- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Alabama  |
| Location: | Hayden, Alabama |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 8375 |
| Registered on: | 7/18/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: LSU choosing between Saban and Kiffin
Posted by Lg on 11/12/25 at 9:28 am to MrMojoRisin
quote:
LSU was given a number on Nick Saban from Sexton. They didn’t say no.
If this was true, why wouldn't LSU give him a lifetime contract without the possibility of being fired? It's really strange that some LSU fans only want him to coach 3-4 years and then turn it over to an up and comer.
0
quote:
So yeah I think he’s considering coming back for 3 or 4 years to fix the culture and show how to deal with the NIL
That's kind of a strange take. He doesn't like retirement NOW, but in 3-4 years he'll love it. If he was really interested in it, LSU would offer him a LIFETIME contract without the possibility of being fired and he walks away when he wants too.
quote:
What happens if the SCOTUS knocks down the tariffs and they have to be paid back to other countries?
I thought tariffs were TAXES we pay? Somebody needs to get this shite straight. Trump can't use tariffs to regulate international trade because muh taxes and Congress can only do taxes. So if the American taxpayer is paying the tariffs what countries would the President have to pay back.
re: Just talked to Nick he’s in..
Posted by Lg on 11/10/25 at 8:26 am to RazorBroncs
quote:
Saban has been confirmed to be heavily involved in coaching openings at other programs right now in an advisory role. He met with some boosters and board members to advise on the Arkansas opening a couple weeks ago.
This is something he regularly does and has done for multiple programs this year and in previous years
Do you have a link for this? I just find that a little strange that a former coach still employed by the University of Alabama would be advising other universities on who to hire as HC, especially other SEC schools. Seems like a conflict of interest doesn't it? Somebody is feeding y'all a line of BS sounds like to me.
quote:
If you don't go after the people giving her the orders what did you really solve though?
I think we know why Pelosi is not seeking another term now.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/7/25 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So a sales tax isn't a tax?
Who pays a sales tax and who pays a tariff?
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 2:25 pm to JimEverett
quote:
You get what is happening now
Thanks, Jim. I appreciate the discussion.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 2:07 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The tax issues is relevant to what the power to regulate encompasses.
But without specifically defining what "regulate" means, then what is the Executive supposed to think?
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 2:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The executive is only given authority that Congress approves of. It all starts with Congress and the executive is bound to the text congress authors
So Congress gives the Executive the authority to "regulate" international trade but binds the Executive in how it deems to do that.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Also, the "tax" issue is getting into the weeds.
You can't really say this with the argument Jim Everett has proposed. A tariff is either a "tax" or it isn't.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 1:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Specifically authorized by Congress.
So Congress has always been the body administering tariffs?
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 1:38 pm to JimEverett
quote:
the power to tariff at all.
But if a tariff is considered a tax, then why do they even exist? And who would actually have the authority to use the tariff, if not the President?
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 1:23 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The power to REGULATE does not include the power to TARIFF.
But a tariff is used to regulate. And Congress passed the IEEPA giving the President the Authority to regulate. So, in reality, Congress would need to go back and amend the IEEPA and remove the tariff as an option to regulate commerce.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 1:13 pm to JimEverett
quote:
So, if a tariff is a type of tax then the Administration's argument fails.
So, all tariffs should be deemed unconstitutional if they are considered a tax.
re: DEMANDS Dem Socialists of America Just Handed Mamdani
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 12:52 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Etc etc
White liberal women ordered to wear a niqab and told to keep their mouths shut when men are talking. Can't wait.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 12:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nope, it wasnt.
Good gosh!! How stupid can one person be.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 12:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This is the retarded part.
You probably think the wide open border wasn't a national emergency either, right? Talk about retarded.
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 12:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This is the retarded part.
Nothing like cheap Chinese goods at the behest of the American worker, right Roger?
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted by Lg on 11/6/25 at 12:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's what authority flows after that emergency is declared that we are discussing.
I just gave it to you, but here it is once again.
quote:
a United States federal law authorizing the president to regulate international commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States.
So if tariffs are USED TO REGULATE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE then this gives the President the authority to use it at his discretion if he determines, say a trade imbalance, a national emergency.
Popular
81
