Started By
Message

re: Latest video of the shooting. Total mess.

Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:38 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49518 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:38 am to
quote:

Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.

Well stated - these pathetic asshats think they can act as if they are practicing a high school play - where they can go back and forth change 'one little thing' to make the play more 'authentic.'

ICE agents are in the real world - but a world that has been hi-jacked by traitorous leadership and augmented by a greedy, ignorant, amoral public.

Screw 'em all - until someone in authority up there discovers a logical thought and steps in to correct the situation.

The governor, AG, and mayor ought to be in jail = not only for their prior corruption and maladministration, but also for promoting a riot.

What they are trying to do is set up a Somali style culture there - supported and financed by the taxpayers of the nation. Screw em.

They ALL need to be in jail.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476570 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:41 am to
quote:

You’re a retarded insane person


Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49518 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:43 am to
quote:

yet you are still exercising your constitutional rights.

You have no "right" to interfere with law enforcement - constitutional or logical.

The only way it is OK is if you have declared WAR against the group you are "interfering" with.

I do not recall any of these creeps rioting because some woman was arrested for praying in front of an abortion clinic. THAT should have ignited MASSIVE riots and retaliation - if such methods of "redressing greivances' were legal.

Liberal asshats want the 'law' to be applied in one direction only - and they get to define what the "law" mean for each specific offense.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6653 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:50 am to
quote:

"If you approach law enforcement with a gun,


What about fighting with an officer while being armed?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476570 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:53 am to
quote:

I do not recall any of these creeps rioting because some woman was arrested for praying in front of an abortion clinic.


Which case involves an arrest for someone only praying in front of an abortion clinic?
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37506 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:03 am to
Lesson here is don't interfere with ICE when they are attempting to violate someone else's rights.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26043 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:07 am to
The best and most proven way to avoid getting shot by a cop:

COMPLIANCE
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26043 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:07 am to
DELETE double post
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 7:08 am
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16623 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:44 am to
quote:

so he continued to push the officers

Is that what we’re supposed to do?

Do courts back that up?
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12685 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Im .always amazed at how fricking dumb these people are. Girl videoing yelling oh my god when they unload. They don’t understand that they are showing up to a very dangerous situation where agents are putting their life on the line to remove criminals. They think it’s all politics and fun and games,


To be fair this was a specific operation in an active neighborhood. There could be people on the block that were there for business and didn’t just race out.

Also, just because it’s a dangerous scene doesn’t mean you are not allowed to react. We often see the agents themselves react.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31551 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

I hope you feel that way if you ever carry outside your house.

Well dickhead I’m not going to go fight police with a pistol in my belt.

And this wasn’t some little Ruger LCP either.
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9130 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:58 am to
l
quote:

ol, come on dude…..he was trying to pull another protestor away and the agents told him to stop, so he continued to push the officers and drag the other person away and that’s when they rolled him


AKA Obstruction of Police Officers, and while armed. Gee, I wonder what could go wrong?
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:00 am
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16623 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Also, what exactly gave the agent the legal right or power to shove the woman which started everything ?

That particular agent in my opinion was overly aggressive. He’s the same agent that also used his chemical spray as a blunt object against the deceased. I would not want to be on an arrest team with him. I’ll take it a step farther and say he should not be in law enforcement.

The shooter was across the street during the shoving incident and there’s no reason to believe he could see that activity.

The first agent’s behavior has no bearing on the events that caused the shooter to shoot. He has to perceive an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to himself or a fellow officer, regardless of whether or not another officer pushed acted too aggressively.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91448 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:08 am to





This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:11 am
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:11 am to
If you’re going to carry a gun to a protest, and then get involved in the protest, and then get physically involved in the protest and with armed law enforcement on the other side of the protest, then you stand a substantial likelihood of coming out on the wrong end of it, whether you draw your gun, your gun is drawn from you, or even if your gun accidentally falls out of your possession or is accidentally discharged.

The guy went looking for trouble. He unfortunately found it. I’ll pray for him and his family.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:13 am
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:19 am to
quote:

good to know how everyone on here thinks the police should shoot anyone that they see has a gun. I hope you feel that way if you ever carry outside your house.


Didn’t watch the video but you are telling me this guy was just walking along in front of his house and the police drive up see him with a gun and start shooting him with no warning? Yea that’s very bad and if that is what happened I’m sure the police officers involved will be fully charged. What you played out is pretty cut and dry. I don’t even need to see the video.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:20 am
Posted by Norbert
Member since Oct 2018
3692 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:27 am to
quote:

They arent police Stop defending the actions of these loons


It turns out ICE deputization has resulted in an even dumber version of dumb cops.

That being said, showing up armed to interfere with law enforcement activity or observe them be interfered with is a poor life choice.

Fight them in court. Fight them in authorized protests. Fight them in voting booths.

Do not fight them in the street when they are carrying out their duties.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:29 am
Posted by SnacknGold06
Member since Oct 2025
142 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Didn’t watch the video


You should watch the video and inform yourself. His weapon was concealed and removed just prior to the agents shots.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12182 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Describe how the agents should have reacted upon seeing the perp had a gun. Please elaborate. They overreacted? How many times have you faced a gun? Freaking moron.

I would say a perp w/a gun doesn’t mean automatic free pass to shoot.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55449 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Can't wait to see you get into a fight with someone who's carrying

A LEO who opens fire because a guy he’s confronting has an undrawn weapon should not be in that business. Put the shoe on the other foot. Conservatives carrying getting shot because they were legally carrying during a protest that got rambunctious.

Note: Mine is not a commentary on this particular confrontation.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 9:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram