- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:57 am to tarzana
quote:
But honestly at this point in time anything which stifles MAGA in a win for America,
So cheating is acceptable?
You goose-steppers are all the same.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:57 am to Eurocat
quote:
In a world where a huge number of people vote mail in and those votes are counted after election day.
But why is she getting more votes than Bass? That can't be explained.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:00 am to Eurocat
Dude allowing mail in ballots AFTER Election Day is always going to cause issues with fraud.
It essentially allows people to know the result on Election Day and then figure out how many more votes they need to make up the difference.
Also post-election day mail in ballots having a HUGE swing from Bass to the other Dem knowing the 3rd place candidate was trailing by a significant margin is HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS.
It essentially allows people to know the result on Election Day and then figure out how many more votes they need to make up the difference.
Also post-election day mail in ballots having a HUGE swing from Bass to the other Dem knowing the 3rd place candidate was trailing by a significant margin is HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:01 am to Eurocat
Save your BS.........................it's a Cali vote and we all know it's rigged.
Mail in ballots are a rigged system, I'm shocked the jackass Dems got it done so quickly compared to the normal slowness they show mentally.
Mail in ballots are a rigged system, I'm shocked the jackass Dems got it done so quickly compared to the normal slowness they show mentally.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:12 am to Eurocat
quote:
Leaving mostly Democrats the vast majority of those voting mail in.
Lol, what an idiot. The third place candidate just magically started outpacing the first place candidate by a large margin. Not sure I have ever seen that done in my lifetime…
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:29 am to G2160
George Wallace got over ruled
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:02 am to Trevaylin
straight up fraud
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:04 am to tarzana
quote:
But honestly at this point in time anything which stifles MAGA in a win for America, even if the process appears at times troubled.
This is just childish and shallow thinking
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:07 am to Eurocat
you're part of the problem not part of the solution
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:12 am to jammajin
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:14 am to L.A.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:14 am to L.A.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:16 am to Eurocat
You're a complete retard because Karen Bass has received essentially 0 mail in ballots. If she's the top candidate that's even more of a statistical anomaly. She technically should be closer to 35% of the votes if the ballots were actually organic.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:24 am to L.A.
They even tried with Hillary but came up short. God only knows how but thank you Lord.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:25 am to L.A.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:27 am to STEVED00
"It essentially allows people to know the result on Election Day and then figure out how many more votes they need to make up the difference."
But that does not matter because the ballots had to be in the mail and postmarked by election day. It can't be like two days after, oh no we need 50,000 votes go manufacture them. Now if you want to say they were manufactured before and sent by mail.....different argument.
But that does not matter because the ballots had to be in the mail and postmarked by election day. It can't be like two days after, oh no we need 50,000 votes go manufacture them. Now if you want to say they were manufactured before and sent by mail.....different argument.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:30 am to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
But why is she getting more votes than Bass? That can't be explained.
Bass is more popular with the older demographic, whom tends to show up and vote in person.
For all those saying Raman is an unknown, you know nothing of local politics. The city was re-districted a few years back and she’s won a council seat in multiple districts. Her last election didn’t even go to a runoff, she won with a majority of the vote.
She’s the most prominent progressive politician in a city that’s deep blue.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:38 am to Placekicker
quote:
In what world does the third place candidate get more mail in votes than the first two place candidates AFTER Election Day?
apparently unsolicited ballots are freely mailed to every registered voter. Getting registered in California is very easy, same day, and can be done without ID. Voter rolls have never been purged. Mail in votes are accepted (legally) 7 days after the election. Apparently no post mark required as they still have drop boxes.
this sets up a condition under which operatives KNOW how many votes they need to dispel the Republican candidate and the means by which to legally do so. It is a dirty rotten system, but it is why Democrats are screaming that there is no proof of fraud because what they are doing is legal under the current system in California.
I could be wrong, but this is my understanding.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:44 am to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
this sets up a condition under which operatives KNOW how many votes they need to dispel the Republican candidate and the means by which to legally do so. It is a dirty rotten system, but it is why Democrats are screaming that there is no proof of fraud because what they are doing is legal under the current system in California.
I think you’re absolutely spot on. But, isn’t filling out ballots for someone else, paying someone to fill it out a certain way illegal itself?
They see what the deficit it is on Election Day. They then go about filling out the necessary number of ballots under the names of the homeless, those who did not vote, or the deceased. That has got to be illegal.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News