re: Raman getting 40% of the 6/6 ballot drop is statistically IMPOSSIBLE. Not just improbable

quote:

---

But that does not matter because the ballots had to be in the mail and postmarked by election day. It can't be like two days after, oh no we need 50,000 votes go manufacture them.

---

Drop Boxes: Because these ballots bypass the post office, the "postmarked by Election Day" rule for mailed ballots does not apply. There is no way to prove when a vote was deposited in a drop box. If they have 7 days to count, just keep emptying the drop boxes. If the drop boxes are empty, keep filling them up.

Do you guys even understand that Bass’ preferred opponent in the general is Pratt, not Raman?

Bass is the DNC candidate and faces a much more formidable opponent in Raman than Pratt.

Who "with a brain" would vote for this moron for anything:

L.A. Councilwoman Blames Toyota for Catalytic-Converter Theft, Opposes Motion Targeting Thieves

Rather than vote in favor of a motion banning the unlawful possession of catalytic converters — a valuable automotive part — Nithya Raman, a Los Angeles councilwoman, voted against the measure and blamed car manufacturers for making the part too easy to steal.

"In this case, I think one of the things that infuriates me, is that we have a company — whatever, Toyota — who makes the Prius, that essentially has a device on their cars which is super easy to remove. It's basically the value of a MacBook, right?" the Democratic lawmaker said.

quote:

---

apparently unsolicited ballots are freely mailed to every registered voter.

---

A feature, not a bug.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

What’s happening in California is nothing new. It’s the same playbook they used to steal 2020.

First they send out mass mail-in ballots, to everyone, even those who didn’t request them, and dead people still on the voter rolls.

Then they harvest all these floating ballots.

Then they delay counting for day/weeks, in deep blue counties they control, so they can continue to ship all these fraudulent mail-in ballots to the tabulation center, until they have enough to steal the election.

And that’s how it’s done. Completely untraceable election fraud.

This is why the Dems don’t want voter ID. It’s why they don’t want paper ballots. It’s why they don’t want same-day elections. It’s why they don’t want to clean up voter rolls.

This is how just a few deep blue counties in swing states, are able to overturn entire state and federal elections.

This is why securing elections is so important, whether that be via the SAVE America Act, or some sort of executive action. Until this problem is solved, we do not have a nation.

---

quote:

---

what the machine wants is 2 libtards

---

No, the machine wants an easy Bass win without spending any money. Bass has all the major endorsements.

The machine doesn’t have to do anything, or spend any money, for her to win the runoff against Pratt.

The DNC will need to spend money to back Bass against Raman. It’s the same reason they don’t want a dem v dem matchup for the governor race. They want becerra v Hilton.

Your opinion is there is no election fraud to ensure an outcome because it wouldn't help the people committing the fraud?

quote:

---

Your opinion is there is no election fraud to ensure an outcome because it wouldn't help the people committing the fraud?

---

Who’s committing the fraud? Identify them.

Bass is the candidate with all the major endorsements and has the most financial backing. If the machine wants bass to win, they want her to go up against the easiest candidate in the general.

In deep blue LA, Pratt would be the easiest candidate.

quote:

---

Who’s committing the fraud? Identify them.

---

The city of LA, the state of California, the DNC.

Your argument is not logical. You're admitting that fraud is an option, but in this case annunused one, because they can control this election but not the runoff? Is Pratt easier to control than another Dem?

And this is all still irrelevant. The math tells you there is fraud with 100% certainty. So you're not only chasing a red herring, you're just absolutely wrong to a mathematical certainty.

You continue to prove you are a dumbass

quote:

---

Thomas Massie garnered something like 75% of the under 40 vote against gallrein, yet still lost the election because that age demographic doesn’t get to the polls and vote.

---

Please point to the part of the evening after polls closed where Massie was up 75%.... I'll hangup and listen.