Started By
Message

re: Population growth in the US is becoming stagnant. Should we ban hormonal birth control?

Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41619 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

In my opinion this is a net positive. Have you seen half the population today? They are retarded, autistic, blue hair freaks.


Donald Trump just won the popular vote in a national election as a republican. First time that’s happened in 20 years.


Also where the hell do you live that that’s half of what you see?

That group represents less than 1% of people I see on a daily basis.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 5:41 pm
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5227 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Donald Trump just won the popular vote in a national election as a republican. First time that’s happened in 20 years.


Not sure what that means. But so far I’m unconvinced that lower birth rates are a problem.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10606 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:41 pm to
quote:


Great idea if you want to lose every election


Repeal the 19th Amendment. Problem solved.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41619 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Not sure what that means. But so far I’m unconvinced that lower birth rates are a problem.


Can’t fix stupid.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 5:45 pm
Posted by RebRxV
Member since Oct 2022
625 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:45 pm to
It's Cyndi Lauper's fault. She convinced everyone that "girls just wanna have fun," and having and raising kids is not always fun.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124131 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:46 pm to
Educated people over babied their children to the point of millions of young adults having major Peter Pan syndrome. I’ve worked with young attorneys that are scared to talk to people on the phone. It’s embarrassing.
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5227 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Can’t fix stupid.


Your arguments have lost to the pro low birth rate arguments. I’m sorry your argument doesn’t hold more merit.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69321 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:54 pm to
Some married couples actually make a reasoned decision not to have children. They prefer to avoid the financial burden, and they want the freedom to pursue busy careers or travel and do other things that would be much more difficult with the added responsibility of raising children. You may not agree with their choice, but everyone is different, and, so far, it’s a free country…
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 5:56 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56349 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:55 pm to
quote:


Population decline is fortuitously occurring at the same time that automation is projected to astronomically advance. Sounds like a good thing to me.



You make a great point. Makes a person wonder what will society look like when upwards of 20-30% of current jobs are being performed by AI, automation and robotics in the next 10-15 years? Hell, it could be more than 20-30% in the next 10-15 years.
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
2052 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:25 pm to
I can hear the howls of outrage.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70914 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Some married couples actually make a reasoned decision not to have children. They prefer to avoid the financial burden, and they want the freedom to pursue busy careers or travel and do other things that would be much more difficult with the added responsibility of raising children. You may not agree with their choice, but everyone is different, and, so far, it’s a free country…


I believe fewer couples would make that choice if it weren’t so punishing financially or as taxing on their time. Those couples are making a rational economic decision. My goal would be to introduce reforms that change the economic calculus so that decision becomes less rational for more couples. I want this done via carrot, not stick.
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Some married couples actually make a reasoned decision not to have children. They prefer to avoid the financial burden, and they want the freedom to pursue busy careers or travel and do other things that would be much more difficult with the added responsibility of raising children. You may not agree with their choice, but everyone is different, and, so far, it’s a free country…


It’s a selfish and empty life
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

I still don’t understand how a declining population is a problem. I’m open to suggestions, but nobody has ever been able to sufficiently explain why it’s a problem.


Sure they have.

It's real easy.

Do you want the government to collapse in about 25 years for gross failure to fund it? Led by SS/Medicare?
Posted by SaintInBham
Birmingham
Member since Sep 2015
1186 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:54 pm to
Start with making life more affordable.
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Start with making life more affordable.


Put a majority of women in homemaking roles and this will naturally happen
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
13102 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:57 pm to
We will thrive with lower populations as AI and robotics take over more aspects of society.
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15548 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Put a majority of women in homemaking roles and this will naturally happen



backwards, nowadays unless the man has a really good job paying job (or a woman on welfare with 20+ kids with no daddy), life is too expensive in places with the most jobs to have this happen (among other non-economic related issues).

I had my wife do stay at home for three years, then it became too much after about a year into the second kid

It also helps if you have good family support around where the jobs are.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

We will thrive with lower populations as AI and robotics take over more aspects of society.


No we won’t. Human society has gone through massive paradigm shifts before. The agricultural revolution, Industrial Revolution, electronic revolution. We’ve always evolved through it and need to to increase population to serve the economy and society
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

backwards, nowadays unless the man has a really good job paying job (or a woman on welfare with 20+ kids with no daddy), life is too expensive in places with the most jobs to have this happen (among other non-economic related issues). I had my wife do stay at home for three years, then it became too much after about a year into the second kid It also helps if you have good family support around where the jobs are.


Stop thinking 5 or 10 years or even a generation ahead. Think several generations
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Start with making life more affordable.


Sure.

You can live in a 1300 square foot house, rent until you are in your late 30s while you save up to buy, stop with the unnecessary purchases, streaming services, eating out/ordering in, buy used cars cash, forget about ridiculous things like travel ball for your kids, limit vacations to every few years, etc., etc., etc.

Viola! Just as affordable as the 70s.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram