re: Matt Walsh: Debunking the Erika Kirk Conspiracy Theories

After wackatimesthree is & all the posters parroting "Candace is Crazy, Evil, She's a Loon"......

I decided to go back and have a listen to Candace. I watched the first episode of "Bride of Charlie".

And for wackatimesthree......2 simple questions?

Do you admit to not watching, listening to Candace's Podcasts!?

Or do you affirm that you are idiot supreme with no cognitive, logical intelligence?!

It's one or the other? Because, once again, Candace is Dead On Right about her arguments, questions, facts - with Court Documents, Proof to support his suppositions!

Go ahead and take the easy fall & admit you hav'nt watched/listened. For if you have - you are indeed an idiot fool not worth anyone's time.

And IF you claim you've listened/watched......tell us the first few points, questions Candace mentions & the support documents, photos, dates she clearly divulges in her podcast!?!?

I won't wait, because you are a Pavlov's Dog Idiot and Nothing you say matters. But one way or the other......you will out yourself bigly by being unable to answer my simple questions regarding the topics/questions Candace focuses on (covered in first 20 minutes of "Bride of Charlie"), and thus clearly display to others on TD who/what you are.

Sorry Dude - you walked right into it.

quote:

---

You never answered my question. Ever shot a 30-06?

---

I have answered it. No.

You never answered my question. Other than shooting a .30-06 on peepaw’s farm, what expertise do you possess in ballistics? You can answer none and shorten this circus.

quote:

---

No fricking way Kirk was kllled by a 30 06 bullet.

---

This will be good, why do you think that?

quote:

---

What did you find most compelling? Candace spending ten minutes reading a tweet from a no-name, wannabe influencer that the influencer admits is 100% opinion on Erika? (Fact-free)

---

I don’t care who wrote the tweet. Fact is, it’s spot on about her personality.

quote:

---

Yep = she is acting totally different than the standard rules for
"How a Wife/Mother Should Act after the Assassination of her Husband"

How dare she fly in the face of such established proper conduct??

---

This is just stupid and really the only argument anyone presents. Her behavior is so far beyond any sort of normal grieving that people notice/experience throughout their lives. If there is a murder, the behavior of the spouse is always considered. Not as a proof of guilt, but just as a baseline for further consideration. In this instance, I really just think she is a fame seeking gold digger. When you look at everything about her and also consider her actual behavior, it leads any sane person to question the sincerity behind her entire persona. You also didn't address either of the things I mentioned. Can you imagine anyone you know posting a video on instagram caressng the hands of their deceased husband? Come on. Take the blinders off. We probably agree on most things but to act like this woman isn't beyond strange is just choosing to not actually look at the facts.

quote:

---

I don’t care who wrote the tweet. Fact is, it’s spot on about her personality.

---

There’s not a single fact in the tweet. The author of the tweet says the same, not once, but twice in the tweet.

The fact that you swallowed that entire tweet without realizing it was just a chick watching a chick on a screen from afar that she irrationally hates and making amateur pop psychology pronouncements completely disconnected from fact means you’re a literal retard.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Her behavior is so far beyond any sort of normal grieving that people notice/experience throughout their lives.

---

Do you know Erika Kirk? Unless you know her personally, in her day to day life, how in the hell could you possibly have any idea what she’s like in the other 99% of her day to day life based off the 1% of time you see her on tv?

The fact of the matter is you have no fricking clue what she’s really like, none of us do. And regardless of the fact that she doesn’t seem like an emotional mess on camera, we don’t know that she isn’t an emotional wreck off camera. Or maybe she is pretty good at controlling her emotions or hides what’s going on in her heart and in her mind? Furthermore, maybe she isn’t an emotional wreck because she’s secure in where Charlie went and where she’s going and knows that beyond a shadow of a doubt she’ll see him again? Maybe she knows Charlie received his reward and she knows what awaits her on the other side as well?

Could she be a cold hearted woman who never loved Charlie Kirk and only used him for wealth and power? Sure, I suppose. But there’s no way to know that.

Man you conspiracy nuts are the most annoying people. Not everything is a false flag. Not everything is a conspiracy.

quote:

---

KidCreole

---

Her contrived and contorted facial expressions while analyzing Erika Kirk's story about the night before Charlie's death, and her reactions to very normal things about family life meant to imply something weird was DEFINITELY going on based on the story, made me instantly realize she isn't speaking to people like me with her lunacy. She's speaking to people like you.

Apparently Candace that Erica Put some kind of drops in her eyes to make it appear as if she's crying. Anyone have the video?