- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:33 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
"Secret" ( ) assessments say Iran has operational access to 30 of its 33 missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz. So they've cleared enough rubble from the road to enable them to get to their bombed sites.
I had to chuckle as well NC. Some on this board have access to operational refrigerators in their front yard covered in Kudzu as well.
Some would willingly let a nuke fall on the heads of their children if it made OMB.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:35 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
They’re saying you, and every other American who supports this campaign is fricking retarded, which is very hard to argue
Well, this is obviously false.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:37 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Is it wrong?
Almost certainly. I'm no maritime insurance expert but exclusions (like don't venture into a war zone) are written into every policy. It's no different than your boat insurance having a "named storm" exclusion.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:39 am to Flats
quote:So you know as much as I do then... My point is that the Iranians are the ones that are causing the issue.
Almost certainly. I'm no maritime insurance expert
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:40 am to joshnorris14
quote:
NYT
So it is OK to believe the Failing NYT now?
From April 7th:
quote:
President Donald Trump called out the "failing" New York Times for "running on past fumes" during a Monday press conference at the White House.
"Failing, failing!" Trump said. "Circulation way down at the New York Times. What’s going on with that?"
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:08 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Iran has regained access to most of its missile sites, launchers and underground facilities.
Gaining access does not mean they are operational and that they have any missiles to fire
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:09 am to RollTide4547
quote:
It's not like there is a gate there that's locked. The reason it's "closed" is that the insurance companies have threatened the ship owners that they won't pay if something happens. The insurance companies and owners have cowered to the threats by Iran, not the US.
Ok, so like I said, it’s closed.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:34 am to joshnorris14
When I want reliable truthful news with no agenda, I trust the New York Times.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:39 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Whine and cry some more panican.
Ok, so like I said, it’s closed
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:55 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
lol the NYT? Have we not learned that every single word they type is a lie. I’m thrilled it means Iran has nothing
It must be amazing to live in a world where you can just dismiss information out of hand if you don't like where it's coming from.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:58 am to RollTide4547
quote:
My point is that the Iranians are the ones that are causing the issue.
This is what you said:
quote:
The insurance companies and owners have cowered to the threats by Iran,
They're not "cowering to threats", they're executing standard business practices. It doesn't matter if the war is our fault, Iran's fault, nobody's fault, they're not going to underwrite ships going through a war zone.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:59 am to joshnorris14
quote:So it's 100% bullshite. Thanks.
U.S. intelligence agencies are telling policymakers behind closed doors
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:00 am to joshnorris14
quote:
We need to understand that we have killed anyone that was inclined to negotiate and had the power negotiate and have left people that have either witnessed the negotiators be killed and learned not to negotiate, or that are starting from a point where they want a conflict.
It’s been 47 years. Who do you think was inclined to negotiate?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:04 am to udtiger
quote:
cough Mark Kelly cough
From the questioning in the oversight meeting yesterday, my money is on that dirtbag senator, Chris Murphy.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:06 am to TidenUP
or its 100% bullshite. Or even purposely leaked to see who is talking the the press. Or it is true. Since I believe none of them, I guess I have to pick what I wish to be true. 
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:07 am to Flats
quote:Caused by Iran.
They're not "cowering to threats", they're executing standard business practices
quote:Ok. Point is Iran is causing it. Iran was trying to get a nuclear weapon, which caused the fight in the first place.
It doesn't matter if the war is our fault, Iran's fault, nobody's fault, they're not going to underwrite ships going through a war zone.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:12 am to Lg
quote:
From the questioning in the oversight meeting yesterday, my money is on that dirtbag senator, Chris Murphy
Wouldn't be a bit surprised
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:14 am to joshnorris14
quote:
We need to invade.
No. The United States military has hundreds of unmanned drones that can orbit continuously over enemy turf and pop them off one at a time. We just need a cheaper way to do so is all.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:14 am to DeBoar
quote:
Wasn’t there a thread the other day about Brennan saying they still have people imbedded in the agencies?
DataRepublican has gone into an even deeper dive concerning that...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Soros-linked donors have built a “plug-and-play” network of national security professionals that can be inserted into key government positions almost overnight when Democrats regain the White House. When out of power, the same group forms part of the organized resistance.
This is why the Biden administration often felt like Obama 2.0. Within hours of Biden taking office, veterans from this network filled many of the most important national security roles. Congress confirmed the majority of them with little to no resistance. It wasn’t Obama 2.0, it was the National Security Action network picking up right where it left off, without missing a beat.
@DataRepublican did the deep research. In this series, I will show you why it matters from an operational perspective: how the network functions, what its strengths and weaknesses are, and how it can be countered
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 10:15 am
Popular
Back to top


1











