Started By
Message

re: Raman getting 40% of the 6/6 ballot drop is statistically IMPOSSIBLE. Not just improbable

Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:11 am to
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13910 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:11 am to
quote:

I don't have a dog in this fight. It's California, and California voters will determine the outcome of their elections. But honestly at this point in time anything which stifles MAGA in a win for America, even if the process appears at times troubled.


So, it’s ok if they cheat the will of the People, so long as it stifles MAGA.

You’re ok with the Dem mafia rigging the game to get the outcome they want, one that will keep that once beautiful city as a hellhole, so long as it stifles MAGA.

The People spoke on Election Day. They voted for Pratt. What has followed since is a series of mathematically impossible events to get the second Dem over the top.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 7:16 am
Posted by Lutcher Lad
South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Member since Sep 2009
7673 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:21 am to
They're gonna cheat right before our eyes, and seems like we can't do a damn thing about it! Gavin NewScum told us before the election that he had a backup plan...this was it!
frick A DEMOCRAT!
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12882 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

The problem is not her getting more mail in votes than Pratt. The problem is how is she outpacing Karen Bass.


A good image to compare would be to watch the end of Disney’s The Incredibles. The son Dash has the ability to beat anyone in a footrace with superhero speed but the parents dont want people to know. So they get him to catch up juuuuust enough to win but not reveal the “cheating”. This is what happened with mail in ballots. They outpaced Bass and overtook Pratt but in doing so revealed their cheat. Like 2020 81 million when prior and more polarizing elections garnered 67-ish million
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
6423 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

They can’t let Pratt win and come in and make things better, or look at the books, they were cheating for their lives




"Every election I don't like the result to was cheating"

Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
72108 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:25 am to
Elections are not based on reality of facts.

The facts allowed are not real.

There are many Eurocrats out there.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 8:41 am
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36145 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:35 am to
quote:

don't have a dog in this fight. It's California, and California voters will determine the outcome of their elections. But honestly at this point in time anything which stifles MAGA in a win for America, even if the process appears at times troubled.


When your only principle is power.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98652 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:37 am to
You are watching it in real time. Yet your iq is so low you will make that comment
Posted by sabbertooth
A Distant Planet
Member since Sep 2006
6190 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:38 am to
I dont think anyone is the least bit surprised by this. The sheer audacity and arrogance of doing it in such a brazen manner is astounding.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23985 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:40 am to
quote:

He has said that referencing every election. And then he hems and haws and bends himself into a pretzel when it is pointed out that he votes mail in too


You humiliate yourself when making your ridiculous rationalizations.....
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
4071 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:03 am to
quote:

When your only principle is power.


Keep in mind that poster calls the group he is opposed to "fascists", yet simultaneously promotes it so he can "win".
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15252 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The problem is not her getting more mail in votes than Pratt. The problem is how is she outpacing Karen Bass.


Thomas Massie garnered something like 75% of the under 40 vote against gallrein, yet still lost the election because that age demographic doesn’t get to the polls and vote.

In California, where everyone gets a mail in ballot and can vote from their couch, that age demographic votes a lot more than they do elsewhere. The progressive Raman is incredibly popular with young folks in LA.

Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
20413 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:07 am to
Why don't Republicans learn to cheat more efficiently like the Dems? That would solve a lot of their problems.

They should have a team of pollsters writing up, back dating and filling in Pratt's name on ballots as we speak.

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42710 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:10 am to
quote:

It's that simple. The samle is not "neutral".



Boon
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46397 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:13 am to
What I learned in this thread is that Eurocat is either an idiot that doesn't understand probability and statistics, or understands them just fine and ignores them because it fits his political narrative.

So which is it Eurocat? Are you a fricking idiot, or just a hypocritical piece of shite?
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7898 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:17 am to
What is the postmark date on these mail in ballots?

Do these mail in ballots even have a postmark?
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6618 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:

So tell us, which one is it?


Hes both. Reatarded works as well
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
56012 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

the odds that a random new batch lands at 40%

There is your error. Batches of votes are rarely random. If they come from an area in which the candidate is strong we would expect that candidate to outperform the rest of the results.

I point this out simply to refute that statistical logic. It is just not valid because the odds are that the batches are not random. However, it’s likely that the randomness does not favor the third place candidate.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52324 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

I ASKED CHATGPT -
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30341 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

For God's sakes, it's NOT impossible and NOT complicated.

TRUMP TOLD REPUBLICANS NOT TO USE MAIL IN -

LINK

So many Republicans listened and said, if that is important for Trump, then I shall do as he says!

Leaving mostly Democrats the vast majority of those voting mail in.

The analysis above makes it seem like mails ins are "average electorate" when they are not, they are biased towards "mail in on behalf of Democrats (because Republicans were told not to)".

It's that simple. The samle is not "neutral".

You really are a stupid person.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram