- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/22/22 at 12:57 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Dr boy looks constipated.
I can see his Subaru Forester from here.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 12:57 pm to loogaroo
He wasnt there
He verified nothing
He examined nothing
Others told him stuff
Hes going off fraudulent Data
Why is he testifying again?
He verified nothing
He examined nothing
Others told him stuff
Hes going off fraudulent Data
Why is he testifying again?
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:20 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The 19 inch ballots couldn't be read by the tabulators. there was no other way for it to happen aside from intentionally.
What about the claim the print file could have been set to “fit to page.” That. Could be done without knowing it would make a difference. Did he address that?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:24 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Did he address that?
Yes. I believe he said only a few people had that access and would have had to manually set it that way.
He said more on it. It's back in this thread somewhere.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:27 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:IIRC, that was not a claim, it was a hypothetical extrapolating a xerox machine to a vote machine printer. It is why the witness continually refused to answer. It sounded like the contention was, in reality, there is no print-to-fit setting in the machine.
What about the claim the print file could have been set to “fit to page.”
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:30 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
He wasnt there
He verified nothing
He examined nothing
Others told him stuff
Hes going off fraudulent Data
Why is he testifying again?
Wasn't the woman who testified yesterday basically going off a voicemail?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:31 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
there is no print-to-fit setting in the machine.
I thought that, or that if you changed to that setting you'd have to know what you were doing, and be doing it purposefully. He said something about needing admin access.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:36 pm to Mickey Goldmill
No the woman yesterday was like a policeman who testified about the steps she took in investigating chain of custody.
One of which was communication she had with Maricopa County that included correspondence in the form of voicemails received from a Betty, diminutive of Elizabeth- of which 3 were employed.
Az’s investigator by contrast communicated with no one and said conspiracy theory
One of which was communication she had with Maricopa County that included correspondence in the form of voicemails received from a Betty, diminutive of Elizabeth- of which 3 were employed.
Az’s investigator by contrast communicated with no one and said conspiracy theory
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:38 pm to Wednesday
After the State rests, what happens? How long for the judge to make his decision?
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:39 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
What about the claim the print file could have been set to “fit to page.” That. Could be done without knowing it would make a difference. Did he address that?
Yes. The opposing witness posed a hypothetical (with no evidence that it actually happened) and he responded that the print to fit would have been required to have been the result of an intentional manipulation, but had the print to fit been set to print a 20 Inch it would have had no effect on the output of 20 inch ballot.
So basically the hypothetical posed by Arizona was impossible to cause the result demonstrated on the actual ballot evidence.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:43 pm to TDTOM
He’s giving himself until after Christmas- memory serves
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:44 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Women yesterday wasnt trying debunk all previous testimony because she has a PHD and is a Political Science professor.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 1:44 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Yes. The opposing witness posed a hypothetical (with no evidence that it actually happened) and he responded that the print to fit would have been required to have been the result of an intentional manipulation, but had the print to fit been set to print a 20 Inch it would have had no effect on the output of 20 inch ballot.
Right. Shrink-to-fit is for an image bigger than the print paper. In this instance the print paper was bigger than the image 20" vs 19". It's an impossibility that could be what happened.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:03 pm to MFn GIMP
Dr. Kenneth Mayer. An academic from UW-Madison.
who is this guy?
is he same as Uw contractor for Fox, whose analysis led Fox to call AZ for the winner biden.
who is this guy?
is he same as Uw contractor for Fox, whose analysis led Fox to call AZ for the winner biden.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:07 pm to Wednesday
quote:
That's what the current witness is testifying about the number of people who definitively left. If she had done it by affidavit - it would have been "anecdotal."
True….but it’s actual people who signed a document claiming they did not vote due to the jacked up voting system in AZ. That’s somewhat tangible data.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:07 pm to David_DJS
quote:
An incorrectly printed ballot wouldn't scan at ANY tabulator.
The defense better hope that’s the case.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:07 pm to CelticDog
quote:
is he same as Uw contractor for Fox, whose analysis led Fox to call AZ for the winner biden.
But that was such a reckless call he lost his job.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But that was such a reckless call he lost his job.
Link?
I don't not believe you I just haven't heard that
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:18 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Distrusting the system was what made them show up. The FUBAR system on their arrival - caused them to leave. So says the expert testimony in the case. The only rebuttal by AZ is a guy who did no investigation and said, i haven't seen any data that . . .
But that’s not being disenfranchised. If you refuse to put the ballot in box 3 to be scanned elsewhere and choose not to go somewhere else and vote, you are not disenfranchised. You chose not to vote because you don’t like the options.
Page 16 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News