- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: KBJ says First Amendment “hamstrings" government
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:02 am to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:02 am to thebigmuffaletta
Liberals are already screaming in support of the governmet "hamstringing" the First Amendment.
THESE PEOPLE ARE DANGEROUS!
The opinion of a liberal idiot: Even the Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Fed Up With the Garbage Coming Out of the 5th Circuit
THESE PEOPLE ARE DANGEROUS!
quote:
What happens when a lawless judge and a terrible appeals court embrace the dopiest First Amendment claim you’ve ever heard out of pure spite toward a Democratic president? That would be Murthy v. Missouri, a brain-meltingly dumb case that the Supreme Court was unfortunate enough to hear oral arguments in on Monday. Murthy poses a question so asinine that to ask it is to answer it: Can government officials encourage social media companies to moderate certain content that they deem harmful—most importantly, disinformation about COVID-19 in the middle of the pandemic?
Yes, of course they can: The First Amendment does not gag public officials from urging Facebook or the Washington Post or anyone else to publish or not publish certain information, especially when it contains dangerous lies about a once-in-a-century pandemic that could exacerbate the crisis. The First Amendment bars government censorship, not government persuasion, and the Biden administration planted itself on the latter side of that bright line. At least six justices grasped this basic constitutional principle on Monday. Several of them used arguments to highlight how this inane case illustrates so much of what’s wrong with the judiciary today, and hinted at the dangers it could pose to American democracy in the future. That we should pay attention to. The rest was an unfortunate sideshow.
Like so many Supreme Court cases these days, Murthy is built atop a heap of fake facts. The case began when Missouri and Louisiana sued agencies and officials across the Biden administration, falsely accusing them of coercing social media companies into censoring their residents’ free speech. (These states later added a handful of fringe anti-vaxxers to the suit.) They filed their complaint in the Monroe Division of the Western District of Louisiana, where—surprise!—they were guaranteed to draw a Trump appointee, Terry Doughty, the one judge hearing cases in that division. Judge Doughty has a record of issuing nationwide injunctions against the Biden administration on the basis of dubious legal and factual analysis. Most notably, he issued a nationwide bar against Biden’s vaccine mandate for health care workers in an opinion riddled with anti-vax nonsense (which the Supreme Court reversed).
The opinion of a liberal idiot: Even the Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Fed Up With the Garbage Coming Out of the 5th Circuit
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:02 am to thebigmuffaletta
It’s astounding that a person can get appointed to the Supreme Court for life and not have the comprehension to understand the true purpose of the First Amendment
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:38 am to thebigmuffaletta
She's not very bright and she doesn't understand the government are not our bosses but our servants. It seems to be a common affliction in the DC swamp though.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 6:30 pm to thebigmuffaletta
JumanJi -From the Jungle to the Justice chamber
Posted on 3/19/24 at 6:42 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Yes, …. exactly. That is the design of the Amendment.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 6:54 pm to Orange Rock
The real issue is that if fedgov is allowed to suspend the First Amendment in an 'emergency', then they will find/create an emergency to quash speech they don't like.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:06 pm to mtntiger
quote:
The real issue is that if fedgov is allowed to suspend the First Amendment in an 'emergency', then they will find/create an emergency to quash speech they don't like.
Not "they will," "they already did." The current case was about a fake emergency.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:35 pm to GumboPot
quote:
And so does everything else in the constitution
Bingo! And well put!
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:37 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Give it to them all. Africa may actually be a better place to live after the United States is taken over by their stupidity.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:46 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Kamala Harris, Karine John Pierre, Ketanji whatever, I hope more black women are starting to realize that they are not being made to look more capable as a group by Biden pushing these retards out there simply because they just had to make it a black woman and didn't bother to see if they could even string sentences together
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:35 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
misinformation
I got censored on social media.
For "misinformation".
I said the "vaccine" doesn't stop infection.
Masks are pointless.
Everyone will get Rona.
All "misinformation", yet all true.
That's the worst part of all this.
They are claiming they should be able to censor, yet they got everything wrong!
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:38 pm to thebigmuffaletta
She should be impeached for that ridiculous, vapid, anti-American position.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:39 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
Anybody checked for plagiarism in the background of this um...justice?
I think that's an appropriate next step.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:46 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Ultimate affirmative action pick ever
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:48 pm to thebigmuffaletta
I have nothing for that Obama racist bitch has to say.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:49 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
KBJ says First Amendment “hamstrings" government
That’s a benefit, not a problem
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:54 pm to thebigmuffaletta
That dumbass DEI embarrassment to the SCOTUS is so stupid she doesn't even realize that is what the 1st Amendment was intended to accomplish.
She is a certifiable moron.
She is a certifiable moron.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:29 pm to thebigmuffaletta
1a is supposed to hamstring the government by allowing the peasants the right to call truth to power.
1a is currently crumbling before us...and is struggling against the establishment's attempts at crushing it.
1a is currently crumbling before us...and is struggling against the establishment's attempts at crushing it.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:42 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
ketanji brown jackson
In no way should that fugly, condescending, racist bitch be sitting on the highest court in the land. What a phukcing puppet and lying, corrupt POS!
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:56 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
KBJ says First Amendment “hamstrings" government
good for her. that's the point of the FCKING constitution.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News