Started By
Message

re: Matt Walsh: Debunking the Erika Kirk Conspiracy Theories

Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9573 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

It’s almost like that company is what supports her family…

"House wife" to CEO of a billion dollar company. Erika deserves scrutiny since its she and TPUSA that have been caught lying about Charlie and Candace Owens.
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 4:15 pm
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
2354 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:14 pm to
I dont know anything about the conspiracy theories and I certainly wouldnt ever listen to candace owens on the matter. That being said, I find Erika's behavior to be completely bizarre and there is definitely something going on there. It could be as simple as she has no idea how to act and is trying to just behave the way she thinks shes supposed to, but I'm not buying what she's putting out there. Her body language and expressions are just off.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182306 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I find Erika's behavior to be completely bizarre and there is definitely something going on there.



How would you like Erika to act so she can fulfill your opinion about how a grieving widow is supposed to act?

When she acts how you would like her to act, then how will she satisfy the people who say that is strange?

How do you think you would act in her shoes?

Do you think she is sad behind closed doors but trying to appear strong in her newly found national spotlight?
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
14105 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

I stopped right away to check his stance on the 9-11 massacre since he referenced it immediately. I figured this would be a good metric to use as to his willingness to "go against the grain", as it were. I wasn't surprised to find out that he treats the official narrative of 9-11 as factual. Then I refused to listen to any more of that 53 minute video.

I got 10 seconds in before turning it off.

Pick a conspiracy easily debunked like the “Erika Kirk Conspiracy” and then use it as a tool or weapon to debunk other historical conspiracies.

The look at me expert with street credit.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9573 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

How would you like Erika to act so she can fulfill your opinion about how a grieving widow is supposed to act?



Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182306 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:37 pm to
Wow...that meme totally changed my mind and now I see it. She isn't acting like I think she should act!

Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36321 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Most people do not understand high school level physics, just don't care, and/or afraid of the implications of a nefarious narrative, that's why the official narrative is successful.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13462 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

I stopped right away to check his stance on the 9-11 massacre since he referenced it immediately. I figured this would be a good metric to use as to his willingness to "go against the grain", as it were. I wasn't surprised to find out that he treats the official narrative of 9-11 as factual. Then I refused to listen to any more of that 53 minute video.


I held off until seeing how you weighed in, as I knew that would be a great indicator as to whether his analysis is valid or a dumb piece of shite.

Since you rejected it I know it's not a dumb piece of shite.

Now I'll watch it.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71094 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:45 pm to
The conspiracy is Charlie wouldn't have wanted his wife to carry on his legacy, but he would have wanted Owens to harrass and slander his family for clicks?

Do any of yall have an opinion on Owens' behavior? She's acting like a rationale friend of Charlie in your view?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13462 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I couldn't care less. Especially now that it's the governments official stance that China interfered in our elections in 2020. I remember outright censorship over this issue when it was called out at the time. People were called idiots then too.

It speaks, again, to this willingness to go against the grain. People who aren't willing to do this mock folks who do. The folks who are censored for doing so RIGHTLY call the rest of you people idiots.


Now when you were making an arse of yourself advocating for UFO disclosure your argument was that YOU were the one going with the official government narrative.

So does that mean that I'm the one who is right about that because I'm going against the grain on that one and you are wrong because you are a dumb sheep?

If not, exactly how are these things determined?
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 4:49 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13462 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

His sister has huge brains


Looks like artificial intelligence to me.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37276 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:52 pm to
He did it well, but it’s almost absurd to even legitimize Owens and her bullshite by responding to it
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13462 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

People were called idiots then too.


Maybe,

but this is different. You really are an idiot.
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 4:54 pm
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19298 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:53 pm to
Prominent good looking well spoken past beauty queen who took the reins of the assassinated husbands media style company. Of course she’s in front of the camera
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9573 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

She's acting like a rationale friend of Charlie in your view?

Yes because the narrative that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk is complete bunk with no real investigation.

And Owens has not harrassed Erika until she was caught lying and allowing TPUSA lie about her when she knew the truth.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182306 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Yes because the narrative that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk is complete bunk with no real investigation.



Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108971 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I dismissed him as an idiot after 10 seconds.


Now that’s irony.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22714 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Do any of yall have an opinion on Owens' behavior? She's acting like a rationale friend of Charlie in your view?

Owens is a loon.

It's not a grieving thing for me w/r/t Erika Kirk. She simply comes off fake AF and a little dim.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11292 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:58 pm to
So, first it was Bongino and now Walsh. Almost seems coordinated
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13462 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

with no real investigation.


LOL.

Because law enforcement is required to post all of their investigative findings in real time on social media so that Zephyrius can keep tabs and determine whether the investigation is robust or not.

.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram