- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milei goes all in for the Falkland/Malvinas islands
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:35 am to CastleBravo
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:35 am to CastleBravo
quote:
The people that live there now are ethnically from the british isles. Of course they want to stay with the UK.
Ethnically, I am English. The UK can suck my American wiener.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 4:02 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Wait until the UK sends their ship to threaten Milei. If it is no longer in dry dock.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 4:15 am to Bobby OG Johnson
There’s a reason American billionaires are buying property/housing in Argentina. They see it as an eventual safe haven for when our country is overrun by Illegal Immigrants and our society is destroyed by ‘diversity’. Argentina has none of and wants none of that. They value their own culture and people and are willing to only accept those who can pay their own way.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:21 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
I’m not sure how England justifies their claim on these islands or why they even want to continue holding them.
Okay, but Puerto Rico? And at one time Hawaii?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:58 am to B747Tiger
Argentina is trying to grow, I can’t say that about uk
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:49 am to Bobby OG Johnson
People are British and overwhelmingly voted to remain British. Government sucks right now but it should stay British.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:07 am to Bobby OG Johnson
More aggressive expansionist bullshite
Nearly all of the people who live on the Falklands identify as British and would rather be under UK rule than Argentinian rule.
Nearly all of the people who live on the Falklands identify as British and would rather be under UK rule than Argentinian rule.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:13 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Nearly all of the people who live on the Falklands identify as British and would rather be under UK rule than Argentinian rule.
If the British started shipping Muslim immigrants there, and they had to endure the hell that people in London are, do you think they would feel the same?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:15 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Good
Argentina is a better ally than the UK
Argentina is a better ally than the UK
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:58 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Would be funny if the UK said, " You want it???? Sold"
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:30 am to Bobby OG Johnson
I hope Argentina moves on them. The British are in no condition to stop them, but would beg the US to do their work for them.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:32 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
The UK would destroy them. The UK is not in good shape militarily, but Argentina is on a whole other level of crap.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:32 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Argentina has no claim whatsoever to the islands. Ever—at any historical point.
That’s not true. There is a lot of confusion over who had the rights to the Falklands, the UK or Spain. When Argentina got independence from Spain they argue that the Falklands were part of that, and they ruled the Falklands for several decades before the British reasserted their control.
I’m not saying Argentina’s claim is convincing, but to say they have “no claim whatsoever” is not accurate. Ultimately, this is a might-makes-right argument.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:34 am to Rebel
quote:
During the Falkland War, the residents of the island were nearly unanimous wanting to stay a subject of the UK.
Has that changed?
Argentina's currency is worthless, while the British Pound is doing well despite the state of the UK.
I seriously doubt they prefer to be a part of Argentina
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:35 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
The British are in no condition to stop them
They are in much better shape than Argentina.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:36 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
Argentina is a better ally than the UK
That is for certain right now
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:53 am to Penrod
quote:
When Argentina got independence from Spain they argue that the Falklands were part of that, and they ruled the Falklands for several decades before the British reasserted their control.
Eh, more like a period of three and a half years before the British reasserted control in 1833.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:11 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Eh, more like a period of three and a half years before the British reasserted control in 1833.
quote:
In 1770, Spain seized Port Egmont and expelled the British, citing the agreement with France. The British maintained that that agreement applied only to East Falkland. In 1771, a British naval force retook West Falkland, meeting no opposition. In 1774, faced with more urgent naval matters elsewhere, Britain withdrew from its base, albeit without relinquishing its claims. From 1800 until 1820, the Falklands were abandoned to feral cattle and to seal hunters of several nations. Meanwhile, the Spanish colonies proclaimed their independence. During the long process of consolidation and establishment of boundaries for the newly independent states, a naval officer in the service of Buenos Aires landed at Port Louis in 1820. He claimed the Falklands for his employers and left a garrison there. In 1826, the newly constituted Republic of Argentina granted a charter to Louis Vernet, a German-born immigrant, to found a settlement. By 1831, this settlement was a viable concern, with about one hundred civilian inhabitants cultivating the soil and exploiting wild cattle. Conflicts arose between Vernet and sealers who wantonly slaughtered seals and cattle. To combat this behavior, the Argentine government officially appointed Vernet governor and empowered him to seize offenders. In 1831, after repeatedly warning American sealers to stay away, he seized one of their ships and sent the crew to Buenos Aires for prosecution. America responded predictably. A gunboat under the command of Captain Silas Duncan attacked and sacked Port Soledad, formerly Port Louis. The U.S. government backed his actions, refusing to compensate Vernet. In 1832, the British reviewed the situation in the Falkland Islands and Argentina. The infant Republic of Argentina was engaged in a civil war, as its dictator, Juan Manuel de Rosas, consolidated his power. Thus, though Argentina arguably had a legitimate territorial claim, it lacked the ability to enforce it. Moreover, given the record of aggressive American territorial expansion and the rivalry between Britain and America over whale fisheries and access to markets on the Pacific coast of South America, the British viewed the attack on Port Soledad as a possible prelude to American occupation. They therefore dispatched the warship Clio, which arrived in January of 1833. Finding Port Soledad apparently deserted, the British declared the Falklands to be without effective sovereignty and raised the British flag over the islands. Argentina disputed the claim, as Vernet’s agent was still present, along with some of the settlers and a few troops.
From 1774 to 1833 there were no British on the Falklands. From 1820 to 1833 it was ruled by Argentina.
EBSCO Research Paper
There is nothing conclusive about this, except that it shows that “Argentina has zero claim” to be wrong.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 4:06 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Now's your chance to take the islands Argentina. The once mighty Royal Navy has now morphed into a junkyard navy. There's no Margaret Thatcher around this time either with balls bigger than the latest flavor of the week British PM.
Popular
Back to top



0



