Started By
Message

re: MPD policy allows knee to the neck restraint. Wow!

Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:23 am to
Posted by chris911guy
Milton, FL
Member since Jan 2012
197 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:23 am to
Minneapolis PD seems to be too often in the conversation for abuses. In 2015 they were given recommendations from DOJ on ways to reform procedures and eliminate rogue or bad officers. Evidently these recommendations were largely ignored. One of the practices that were cautioned against by DOJ was the fact they used inconsistent "coaching" trouble employees in lieu of discipline and corrective action, which resulted in retention of problem employees.

Story

Edited to add link.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 10:39 am
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:24 am to
quote:

MPD policy allows knee to the neck restraint.



In other words. The cops dindu nuffin wrong.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s hollow dome
Member since Feb 2009
160924 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:24 am to
Remember when Minny last had a conservative Mayor to hire a conservative police chief?
Posted by BM7133
Raceland, LA
Member since Feb 2006
1199 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:24 am to
It is so hard to take people on this board's opinions on subjective topics when you remember the same people said Ronda Rousey can beat up most men, a grown man can't kill a bobcat with his bare hands, a gorilla would beat a bear in a fight etc etc.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
92514 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:24 am to
Mini is going to be fricked for a while.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130092 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:25 am to
quote:

If he had a heart attack, which is what it sounds like from what little we got from the ME


Nothing in the ME’s note in the probable cause statement can be taken to indicate he had a heart attack.

quote:

and his actions were the policy of the department.


His actions were not following the policy of the department. As I noted above, when a patient is subdued with prone restraint, MPD policy is to roll them onto their side as soon as possible. Because they can die.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148450 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:25 am to
so he followed policy

and the possibility the death was a coronary issue

man... people gonna be mad when all the officers, esp. Chauvin, sues the city & PD for improper dismissal... wins back pay and benefits and the chance to get his badge back (which hopefully he takes... in another jurisdiction)
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 10:26 am
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

so he followed policy

No he did not, read the entire policy posted on page 3.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 10:28 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
176922 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:


And it's extremely clear that the guy was offering no resistance to where that was necessary by the time they were on the ground in what is scene on the video (especially after he went unconscious).


One thing that a friend of mine brought up that was really obvious and not talked about much is if the guy was resisting and the officer had any concerns about him then why does he have his hands in his pockets? If I think someone is a threat to me the last place my hand will be is in my pocket.
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
8315 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

It also says in their policy it is only to be used briefly when a person is resisting. We have video proof that wasn’t happening.


From the policy manual:
quote:

Active Resistance: A response to police efforts to bring a person into custody or control for detainment or arrest. A subject engages in active resistance when engaging in physical actions (or verbal behavior reflecting an intention) to make it more difficult for officers to achieve actual physical control. (10/01/10) (04/16/12)

Once he decided he didn’t want to get in the car by their policy he was actively resisting. There doesn’t appear to be a clear definition of how long they can control him through force after the incident. They would obviously say they were controlling him until the ambulance arrived on scene. Which in most cases would seem logical.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
176922 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

They would obviously say they were controlling him until the ambulance arrived on scene. Which in most cases would seem logical.


Why was an ambulance called in the first place? He seemed to be healthy and walking around fine when he was first put in cuffs?
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:32 am to
These are the crimes that Chauvin has been charged with:

quote:

609.195 MURDER IN THE THIRD DEGREE.
(a) Whoever, without intent to effect the death of any person, causes the death of another by perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life, is guilty of murder in the third degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 25 years.

609.205 MANSLAUGHTER IN THE SECOND DEGREE.
A person who causes the death of another by any of the following means is guilty of manslaughter in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both:

(1) by the person's culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another;


The 3rd degree murder charge will be more difficult to prove because of the depraved mind standard, IMO, because the policy and other contributing causes of death. However, the prosecution will focus on the length of time he kept the knee on the neck, the fact he was restrained and that he ignored others requests to lay him on his side.

I think he's fricked on the manslaughter charge.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130092 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:33 am to
Apparently every cop on this board is going to check in with a “so he was following policy” post.

That sort of tone deaf response is absolutely part of the problem. Additionally, the fact that apparently no cop has received any training on prone restraint is a bit shocking.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s hollow dome
Member since Feb 2009
160924 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:33 am to
He didn’t have his hands in his pockets. He has on black gloves. There are multiple pictures from different angles that show him and the other officers wearing black gloves.

I don’t think you are lying on purpose.
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Once he decided he didn’t want to get in the car by their policy he was actively resisting. There doesn’t appear to be a clear definition of how long they can control him through force after the incident. They would obviously say they were controlling him until the ambulance arrived on scene. Which in most cases would seem logical.

There is a 10 minute long video of his murder of him saying, “I can’t breathe” and agreeing to get in the car but the cops wouldn’t let him up. No he was not and you’re a piece of shite.

I’m assuming you’re a scumbag cop because of your shitty “policy” argument. Always gotta stay behind that blue wall.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 10:40 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:


MPD policy allows knee to the neck restraint. Wow!
It is so hard to take people on this board's opinions on subjective topics when you remember the same people said Ronda Rousey can beat up most men, a grown man can't kill a bobcat with his bare hands, a gorilla would beat a bear in a fight etc etc.




ah, the nebulous "this board"

frick you
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130092 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

However, the prosecution will focus on the length of time he kept the knee on the neck, the fact he was restrained and that he ignored others requests to lay him on his side.


The second part is going to be the key.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23627 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:35 am to
quote:

quote:
was wrong based off what came from the ME.


The response was overly focused on the knee. The response that Floyd’s death was unnecessary and criminal was not wrong. It is appropriate.


The focus on the knee was the primary sensationalism used to get people upset. If the preliminary opinions on the knee are true it was not a direct strangulation it definitely changes the situation a good bit.

I am not disagreeing with you on the idea that the situation deserves intense scrutiny, criticism, and appropriate punishment. I disagree with the rioting and looting completely. I think national protesting is ridiculous as no one is disagreeing something needs to be done about this issue. I think local protesting is fair as that is their local elected government with the screw ups accountable for any broken system (outside of vandalism, arson, and looting).
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:35 am to
quote:

The second part is going to be the key.



I don't know how people can read the preliminary ME report and think Chauvin comes off looking good.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
13294 posts
Posted on 5/30/20 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Once he decided he didn’t want to get in the car by their policy he was actively resisting. 
Except the official report says Officer Chauvin pulled him back out of the car.

Officer Chauvin also dismissed Officers Lane's concerns for Mr. Floyd's health.

Officer Chauvin also continued to apply pressure to Mr. Floyd's neck even after he was completely limp and no pulse could be found.

These facts can't easily be dismissed. Especially considering the police policies that have been shared on here.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram