming around to agree with this.

There are no undecided voters in this election. These three women you know are educated morons.

You're trying to quantify a bunch of overly emotional stupid people. It will not work.

We are fricked becuase stupid people get to vote. That's the problem.

If Harris wins based on abortion it will be because prolifers cannot or will not see that they should be participating in a state-based solution to the issue, rather than insisting on a national abortion ban.

The Pro-Lifer’s failure to take this approach and undermine Trump’s attempts to make this a state-by-state issue - will simultaneously sink the pro-life movement and hand an avowed baby killer the ability to stack the Supreme Court and execute babies in the birth canal.

It’s endlessly infuriating that they cannot find a political solution to this problem that respects BOTH federalism and their policy goals. The pro-lifers (and I’m talking about the professional ones - who blog and raise money, etc.) are no different that the professional LGBs that added the Ts and went batshit after they no longer had the gay marriage quest.

If they want to start testing shite in the courts, perhaps they could try finding a dad whose baby was aborted without his consent and suing the mother or the hospital for wrongful death. Or just suing the state for due process violations on behalf of his unborn child.

There is more than one way to do things. And there is more than one way to look at an issue.

When it comes right down to it- the question of abortion is a nuanced question that can only be resolved in our hearts and minds, and if you want to talk about regulations on the issue- they have to be clearly defined with exceptions.

There is not even an absolute ban against killing an out of the womb human. See: Kyle Rittenhouse and other self defense cases, the death penalty, diminished capacity / insanity defense.

There’s no reason there can’t be legalized exceptions to what is ordinarily considered an abhorrent practice - ex 1) duration of pregnancy; 2) rape/incest; 3) life of mother.

It is not that any federal politician is saying any US citizen cannot have an abortion, it’s that the Constitution does not have anything to say about abortion so our limited federal government cannot make any law about it and the issue is reserved to the several states under the 10th Amendment.

I'm late to the thread and maybe someone already pointed this out, but women are all about bodily autonomy right? This is their big issue. Not the complete destruction of the economy and paying crazy prices for everything, it's bodily autonomy. My question is where is this bodily autonomy with the dude's dick? They want to be able to dissect a baby in their stomach, but they can't say listen buddy don't let it rip all up in me? Is it that hard to say "pull out"? I think I know the answer but I probably shouldn't say it

Many here fail to see my original point.

Why would these voters, educated Americans who contribute to our society in more ways than most, want an older white man to have the power to make a decision about their reproductive choices?

An abortion is a deeply moral, private, and difficult decision.

When it becomes a matter of public discussion, state coercion, and pompous philosophizing from those who will never have to make the choice, it diminishes the moral autonomy of these women.

That’s why they will turn the election over to Harris.

quote:

---

The number one issue that keeps them from fully embracing the GOP is their immovable stance on abortion

---

Tell them to enjoy not being able to afford groceries and a rise in criminal activity around their suburbs. If Pedro has his way with one of them, they fricking voted for it.

Only in modern America can we contort “hey let’s as a society decide not to allow the barbaric and regressive act of extinguishing human life for our own comfort” into the pompous and evil position