Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Liberal View of Greed - the rich are greedy for not paying extra

Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:16 am
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
7091 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:16 am
Browsing the dwindling assholes on DU a whole thread of angry old hippies because Peter Theil will leave CA before paying their billionaires tax.

Calls to arrest him, lock him up, and mostly “how greedy can you be?! All delivered without a sense of irony.

How much money are you entitled? I’d say all you earned.

How much of someone else’s money are we entitled to? I’d say zero

Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
3381 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:32 am to
quote:

How much money are you entitled? I’d say all you earned.

How much of someone else’s money are we entitled to? I’d say zero


That's because many liberals believe money supply is static and that the wealthy only got it by denying someone else. While crony capitalism has chosen some winners and losers, everyone can be middle-upper middle class, if they truly try.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52503 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:44 am to
quote:

How much money are you entitled? I’d say all you earned.

How much of someone else’s money are we entitled to? I’d say zero

The truth about taxing billionaires is that you can’t get any more money from them because they are already giving it away. Elon Musk said once that between $3 billion and $5 billion is basically infinity; that you can’t spend more than that.

So what is Elon doing with the other $700 billion he can’t spend? He is putting it to work for humanity - building companies to solve what he perceives are the biggest problems confronting mankind. What is Bill Gates doing with his? Giving it away at a rate that has him about half as wealthy as he would be if he never started his foundation.

The point is that if a billionaire can’t spend his fortune he perforce has to give it away, and they do. If you tax it they’ll just give away less. And you know they give it away more efficiently than the government would.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37168 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:57 am to
But all chose what to do with their money. The government shouldn’t beyond current code.
Posted by TheBeezer
Texas
Member since Apr 2013
1982 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:21 am to
The Liberal view of greed is ever-changing, always evolving, always coming up with new ways to tax people. Peter Thiel and Larry Page are smartly leaving CA in advance because its already one of the most over-taxed yet fiscally mismanaged states in the country so if the state of CA is going to pass a law that starts taxing unrealized gains on investments, that is next level stupid and another shining example of exactly how blatantly hypocritical, shortsightedly stupid, and greedy Democrat policies truly are.
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
20348 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

What is Bill Gates doing with his?

Trying to eliminate 1/2 the world's population.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
14477 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:25 am to
Liberals have everything backwards.

They believe a person wanting to keep what they rightfully own is "greed".

Wanting to take something from someone else against that person's will because your think you deserve it more than them is "not greed".



These are the same people who will excuse a criminal's behavior. They will claim the criminal isn't responsible for their own actions that they personally chose to take - because "society forced them" to do it.

Yet other people are "responsible" for things that took place hundreds of years before they were born. Things they had absolutely no choice in.


Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
7529 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:39 am to
This is how Communists get young and poor people to vote for them.

Young because stupid and idealistic. Poor because they want benefits.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52503 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Trying to eliminate 1/2 the world's population.

You might be right. A rich man’s charitable priorities might be counter productive, but I’d still take the average wisdom of a few rich people over that of the federal government.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58006 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Browsing the dwindling assholes on DU a whole thread of angry old hippies because Peter Theil will leave CA before paying their billionaires tax.

Calls to arrest him, lock him up, and mostly “how greedy can you be?! All delivered without a sense of irony.

How much money are you entitled? I’d say all you earned.

How much of someone else’s money are we entitled to? I’d say zero


The liberal view is that wealth is a bit like energy, it can be neither created nor destroyed because it's a finite amount. If we think of it as a pie, then the only way someone can be rich or wealthy is because they've taken from someone else's share of the wealth pie.

We all know that's insane, but that's the underpinning of the liberal view. That being so distanced from reality is what is so incomprehensible to the rest of us.
Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
1984 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:28 pm to
What was the tax rate on wealthy people when America was at his greatest World War I in World War II? Since Republicans started their war on taxation, America has been in steady decline. Schools roads infrastructure have declined. The United States military went from being able to fight wars on two fronts to barely being able to fight a war. Add to this while Republicans were fighting taxes the Democrats totally destroyed our culture.

We need to remove waste from government but people need to pay their share of taxes. No one has ever needed a billion dollars. Let the uberwealthy and the government they bought and paid for figure this out.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23191 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:31 pm to

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" - Marx

Choice is not a factor for marxists.
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
1970 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

No one has ever needed a billion dollars.


There are a lot of things people don’t need. If you acquire it, why should someone be able to decide how much and what you should keep?

Why should people who own no property and live off of government assistance be able to vote on increases in taxes?

Watch how that goes in NOLA next year.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19580 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Since Republicans started their war on taxation, America has been in steady decline. Schools roads infrastructure have declined. The United States military went from being able to fight wars on two fronts to barely being able to fight a war. Add to this while Republicans were fighting taxes the Democrats totally destroyed our culture.
in 1960, the year i was born, the personal exemption was $600

starting with that 601st dollar, every single American citizen was taxed - yes, even those who made a single dollar of taxable income:

Tax Rate for > $0 in taxable income was 20 %

that way everyone - not just the “rich” - had skin in the game

the “Republican war on taxation” actually started in 1964, when a Democratic POTUS and majority Dem Congress reduced the rates across the board - it wasn’t until 1977 (again, with Dems in control of the WH and Congress) that the bottom bracket rate was set to 0%

incidentally, that was also around the time that Federal debt began to run out of control



Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39492 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:41 pm to
The ones usually screaming the most about greedy Bastards are the Limousine Liberal Hypocrites
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
95 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

So what is Elon doing with the other $700 billion he can’t spend? He is putting it to work for humanity - building companies to solve what he perceives are the biggest problems confronting mankind. What is Bill Gates doing with his? Giving it away at a rate that has him about half as wealthy as he would be if he never started his foundation.


Using billions to create companies to make you more money is not the same thing as giving money away to charity. Not even remotely the same thing.

Also Elon isn’t using anything close to that 700 Billion on his companies, it’s just sitting as stock.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52503 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Using billions to create companies to make you more money is not the same thing as giving money away to charity. Not even remotely the same thing.

It’s better. Elon Musk is solving some of the biggest problems facing mankind. He will give virtually all of his money away, as will everyone with a net worth north of about $30 billion. They simply can’t spend it. And anyone who inherits it will probably spend a bunch on taxes and then give annually to charities. Tax them and they’ll just give less.

quote:

Also Elon isn’t using anything close to that 700 Billion on his companies, it’s just sitting as stock.

Is this a joke? Do you think that’s what stocks do? Just sit there? The value of those stocks is deployed as capital. It’s the fuel that makes the company go.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 7:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram