Started By
Message

re: Population growth in the US is becoming stagnant. Should we ban hormonal birth control?

Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:03 pm to
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15548 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Stop thinking 5 or 10 years or even a generation ahead. Think several generations



would be a whole lot cooler if people nowadays could envision a future with how things are going
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15548 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Sure.

You can live in a 1300 square foot house, rent until you are in your late 30s while you save up to buy, stop with the unnecessary purchases, streaming services, eating out/ordering in, buy used cars cash, forget about ridiculous things like travel ball for your kids, limit vacations to every few years, etc., etc., etc.

Viola! Just as affordable as the 70s.


yeah, it's called survival mode and it sucks...especially if you don't have any parents left (or older generation) because they've all died and the ones that do remain live far away in places you can't get jobs

Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22981 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Sure they have.

It's real easy.

Do you want the government to collapse in about 25 years for gross failure to fund it? Led by SS/Medicare?

I think he poses a good question. When discussing population decline or stabilization - there is a near absolute focus on impacts to the SS and Medicare programs, but there's a shitload more economic manifestations to population decline or stabilization, and some are massive and positive. To truly answer his question, the complete picture would have to be considered.
Posted by cornerstore
Member since Jul 2024
2163 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:38 pm to
Why do I give a shite if there’s less people in my country to enjoy it’s incredible but limited natural wealth
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
47297 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:46 pm to
We should ban abortion and incentivize married couples to have children.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

yeah, it's called survival mode and it sucks


No, that's how my family and most every family we knew lived in the 70s.

We didn't think it sucked. We just thought it was life.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

When discussing population decline or stabilization - there is a near absolute focus on impacts to the SS and Medicare programs



Which means that his statement that no one can answer his question is asinine.

I'll be happy to look at a list of pros if someone wants to post them, but the cons are well known.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90989 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

What do you think this country looks like when there are a shite load of expensive, old and unproductive people and very very few young people who are innovating and producing?


The AI bots bringing granny dinner.



Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103515 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:01 pm to
I’m ok with the population not growing
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15548 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

No, that's how my family and most every family we knew lived in the 70s.

We didn't think it sucked. We just thought it was life.


Chances of families like that even existing in the future given the culture change and lack of kids, etc. have diminished rapidly.

Good luck getting the culture back in line like the 70s that cats been out that bag
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18872 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:01 pm to
Sadly, I think the majority of birth rates from Americans are from white trash people and ghetto people. People who depend 100% on the government to take care of their kids.. so they will have 6+ kids with no worries.


Need to get the financially responsible people to let loose and have more kids. Those are the ones i wouldn't mind my tax dollars helping out if they have more kids and need assistance.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103515 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

still don’t understand how a declining population is a problem. I’m open to suggestions, but nobody has ever been able to sufficiently explain why it’s a problem.


Traditionally it leads to stagnant economies as populations age and productivity declines along with consumption.

But with AI improving it might be preferable. AI will take many jobs, so productivity can remain high with smaller workforce. Which leads to higher wages for the jobs AI can’t do. Surplus of product made with lower overhead means competitive exports. More wealth in US divided among a smaller population so consumption will remain high with a very high quality of life
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15548 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

We should ban abortion and incentivize married couples to have children.


Yep. On top of that, re-teaching the people that marriage is about being fruitful and oriented toward God.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
22247 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:17 pm to
quote:


I still don’t understand how a declining population is a problem.


It's not a problem! As I watch more and more apartments being built around my area, I wish we would have more women on birth control, especially the ghetto trash that should be on mandatory birth control!!
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3571 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Society forgot about the most important role women are supposed to play. We never learn.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28166 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Should we ban hormonal birth control?

you think birth control is the main reason for declining population growth?

bruh...

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Chances of families like that even existing in the future given the culture change and lack of kids, etc. have diminished rapidly.

Good luck getting the culture back in line like the 70s that cats been out that bag


Oh, I don't care if culture goes back to that or not.

I just want the whiners to admit that it's the culture and their choices and not "affordability" that is the problem.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14567 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

It's not a problem!


It is if you want SS and Medicare to survive and for the US to remain the largest and strongest economy in the world.

If you don't care about those things then it probably isn't.
Posted by TheMagicMan
Member since May 2026
141 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:14 am to
quote:

I still don’t understand how a declining population is a problem. I’m open to suggestions, but nobody has ever been able to sufficiently explain why it’s a problem. Especially if you factor in that libtards aren’t reproducing.


You'll get down voted but you're absolutely right. The U.S. population was just under 250 million people in 1990. The current U.S. population is just under 350 million people. Never mind the illegal immigrant population of around 20 million.

That's 100 million people more than 36 years ago, that isn't even remotely sustainable.

I don't want significant population decline, but I vehemently reject this whole "the U.S. population must continue to grow" argument. We don't have the resources to keep growing.

Over the next 25 years I would like to see a small but significant population decrease. We need to get back to being around or just under 300 million people. You still have a massive and robust country at that point, but you aren't pushing everything (infrastructure, medical, social services, schools, logistics) to their breaking point like we are now.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 12:15 am
Posted by TheMagicMan
Member since May 2026
141 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:16 am to
quote:

It is if you want SS and Medicare to survive and for the US to remain the largest and strongest economy in the world.

If you don't care about those things then it probably isn't.


Honestly, as long as we have a stable economy and good quality of life, I don't really care about having the largest and strongest economy in the world. Having that gets you where we are now.

Immigrants coming in here illegally by the millions during Biden. And it will happen again under the next Democrat President. It's cultural su*cide.

So if preserving our national culture and not importing the third world means not having the largest and strongest economy in the world, as long as it's still really good I'm okay with losing that title and you should be as well.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 12:19 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram